IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v301y2022i3p841-854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new class of hard problem instances for the 0–1 knapsack problem

Author

Listed:
  • Jooken, Jorik
  • Leyman, Pieter
  • De Causmaecker, Patrick

Abstract

The 0–1 knapsack problem is an important optimization problem, because it arises as a special case of a wide variety of optimization problems and has been generalized in several ways. Decades of research have resulted in very powerful algorithms that can solve large knapsack problem instances involving thousands of decision variables in a short amount of time. Current problem instances in the literature no longer challenge these algorithms. However, hard problem instances are important to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of algorithms and this knowledge can in turn be used to create better performing algorithms. In this paper, we propose a new class of hard problem instances for the 0–1 knapsack problem and provide theoretical support that helps explain why these problem instances are hard to solve to optimality. A large dataset of 3240 hard problem instances was generated and subsequently solved on a supercomputer, using approximately 810 CPU-hours. The analysis of the obtained results shows to which extent different parameters influence the hardness of the problem instances. This analysis also demonstrates that the proposed problem instances are a lot harder than the previously known hardest instances, despite being much smaller.

Suggested Citation

  • Jooken, Jorik & Leyman, Pieter & De Causmaecker, Patrick, 2022. "A new class of hard problem instances for the 0–1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 841-854.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:301:y:2022:i:3:p:841-854
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172101016X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Achlioptas & Assaf Naor & Yuval Peres, 2005. "Rigorous location of phase transitions in hard optimization problems," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7043), pages 759-764, June.
    2. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    3. Caprara, Alberto & Kellerer, Hans & Pferschy, Ulrich & Pisinger, David, 2000. "Approximation algorithms for knapsack problems with cardinality constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 333-345, June.
    4. Jorik Jooken & Pieter Leyman & Patrick Causmaecker, 2020. "A multi-start local search algorithm for the Hamiltonian completion problem on undirected graphs," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 743-769, October.
    5. Hans Kellerer & Ulrich Pferschy, 2004. "Improved Dynamic Programming in Connection with an FPTAS for the Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 5-11, March.
    6. Egon Balas & Eitan Zemel, 1980. "An Algorithm for Large Zero-One Knapsack Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 1130-1154, October.
    7. George B. Dantzig, 1957. "Discrete-Variable Extremum Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 266-288, April.
    8. Martello, Silvano & Toth, Paolo, 1977. "An upper bound for the zero-one knapsack problem and a branch and bound algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 169-175, May.
    9. Eugene L. Lawler, 1963. "The Quadratic Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 586-599, July.
    10. Silvano Martello & David Pisinger & Paolo Toth, 1999. "Dynamic Programming and Strong Bounds for the 0-1 Knapsack Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 414-424, March.
    11. Hans Kellerer & Ulrich Pferschy, 1999. "A New Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for the Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 59-71, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing, Jin & Chi, Guotai & Pan, Ancheng, 2024. "Instance-dependent misclassification cost-sensitive learning for default prediction," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Liu, Chang & Smith-Miles, Kate & Wauters, Tony & Costa, Alysson M., 2024. "Instance space analysis for 2D bin packing mathematical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 484-498.
    3. Jooken, Jorik & Leyman, Pieter & De Causmaecker, Patrick, 2023. "Features for the 0-1 knapsack problem based on inclusionwise maximal solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 36-55.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mhand Hifi & Hedi Mhalla & Slim Sadfi, 2005. "Sensitivity of the Optimum to Perturbations of the Profit or Weight of an Item in the Binary Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 239-260, November.
    2. Pessoa, Artur Alves & Hahn, Peter M. & Guignard, Monique & Zhu, Yi-Rong, 2010. "Algorithms for the generalized quadratic assignment problem combining Lagrangean decomposition and the Reformulation-Linearization Technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 54-63, October.
    3. Silvano Martello & Paolo Toth, 2003. "An Exact Algorithm for the Two-Constraint 0--1 Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 826-835, October.
    4. Wishon, Christopher & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2016. "Robust efficiency measures for linear knapsack problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 398-409.
    5. Marc Goerigk, 2014. "A note on upper bounds to the robust knapsack problem with discrete scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 461-469, December.
    6. M Hifi & M Michrafy & A Sbihi, 2004. "Heuristic algorithms for the multiple-choice multidimensional knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1323-1332, December.
    7. Jooken, Jorik & Leyman, Pieter & De Causmaecker, Patrick, 2023. "Features for the 0-1 knapsack problem based on inclusionwise maximal solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 36-55.
    8. Luca Bertazzi, 2012. "Minimum and Worst-Case Performance Ratios of Rollout Algorithms," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 378-393, February.
    9. Martello, Silvano & Pisinger, David & Toth, Paolo, 2000. "New trends in exact algorithms for the 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 325-332, June.
    10. Yunpeng Sun & Ruoya Jia & Asif Razzaq & Qun Bao, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Drivers of China’s geographical renewable energy development: evidence from spatial association network structure approaches," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4115-4163, December.
    11. M Hifi & M Michrafy, 2006. "A reactive local search-based algorithm for the disjunctively constrained knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(6), pages 718-726, June.
    12. Sbihi, Abdelkader, 2010. "A cooperative local search-based algorithm for the Multiple-Scenario Max-Min Knapsack Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 339-346, April.
    13. Altay, Nezih & Robinson Jr., Powell E. & Bretthauer, Kurt M., 2008. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the mixed integer setup knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 598-609, November.
    14. Ghosh, Diptesh & Bandyopadhyay, Tathagata, 2006. "Spotting Difficult Weakly Correlated Binary Knapsack Problems," IIMA Working Papers WP2006-01-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Binh Thanh Dang & Tung Khac Truong, 2022. "Binary salp swarm algorithm for discounted {0-1} knapsack problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Pisinger, David, 1995. "An expanding-core algorithm for the exact 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 175-187, November.
    17. Huizhen Zhang & Cesar Beltran-Royo & Liang Ma, 2013. "Solving the quadratic assignment problem by means of general purpose mixed integer linear programming solvers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 261-278, August.
    18. Michel, S. & Perrot, N. & Vanderbeck, F., 2009. "Knapsack problems with setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 909-918, August.
    19. Jiming Peng & Tao Zhu & Hezhi Luo & Kim-Chuan Toh, 2015. "Semi-definite programming relaxation of quadratic assignment problems based on nonredundant matrix splitting," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 171-198, January.
    20. Tsesmetzis, Dimitrios & Roussaki, Ioanna & Sykas, Efstathios, 2008. "QoS-aware service evaluation and selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1101-1112, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:301:y:2022:i:3:p:841-854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.