IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v233y2014i3p539-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Subset Sum game

Author

Listed:
  • Darmann, Andreas
  • Nicosia, Gaia
  • Pferschy, Ulrich
  • Schauer, Joachim

Abstract

In this work we address a game theoretic variant of the Subset Sum problem, in which two decision makers (agents/players) compete for the usage of a common resource represented by a knapsack capacity. Each agent owns a set of integer weighted items and wants to maximize the total weight of its own items included in the knapsack. The solution is built as follows: Each agent, in turn, selects one of its items (not previously selected) and includes it in the knapsack if there is enough capacity. The process ends when the remaining capacity is too small for including any item left.

Suggested Citation

  • Darmann, Andreas & Nicosia, Gaia & Pferschy, Ulrich & Schauer, Joachim, 2014. "The Subset Sum game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 539-549.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:233:y:2014:i:3:p:539-549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221713007315
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fujimoto, Masako & Yamada, Takeo, 2006. "An exact algorithm for the knapsack sharing problem with common items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 693-707, June.
    2. Caprara, Alberto & Kellerer, Hans & Pferschy, Ulrich & Pisinger, David, 2000. "Approximation algorithms for knapsack problems with cardinality constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 333-345, June.
    3. Claudia Marini & Gaia Nicosia & Andrea Pacifici & Ulrich Pferschy, 2013. "Strategies in competing subset selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 181-200, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2017. "Price of Fairness for allocating a bounded resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 933-943.
    2. Pferschy, Ulrich & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Schauer, Joachim, 2021. "On the Stackelberg knapsack game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 18-31.
    3. Molinero, Xavier & Riquelme, Fabián & Serna, Maria, 2015. "Cooperation through social influence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 960-974.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aardal, Karen & van den Berg, Pieter L. & Gijswijt, Dion & Li, Shanfei, 2015. "Approximation algorithms for hard capacitated k-facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 358-368.
    2. Elif Akçalı & Alper Üngör & Reha Uzsoy, 2005. "Short‐term capacity allocation problem with tool and setup constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(8), pages 754-764, December.
    3. Iida, Hiroshi, 2014. "A further addendum to "Some thoughts on the 2-approximation algorithm for knapsack problems: A survey"," ビジネス創造センターディスカッション・ペーパー (Discussion papers of the Center for Business Creation) 10252/5386, Otaru University of Commerce.
    4. Yalçın Akçay & Haijun Li & Susan Xu, 2007. "Greedy algorithm for the general multidimensional knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 17-29, March.
    5. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong, 2017. "Order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of service level," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 429-447, January.
    6. Talla Nobibon, Fabrice & Leus, Roel & Spieksma, Frits C.R., 2011. "Optimization models for targeted offers in direct marketing: Exact and heuristic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 670-683, May.
    7. Yoon, Yourim & Kim, Yong-Hyuk & Moon, Byung-Ro, 2012. "A theoretical and empirical investigation on the Lagrangian capacities of the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 366-376.
    8. Jooken, Jorik & Leyman, Pieter & De Causmaecker, Patrick, 2022. "A new class of hard problem instances for the 0–1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 841-854.
    9. Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia & Penz, Bernard & Rapine, Christophe, 2013. "Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 55-61.
    10. Mu'alem, Ahuva & Nisan, Noam, 2008. "Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 612-631, November.
    11. Klamler, Christian & Pferschy, Ulrich & Ruzika, Stefan, 2012. "Committee selection under weight constraints," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 48-56.
    12. Naldi, Maurizio & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2019. "Profit-fairness trade-off in project selection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-146.
    13. Dahmani, Isma & Hifi, Mhand & Wu, Lei, 2016. "An exact decomposition algorithm for the generalized knapsack sharing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 761-774.
    14. R. K. Ahuja & J. B. Orlin & S. Pallottino & M. P. Scaparra & M. G. Scutellà, 2004. "A Multi-Exchange Heuristic for the Single-Source Capacitated Facility Location Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 749-760, June.
    15. Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2017. "Price of Fairness for allocating a bounded resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 933-943.
    16. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Liao, Wei-Hung, 2018. "An approximation algorithm for a competitive facility location problem with network effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 176-186.
    17. Anna Martínez-Gavara & Vicente Campos & Manuel Laguna & Rafael Martí, 2017. "Heuristic solution approaches for the maximum minsum dispersion problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 671-686, March.
    18. Thekra Al-douri & Mhand Hifi & Vassilis Zissimopoulos, 2021. "An iterative algorithm for the Max-Min knapsack problem with multiple scenarios," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1355-1392, June.
    19. Gaia Nicosia & Andrea Pacifici & Ulrich Pferschy, 2018. "Competitive multi-agent scheduling with an iterative selection rule," 4OR, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 15-29, March.
    20. Luca Bertazzi, 2012. "Minimum and Worst-Case Performance Ratios of Rollout Algorithms," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 378-393, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:233:y:2014:i:3:p:539-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.