IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jogath/v52y2023i1d10.1007_s00182-022-00819-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tami Tamir

    (Reichman University)

Abstract

We apply non-cooperative game theory to analyze the server’s activation cost in real-time scheduling systems. An instance of the game consists of a single server and a set of unit-length jobs. Every job needs to be processed along a specified time interval, defined by the job’s release-time and due-date. Jobs may also have variable weights, which specify the amount of resource they require. We assume that jobs are controlled by selfish agents who act to minimize their own cost, rather than to optimize any global objective. The jobs processed in a specific time-slot cover the server’s activation cost in this slot, with the cost being shared proportionally to the jobs’ weights. Known results on cost-sharing games do not exploit the special interval-structure of the strategy space in our game, and are therefore not tight. We present a complete analysis of equilibrium existence, computation, and inefficiency in real-time scheduling cost-sharing games. Our tight analysis covers various classes of instances, and distinguishes between unilateral and coordinated deviations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tami Tamir, 2023. "Cost-sharing games in real-time scheduling systems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 273-301, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jogath:v:52:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00182-022-00819-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00182-022-00819-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00182-022-00819-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00182-022-00819-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, Amir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 51-68, September.
    2. Milchtaich, Igal, 1996. "Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 111-124, March.
    3. Philippe Baptiste, 2000. "Batching identical jobs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 52(3), pages 355-367, December.
    4. Andelman, Nir & Feldman, Michal & Mansour, Yishay, 2009. "Strong price of anarchy," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 289-317, March.
    5. Bilò, Vittorio & Flammini, Michele & Moscardelli, Luca, 2020. "The price of stability for undirected broadcast network design with fair cost allocation is constant," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 359-376.
    6. Tobias Harks & Konstantin Miller, 2011. "The Worst-Case Efficiency of Cost Sharing Methods in Resource Allocation Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1491-1503, December.
    7. Philipp von Falkenhausen & Tobias Harks, 2013. "Optimal Cost Sharing for Resource Selection Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 184-208, February.
    8. Cole, Richard & Correa, Jose & Gkatzelis, Vasillis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103081, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Cole, Richard & Correa, José R. & Gkatzelis, Vasilis & Mirrokni, Vahab & Olver, Neil, 2015. "Decentralized utilitarian mechanisms for scheduling games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 306-326.
    10. Tobias Harks & Max Klimm, 2012. "On the Existence of Pure Nash Equilibria in Weighted Congestion Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 419-436, August.
    11. Vasilis Gkatzelis & Konstantinos Kollias & Tim Roughgarden, 2016. "Optimal Cost-Sharing in General Resource Selection Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1230-1238, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasilis Gkatzelis & Konstantinos Kollias & Tim Roughgarden, 2016. "Optimal Cost-Sharing in General Resource Selection Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1230-1238, December.
    2. Harks, Tobias & von Falkenhausen, Philipp, 2014. "Optimal cost sharing for capacitated facility location games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 187-198.
    3. Philipp von Falkenhausen & Tobias Harks, 2013. "Optimal Cost Sharing for Resource Selection Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 184-208, February.
    4. Cong Chen & Paul Giessler & Akaki Mamageishvili & Matúš Mihalák & Paolo Penna, 2024. "Sequential solutions in machine scheduling games," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 363-373, August.
    5. Le Breton, Michel & Shapoval, Alexander & Weber, Shlomo, 2021. "A game-theoretical model of the landscape theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 41-46.
    6. Fielbaum, Andres & Kucharski, Rafał & Cats, Oded & Alonso-Mora, Javier, 2022. "How to split the costs and charge the travellers sharing a ride? aligning system’s optimum with users’ equilibrium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 956-973.
    7. Ravindran Vijayalakshmi, Vipin & Schröder, Marc & Tamir, Tami, 2024. "Minimizing total completion time with machine-dependent priority lists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 844-854.
    8. Ruben Juarez & Rajnish Kumar, 2013. "Implementing efficient graphs in connection networks," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 359-403, October.
    9. Corine M. Laan & Judith Timmer & Richard J. Boucherie, 2021. "Non-cooperative queueing games on a network of single server queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 279-301, April.
    10. Krzysztof R. Apt & Bart Keijzer & Mona Rahn & Guido Schäfer & Sunil Simon, 2017. "Coordination games on graphs," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(3), pages 851-877, August.
    11. György Dósa & Leah Epstein, 2019. "Quality of strong equilibria for selfish bin packing with uniform cost sharing," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 473-485, August.
    12. Harks, Tobias & Klimm, Max, 2015. "Equilibria in a class of aggregative location games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 211-220.
    13. Le Zhang & Lijing Lyu & Shanshui Zheng & Li Ding & Lang Xu, 2022. "A Q-Learning-Based Approximate Solving Algorithm for Vehicular Route Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Martin Hoefer, 2013. "Strategic cooperation in cost sharing games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(1), pages 29-53, February.
    15. Herbert Hamers & Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2019. "Implementation of optimal schedules in outsourcing with identical suppliers," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(2), pages 173-187, April.
    16. Tobias Harks & Max Klimm, 2016. "Congestion Games with Variable Demands," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 255-277, February.
    17. Tobias Harks & Martin Hoefer & Anja Schedel & Manuel Surek, 2021. "Efficient Black-Box Reductions for Separable Cost Sharing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 134-158, February.
    18. György Dósa & Leah Epstein, 2019. "Pareto optimal equilibria for selfish bin packing with uniform cost sharing," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 827-847, April.
    19. Braat, Jac & Hamers, Herbert & Klijn, Flip & Slikker, Marco, 2019. "A selfish allocation heuristic in scheduling: Equilibrium and inefficiency bound analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 634-645.
    20. Tobias Harks & Max Klimm & Rolf Möhring, 2013. "Strong equilibria in games with the lexicographical improvement property," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 461-482, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jogath:v:52:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00182-022-00819-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.