IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v216y2012i2p397-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multistage stochastic portfolio optimisation in deregulated electricity markets using linear decision rules

Author

Listed:
  • Rocha, Paula
  • Kuhn, Daniel

Abstract

The deregulation of electricity markets increases the financial risk faced by retailers who procure electric energy on the spot market to meet their customers’ electricity demand. To hedge against this exposure, retailers often hold a portfolio of electricity derivative contracts. In this paper, we propose a multistage stochastic mean–variance optimisation model for the management of such a portfolio. To reduce computational complexity, we apply two approximations: we aggregate the decision stages and solve the resulting problem in linear decision rules (LDR). The LDR approach consists of restricting the set of recourse decisions to those affine in the history of the random parameters. When applied to mean–variance optimisation models, it leads to convex quadratic programs. Since their size grows typically only polynomially with the number of periods, they can be efficiently solved. Our numerical experiments illustrate the value of adaptivity inherent in the LDR method and its potential for enabling scalability to problems with many periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocha, Paula & Kuhn, Daniel, 2012. "Multistage stochastic portfolio optimisation in deregulated electricity markets using linear decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 397-408.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:216:y:2012:i:2:p:397-408
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711007132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mount, Timothy D. & Ning, Yumei & Cai, Xiaobin, 2006. "Predicting price spikes in electricity markets using a regime-switching model with time-varying parameters," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 62-80, January.
    2. Alexander Shapiro, 2003. "Inference of statistical bounds for multistage stochastic programming problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 58(1), pages 57-68, September.
    3. Geyer, Alois & Hanke, Michael & Weissensteiner, Alex, 2010. "No-arbitrage conditions, scenario trees, and multi-asset financial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 609-613, November.
    4. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "A Linear Decision-Based Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 344-357, April.
    5. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    6. Aharon Ben-Tal & Boaz Golany & Arkadi Nemirovski & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2005. "Retailer-Supplier Flexible Commitments Contracts: A Robust Optimization Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 248-271, February.
    7. Klaassen, Pieter, 1997. "Discretized reality and spurious profits in stochastic programming models for asset/liability management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 374-392, September.
    8. Jitka Dupačová & Giorgio Consigli & Stein Wallace, 2000. "Scenarios for Multistage Stochastic Programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 25-53, December.
    9. Michael S. Casey & Suvrajeet Sen, 2005. "The Scenario Generation Algorithm for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 615-631, August.
    10. Deng, S.J. & Oren, S.S., 2006. "Electricity derivatives and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 940-953.
    11. Suvrajeet Sen & Lihua Yu & Talat Genc, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to Power Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 55-72, February.
    12. Alper Atamtürk & Muhong Zhang, 2007. "Two-Stage Robust Network Flow and Design Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 662-673, August.
    13. Angelos Georghiou & Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn, 2010. "Generalized Decision Rule Approximations for Stochastic Programming via Liftings," Working Papers 043, COMISEF.
    14. Klaassen, Pieter, 1997. "Discretized reality and spurious profits in stochastic programming models for asset/liability management," Serie Research Memoranda 0011, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    15. Teemu Pennanen, 2005. "Epi-Convergent Discretizations of Multistage Stochastic Programs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 245-256, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Staino, Alessandro & Russo, Emilio, 2015. "A moment-matching method to generate arbitrage-free scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 619-630.
    2. de Lange, Petter E. & Fleten, Stein-Erik & Gaivoronski, Alexei A., 2004. "Modeling financial reinsurance in the casualty insurance business via stochastic programming," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 991-1012, February.
    3. Gulpinar, Nalan & Rustem, Berc & Settergren, Reuben, 2004. "Simulation and optimization approaches to scenario tree generation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1291-1315, April.
    4. D. Kuhn, 2009. "Convergent Bounds for Stochastic Programs with Expected Value Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 597-618, June.
    5. Michael Chen & Sanjay Mehrotra & Dávid Papp, 2015. "Scenario generation for stochastic optimization problems via the sparse grid method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 669-692, December.
    6. Haolin Ruan & Zhi Chen & Chin Pang Ho, 2023. "Adjustable Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1002-1023, September.
    7. Jianzhe Zhen & Ahmadreza Marandi & Danique de Moor & Dick den Hertog & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2022. "Disjoint Bilinear Optimization: A Two-Stage Robust Optimization Perspective," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2410-2427, September.
    8. Boris Defourny & Damien Ernst & Louis Wehenkel, 2013. "Scenario Trees and Policy Selection for Multistage Stochastic Programming Using Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 488-501, August.
    9. Barro, Diana & Consigli, Giorgio & Varun, Vivek, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for dynamic portfolio management with financial derivatives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Deng, Shi-Jie & Xu, Li, 2009. "Mean-risk efficient portfolio analysis of demand response and supply resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1523-1529.
    11. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Xin Chen & Yuhan Zhang, 2009. "Uncertain Linear Programs: Extended Affinely Adjustable Robust Counterparts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1469-1482, December.
    13. Gah-Yi Ban & Jérémie Gallien & Adam J. Mersereau, 2019. "Dynamic Procurement of New Products with Covariate Information: The Residual Tree Method," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 798-815, October.
    14. Geyer, Alois & Hanke, Michael & Weissensteiner, Alex, 2010. "No-arbitrage conditions, scenario trees, and multi-asset financial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 609-613, November.
    15. Angelos Georghiou & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "The decision rule approach to optimization under uncertainty: methodology and applications," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 545-576, October.
    16. Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2021. "A Review of Robust Operations Management under Model Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1927-1943, June.
    17. Woo, C.K. & Zarnikau, J. & Moore, J. & Horowitz, I., 2011. "Wind generation and zonal-market price divergence: Evidence from Texas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 3928-3938, July.
    18. Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri & Michael R. Wagner, 2017. "Closed-Form Solutions for Robust Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1625-1643, May.
    19. Lei, Kaixuan & Chang, Jianxia & Long, Ruihao & Wang, Yimin & Zhang, Hongxue, 2022. "Cascade hydropower station risk operation under the condition of inflow uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    20. Qing-chun Meng & Xiao-le Wan & Xiao-xia Rong, 2015. "A Robust Ordering Strategy for Retailers Facing a Free Shipping Option," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:216:y:2012:i:2:p:397-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.