IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v315y2024i3p844-854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing total completion time with machine-dependent priority lists

Author

Listed:
  • Ravindran Vijayalakshmi, Vipin
  • Schröder, Marc
  • Tamir, Tami

Abstract

We consider a natural, yet challenging variant of the parallel machine scheduling problem in which each machine imposes a preferential order over the jobs and schedules the jobs accordingly once assigned to it. We study the problem of minimizing the total completion time, distinguishing between identical and unrelated machines, machine-dependent and identical priority lists, or a constant number of different priority classes. Additionally, we consider the setting in which the priority list on a machine must satisfy longest processing time first. We resolve the computational complexity of the problem and provide a clear distinction between problems that are polynomial time solvable and APX-hard.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravindran Vijayalakshmi, Vipin & Schröder, Marc & Tamir, Tami, 2024. "Minimizing total completion time with machine-dependent priority lists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 844-854.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:3:p:844-854
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723009803
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.12.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allahverdi, Ali, 2015. "The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 345-378.
    2. Han Hoogeveen & Petra Schuurman & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2001. "Non-Approximability Results for Scheduling Problems with Minsum Criteria," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 157-168, May.
    3. W. A. Horn, 1973. "Technical Note—Minimizing Average Flow Time with Parallel Machines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 846-847, June.
    4. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    5. Wayne E. Smith, 1956. "Various optimizers for single‐stage production," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 59-66, March.
    6. J. K. Lenstra & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1978. "Complexity of Scheduling under Precedence Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 22-35, February.
    7. Cole, Richard & Correa, Jose & Gkatzelis, Vasillis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103081, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Cole, Richard & Correa, José R. & Gkatzelis, Vasilis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 306-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2019. "Implementation of optimal schedules in outsourcing with identical suppliers," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(2), pages 173-187, April.
    2. Cole, Richard & Correa, Jose & Gkatzelis, Vasillis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103081, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Felipe T. Muñoz & Rodrigo Linfati, 2024. "Bounding the Price of Anarchy of Weighted Shortest Processing Time Policy on Uniform Parallel Machines," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Dirk Briskorn & Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Minimizing the makespan on a single machine subject to modular setups," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 125-137, February.
    5. Mohammad Reza Hosseinzadeh & Mehdi Heydari & Mohammad Mahdavi Mazdeh, 2022. "Mathematical modeling and two metaheuristic algorithms for integrated process planning and group scheduling with sequence-dependent setup time," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5055-5105, November.
    6. Fátima Pilar & Eliana Costa e Silva & Ana Borges, 2023. "Optimizing Vehicle Repairs Scheduling Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming: A Case Study in the Portuguese Automobile Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Sheikh, Shaya & Komaki, G.M. & Kayvanfar, Vahid & Teymourian, Ehsan, 2019. "Multi-Stage assembly flow shop with setup time and release time," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    8. Jiang, Xiaojuan & Lee, Kangbok & Pinedo, Michael L., 2021. "Ideal schedules in parallel machine settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 422-434.
    9. Lenstra, J. K. & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., 1980. "An Introduction To Multiprocessor Scheduling," Econometric Institute Archives 272258, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Soares, Leonardo Cabral R. & Carvalho, Marco Antonio M., 2020. "Biased random-key genetic algorithm for scheduling identical parallel machines with tooling constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 955-964.
    11. Hosseini, Amir & Otto, Alena & Pesch, Erwin, 2024. "Scheduling in manufacturing with transportation: Classification and solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 821-843.
    12. Mina Roohnavazfar & Daniele Manerba & Lohic Fotio Tiotsop & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh & Roberto Tadei, 2021. "Stochastic single machine scheduling problem as a multi-stage dynamic random decision process," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 267-297, July.
    13. Felix Winter & Nysret Musliu, 2022. "A large neighborhood search approach for the paint shop scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 453-475, August.
    14. Markó Horváth & Tamás Kis, 2020. "Polyhedral results for position-based scheduling of chains on a single machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 283-322, January.
    15. Vasilis Gkatzelis & Konstantinos Kollias & Tim Roughgarden, 2016. "Optimal Cost-Sharing in General Resource Selection Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1230-1238, December.
    16. Dominik Kress & Maksim Barketau & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Single-machine batch scheduling to minimize the total setup cost in the presence of deadlines," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 595-606, December.
    17. Agnetis, Alessandro & Hermans, Ben & Leus, Roel & Rostami, Salim, 2022. "Time-critical testing and search problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 440-452.
    18. Tami Tamir, 2023. "Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 273-301, March.
    19. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    20. Hinder, Oliver & Mason, Andrew J., 2017. "A novel integer programing formulation for scheduling with family setup times on a single machine to minimize maximum lateness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 411-423.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:315:y:2024:i:3:p:844-854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.