IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v306y2023i1p17-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First-order methods for the convex hull membership problem

Author

Listed:
  • Filippozzi, Rafaela
  • Gonçalves, Douglas S.
  • Santos, Luiz-Rafael

Abstract

The convex hull membership problem (CHMP) consists in deciding whether a certain point belongs to the convex hull of a finite set of points, a decision problem with important applications in computational geometry and in foundations of linear programming. In this study, we review, compare and analyze first-order methods for CHMP, namely, Frank-Wolfe type methods, Projected Gradient methods and a recently introduced geometric algorithm, called Triangle Algorithm (TA). We discuss the connections between this algorithm and Frank-Wolfe, showing that TA can be interpreted as an inexact Frank-Wolfe. Despite this similarity, TA is strongly based on a theorem of alternatives known as distance duality. By using this theorem, we propose suitable stopping criteria for CHMP to be integrated into Frank-Wolfe type and Projected Gradient, specializing these methods to the membership decision problem. Interestingly, Frank-Wolfe integrated with such stopping criteria coincides with a greedy version of the Triangle Algorithm which is, in its turn, equivalent to an algorithm due to von Neumann. We report numerical experiments on random instances of CHMP, carefully designed to cover different scenarios, that indicate which algorithm is preferable according to the geometry of the convex hull and the relative position of the query point. Concerning potential applications, we present two illustrative examples, one related to linear programming feasibility problems and another related to image classification problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Filippozzi, Rafaela & Gonçalves, Douglas S. & Santos, Luiz-Rafael, 2023. "First-order methods for the convex hull membership problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 17-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:306:y:2023:i:1:p:17-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172200683X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harman, Radoslav & Lacko, Vladimír, 2010. "On decompositional algorithms for uniform sampling from n-spheres and n-balls," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(10), pages 2297-2304, November.
    2. Birgin, Ernesto G. & Martínez, Jose Mario & Raydan, Marcos, 2014. "Spectral Projected Gradient Methods: Review and Perspectives," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 60(i03).
    3. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    4. Geovani N. Grapiglia & Ekkehard W. Sachs, 2017. "On the worst-case evaluation complexity of non-monotone line search algorithms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 555-577, December.
    5. Pranjal Awasthi & Bahman Kalantari & Yikai Zhang, 2020. "Robust vertex enumeration for convex hulls in high dimensions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 37-73, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. B. Assunção & O. P. Ferreira & L. F. Prudente, 2021. "Conditional gradient method for multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 741-768, April.
    2. O. P. Ferreira & M. Lemes & L. F. Prudente, 2022. "On the inexact scaled gradient projection method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 91-125, January.
    3. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    4. Abdelfettah Laouzai & Rachid Ouafi, 2022. "A prediction model for atmospheric pollution reduction from urban traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 566-584, February.
    5. Wolf-Dieter Richter, 2019. "On (p1,…,pk)-spherical distributions," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Francesco Rinaldi & Damiano Zeffiro, 2023. "Avoiding bad steps in Frank-Wolfe variants," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 225-264, January.
    8. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    9. Friesz, Terry L. & Tourreilles, Francisco A. & Han, Anthony Fu-Wha, 1979. "Multi-Criteria Optimization Methods in Transport Project Evaluation: The Case of Rural Roads in Developing Countries," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1970s 318817, Transportation Research Forum.
    10. Fabiana R. Oliveira & Orizon P. Ferreira & Gilson N. Silva, 2019. "Newton’s method with feasible inexact projections for solving constrained generalized equations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 159-177, January.
    11. Ali Fattahi & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2019. "Mass Customization and “Forecasting Options’ Penetration Rates Problem”," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1120-1134, July.
    12. Bo Jiang & Tianyi Lin & Shiqian Ma & Shuzhong Zhang, 2019. "Structured nonconvex and nonsmooth optimization: algorithms and iteration complexity analysis," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 115-157, January.
    13. Andrej Čopar & Blaž Zupan & Marinka Zitnik, 2019. "Fast optimization of non-negative matrix tri-factorization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. James Chok & Geoffrey M. Vasil, 2023. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex," Papers 2305.09046, arXiv.org.
    15. A. de Palma & Y. Nesterov, 2001. "Stationary Dynamic Solutions in Congested Transportation Networks: Summary and Perspectives," THEMA Working Papers 2001-19, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    16. D. J. White, 1993. "A parametric‐based heuristic program for the quadratic assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 553-568, June.
    17. Pospíšil, Lukáš & Dostál, Zdeněk, 2018. "The projected Barzilai–Borwein method with fall-back for strictly convex QCQP problems with separable constraints," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 79-89.
    18. Kang, Seong-Cheol & Lee, Hoyoung, 2019. "Economic appraisal of implementing electric vehicle taxis in Seoul," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 45-52.
    19. Michael W. Levin & Melissa Duell & S. Travis Waller, 2020. "Arrival Time Reliability in Strategic User Equilibrium," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 803-831, September.
    20. Yong Xia & Zi Xu, 2010. "An efficient Lagrangian smoothing heuristic for Max-Cut," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 683-700, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:306:y:2023:i:1:p:17-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.