IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v75y2020i1d10.1007_s10589-019-00148-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rank-two update algorithm versus Frank–Wolfe algorithm with away steps for the weighted Euclidean one-center problem

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-jie Cong

    (Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications)

  • Le Wang

    (Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications)

  • Hui Sun

    (Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications)

Abstract

The weighted Euclidean one-center (WEOC) problem is one of the classic problems in facility location theory, which is also a generalization of the minimum enclosing ball (MEB) problem. Given m points in $${\mathbb {R}}^{n}$$Rn, the WEOC problem computes a center point $$c\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}$$c∈Rn that minimizes the maximum weighted Euclidean distance to m given points. The rank-two update algorithm is an effective method for solving the minimum volume enclosing ellipsoid (MVEE) problem. It updates only two components of the solution at each iteration, which was previously proposed in Cong et al. (Comput Optim Appl 51(1):241–257, 2012). In this paper, we further develop and analyze the rank-two update algorithm for solving the WEOC problem. At each iteration, the calculation of the optimal step-size for the WEOC problem needs to distinguish four different cases, which is a challenge in comparison with the MVEE problem. We establish the theoretical results of the complexity and the core set size of the rank-two update algorithm for the WEOC problem, which are the generalizations of the currently best-known results for the MEB problem. In addition, by constructing an important inequality for the WEOC problem, we establish the linear convergence of this rank-two update algorithm. Numerical experiments show that the rank-two update algorithm is comparable to the Frank–Wolfe algorithm with away steps for the WEOC problem. In particular, the rank-two update algorithm is more efficient than the Frank–Wolfe algorithm with away steps for problem instances with $$m\gg n$$m≫n under high precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-jie Cong & Le Wang & Hui Sun, 2020. "Rank-two update algorithm versus Frank–Wolfe algorithm with away steps for the weighted Euclidean one-center problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 237-262, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:75:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10589-019-00148-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-019-00148-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-019-00148-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-019-00148-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Hansen & Dominique Peeters & Denis Richard & Jacques-Francois Thisse, 1985. "The Minisum and Minimax Location Problems Revisited," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 1251-1265, December.
    2. Nimrod Megiddo, 1983. "The Weighted Euclidean 1-Center Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 498-504, November.
    3. Richard L. Francis, 1967. "Letter to the Editor—Some Aspects of a Minimax Location Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 1163-1169, December.
    4. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    5. Wei-jie Cong & Hong-wei Liu & Feng Ye & Shui-sheng Zhou, 2012. "Rank-two update algorithms for the minimum volume enclosing ellipsoid problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 241-257, January.
    6. André Berger & Alexander Grigoriev & Andrej Winokurow, 2017. "An efficient algorithm for the single facility location problem with polyhedral norms and disk-shaped demand regions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 661-669, December.
    7. Peng Sun & Robert M. Freund, 2004. "Computation of Minimum-Volume Covering Ellipsoids," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 690-706, October.
    8. S. L. Hakimi, 1964. "Optimum Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 450-459, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piyush Kumar & E. Alper Yıldırım, 2009. "An Algorithm and a Core Set Result for the Weighted Euclidean One-Center Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 614-629, November.
    2. Nazlı Dolu & Umur Hastürk & Mustafa Kemal Tural, 2020. "Solution methods for a min–max facility location problem with regional customers considering closest Euclidean distances," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 537-560, March.
    3. Alfandari, Laurent, 2004. "Choice Rules with Size Constraints for Multiple Criteria Decision Making," ESSEC Working Papers DR 04002, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    4. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    5. James F. Campbell & Morton E. O'Kelly, 2012. "Twenty-Five Years of Hub Location Research," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 153-169, May.
    6. S Salhi & A Al-Khedhairi, 2010. "Integrating heuristic information into exact methods: The case of the vertex p-centre problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(11), pages 1619-1631, November.
    7. Abdelfettah Laouzai & Rachid Ouafi, 2022. "A prediction model for atmospheric pollution reduction from urban traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 566-584, February.
    8. M Horn, 1996. "Analysis and Computational Schemes for p-Median Heuristics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(9), pages 1699-1708, September.
    9. Eliş, Haluk & Tansel, Barbaros & Oğuz, Osman & Güney, Mesut & Kian, Ramez, 2021. "On guarding real terrains: The terrain guarding and the blocking path problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Daoqin Tong & Alan T. Murray, 2009. "Maximising coverage of spatial demand for service," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(1), pages 85-97, March.
    11. Ortiz-Astorquiza, Camilo & Contreras, Ivan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2018. "Multi-level facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 791-805.
    12. Fredriksson, Anders, 2017. "Location-allocation of public services – Citizen access, transparency and measurement. A method and evidence from Brazil and Sweden," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Gianmarco I P Ottaviano & Jacques-François Thisse, 2005. "New Economic Geography: What about the N?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(10), pages 1707-1725, October.
    15. J. Redondo & J. Fernández & I. García & P. Ortigosa, 2009. "A robust and efficient algorithm for planar competitive location problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 87-105, March.
    16. Schnepper, Teresa & Klamroth, Kathrin & Stiglmayr, Michael & Puerto, Justo, 2019. "Exact algorithms for handling outliers in center location problems on networks using k-max functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 441-451.
    17. Michael Brusco & J Dennis Cradit & Douglas Steinley, 2021. "A comparison of 71 binary similarity coefficients: The effect of base rates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Wen, Meilin & Iwamura, Kakuzo, 2008. "Fuzzy facility location-allocation problem under the Hurwicz criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 627-635, January.
    19. Hong Gao & Kai Liu & Xinchao Peng & Cheng Li, 2020. "Optimal Location of Fast Charging Stations for Mixed Traffic of Electric Vehicles and Gasoline Vehicles Subject to Elastic Demands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Davood Shishebori & Lawrence Snyder & Mohammad Jabalameli, 2014. "A Reliable Budget-Constrained FL/ND Problem with Unreliable Facilities," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 549-580, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:75:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10589-019-00148-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.