IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v21y2021i2d10.1007_s12351-019-00463-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An iterative algorithm for the Max-Min knapsack problem with multiple scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Thekra Al-douri

    (EPROAD - EA 4669, Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

  • Mhand Hifi

    (EPROAD - EA 4669, Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

  • Vassilis Zissimopoulos

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to solve the max-min knapsack problem with multiple scenarios by using an iterative algorithm that uses three main phases: (1) construction phase, (2) improvement phase, and (3) destroying/repairing phase. The first phase yields a (starting) pool of elite solutions for the problem by applying a greedy randomized search. The second phase tries to improve each solution at hand by using an intensification search using path-relinking combined with a look-ahead strategy. The third phase can be viewed as a diversification strategy, where the iterative algorithm tries to avoid premature convergence towards local optima. Finally, the proposed method is evaluated on a set of benchmark instances taken from the literature. Its obtained results are compared to those reached by recent algorithms available in the literature. The computational part shows that the method remains competitive (in term of the quality of solutions achieved), where it is able to provide better bounds than those already published ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Thekra Al-douri & Mhand Hifi & Vassilis Zissimopoulos, 2021. "An iterative algorithm for the Max-Min knapsack problem with multiple scenarios," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1355-1392, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:21:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-019-00463-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-019-00463-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-019-00463-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-019-00463-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M Hifi & M Michrafy, 2006. "A reactive local search-based algorithm for the disjunctively constrained knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(6), pages 718-726, June.
    2. Manuel Laguna & Rafael Marti, 1999. "GRASP and Path Relinking for 2-Layer Straight Line Crossing Minimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 44-52, February.
    3. George B. Dantzig, 1957. "Discrete-Variable Extremum Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 266-288, April.
    4. Christopher S. Tang, 1988. "A Max-Min Allocation Problem: Its Solutions and Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 359-367, April.
    5. Dahmani, Isma & Hifi, Mhand & Wu, Lei, 2016. "An exact decomposition algorithm for the generalized knapsack sharing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 761-774.
    6. Yamada, Takeo & Futakawa, Mayumi & Kataoka, Seiji, 1998. "Some exact algorithms for the knapsack sharing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 177-183, April.
    7. Gang Yu, 1996. "On the Max-Min 0-1 Knapsack Problem with Robust Optimization Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 407-415, April.
    8. Fujimoto, Masako & Yamada, Takeo, 2006. "An exact algorithm for the knapsack sharing problem with common items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 693-707, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sbihi, Abdelkader, 2010. "A cooperative local search-based algorithm for the Multiple-Scenario Max-Min Knapsack Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 339-346, April.
    2. Fatma-Zohra Baatout & Mhand Hifi, 2023. "A two-phase hybrid evolutionary algorithm for solving the bi-objective scheduling multiprocessor tasks on two dedicated processors," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 229-267, June.
    3. Fujimoto, Masako & Yamada, Takeo, 2006. "An exact algorithm for the knapsack sharing problem with common items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 693-707, June.
    4. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    5. Isma Dahmani & Mhand Hifi, 2021. "A modified descent method-based heuristic for binary quadratic knapsack problems with conflict graphs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 125-147, March.
    6. Dahmani, Isma & Hifi, Mhand & Wu, Lei, 2016. "An exact decomposition algorithm for the generalized knapsack sharing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 761-774.
    7. Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2017. "Price of Fairness for allocating a bounded resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 933-943.
    8. Martello, Silvano & Pisinger, David & Toth, Paolo, 2000. "New trends in exact algorithms for the 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 325-332, June.
    9. Hassin, Refael & Sarid, Anna, 2018. "Operations research applications of dichotomous search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 795-812.
    10. B. Golany & N. Goldberg & U. Rothblum, 2015. "Allocating multiple defensive resources in a zero-sum game setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 91-109, February.
    11. Alexandre Belloni & Mitchell J. Lovett & William Boulding & Richard Staelin, 2012. "Optimal Admission and Scholarship Decisions: Choosing Customized Marketing Offers to Attract a Desirable Mix of Customers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 621-636, July.
    12. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2020. "On the difficulty of budget allocation in claims problems with indivisible items of different prices," ThE Papers 20/09, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    13. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "On the Difficulty of Budget Allocation in Claims Problems with Indivisible Items and Prices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1133-1159, October.
    14. Andrea Bettinelli & Valentina Cacchiani & Enrico Malaguti, 2017. "A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Knapsack Problem with Conflict Graph," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 457-473, August.
    15. Rafael Martí & Abraham Duarte & Manuel Laguna, 2009. "Advanced Scatter Search for the Max-Cut Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 26-38, February.
    16. Napoletano, Antonio & Martínez-Gavara, Anna & Festa, Paola & Pastore, Tommaso & Martí, Rafael, 2019. "Heuristics for the Constrained Incremental Graph Drawing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 710-729.
    17. Yanhong Feng & Xu Yu & Gai-Ge Wang, 2019. "A Novel Monarch Butterfly Optimization with Global Position Updating Operator for Large-Scale 0-1 Knapsack Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-31, November.
    18. Altay, Nezih & Robinson Jr., Powell E. & Bretthauer, Kurt M., 2008. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the mixed integer setup knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 598-609, November.
    19. Bian, Zheyong & Bai, Yun & Douglas, W. Scott & Maher, Ali & Liu, Xiang, 2022. "Multi-year planning for optimal navigation channel dredging and dredged material management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Alireza Amirteimoori & Simin Masrouri, 2021. "DEA-based competition strategy in the presence of undesirable products: An application to paper mills," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(2), pages 5-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:21:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-019-00463-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.