IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v199y2009i3p674-683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic algorithm based approach for the integrated airline crew-pairing and rostering problem

Author

Listed:
  • Souai, Nadia
  • Teghem, Jacques

Abstract

Airline crew scheduling problem is a complex and difficult problem faced by all airline companies. To tackle this problem, it was often decomposed into two subproblems solved successively. First, the airline crew-pairing problem, which consists on finding a set of trips - called pairings - i.e. sequences of flights, starting and ending at a crew base, that cover all the flights planned for a given period of time. Secondly, the airline crew rostering problem, which consists on assigning the pairings found by solving the first subproblem, to the named airline crew members. For both problems, several rules and regulations must be respected and costs minimized. It is sure that this decomposition provides a convenient tool to handle the numerous and complex restrictions, but it lacks, however, of a global treatment of the problem. For this purpose, in this study we took the challenge of proposing a new way to solve both subproblems simultaneously. The proposed approach is based on a hybrid genetic algorithm. In fact, three heuristics are developed here to tackle the restriction rules within the GA's process.

Suggested Citation

  • Souai, Nadia & Teghem, Jacques, 2009. "Genetic algorithm based approach for the integrated airline crew-pairing and rostering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 674-683, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:3:p:674-683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(08)00365-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balaji Gopalakrishnan & Ellis. Johnson, 2005. "Airline Crew Scheduling: State-of-the-Art," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 305-337, November.
    2. Zeghal, F.M. & Minoux, M., 2006. "Modeling and solving a Crew Assignment Problem in air transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 187-209, November.
    3. Guo, Yufeng & Mellouli, Taieb & Suhl, Leena & Thiel, Markus P., 2006. "A partially integrated airline crew scheduling approach with time-dependent crew capacities and multiple home bases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 1169-1181, June.
    4. Chang, Shaw Ching, 2002. "A new aircrew-scheduling model for short-haul routes," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 249-260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salazar-González, Juan-José, 2014. "Approaches to solve the fleet-assignment, aircraft-routing, crew-pairing and crew-rostering problems of a regional carrier," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 71-82.
    2. Quesnel, Frédéric & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François, 2020. "A branch-and-price heuristic for the crew pairing problem with language constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1040-1054.
    3. Vahid Zeighami & François Soumis, 2019. "Combining Benders’ Decomposition and Column Generation for Integrated Crew Pairing and Personalized Crew Assignment Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1479-1499, September.
    4. Jesica Armas & Luis Cadarso & Angel A. Juan & Javier Faulin, 2017. "A multi-start randomized heuristic for real-life crew rostering problems in airlines with work-balancing goals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 825-848, November.
    5. Xiao, Mei & Chien, Steven & Schonfeld, Paul & Hu, Dawei, 2020. "Optimizing flight equencing and gate assignment considering terminal configuration and walking time," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Weihao Ouyang & Xiaohong Zhu, 2023. "Meta-Heuristic Solver with Parallel Genetic Algorithm Framework in Airline Crew Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Frédéric Quesnel & Guy Desaulniers & Frédéric Quesnel, 2020. "Improving Air Crew Rostering by Considering Crew Preferences in the Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 97-114, January.
    8. Mohamed Haouari & Farah Zeghal Mansour & Hanif D. Sherali, 2019. "A New Compact Formulation for the Daily Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 811-828, May.
    9. Nishi, Tatsushi & Sugiyama, Taichi & Inuiguchi, Masahiro, 2014. "Two-level decomposition algorithm for crew rostering problems with fair working condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 465-473.
    10. Atoosa Kasirzadeh & Mohammed Saddoune & François Soumis, 2017. "Airline crew scheduling: models, algorithms, and data sets," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 111-137, June.
    11. Doi, Tsubasa & Nishi, Tatsushi & Voß, Stefan, 2018. "Two-level decomposition-based matheuristic for airline crew rostering problems with fair working time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 428-438.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atoosa Kasirzadeh & Mohammed Saddoune & François Soumis, 2017. "Airline crew scheduling: models, algorithms, and data sets," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 111-137, June.
    2. Mohamed Haouari & Farah Zeghal Mansour & Hanif D. Sherali, 2019. "A New Compact Formulation for the Daily Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 811-828, May.
    3. Frédéric Quesnel & Guy Desaulniers & Frédéric Quesnel, 2020. "Improving Air Crew Rostering by Considering Crew Preferences in the Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 97-114, January.
    4. Zeighami, Vahid & Saddoune, Mohammed & Soumis, François, 2020. "Alternating Lagrangian decomposition for integrated airline crew scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 211-224.
    5. Saddoune, Mohammed & Desaulniers, Guy & Elhallaoui, Issmail & Soumis, François, 2011. "Integrated airline crew scheduling: A bi-dynamic constraint aggregation method using neighborhoods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 445-454, August.
    6. Vahid Zeighami & François Soumis, 2019. "Combining Benders’ Decomposition and Column Generation for Integrated Crew Pairing and Personalized Crew Assignment Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1479-1499, September.
    7. Mohammed Saddoune & Guy Desaulniers & Issmail Elhallaoui & François Soumis, 2012. "Integrated Airline Crew Pairing and Crew Assignment by Dynamic Constraint Aggregation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 39-55, February.
    8. Gamermann, Ronaldo W. & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2023. "Long-term audit staff scheduling and planning: A case study of Brazilian civil aviation authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Rodríguez-Sanz, à lvaro & Fernández de Marcos, Alberto & Pérez-Castán, Javier A. & Comendador, Fernando Gómez & Arnaldo Valdés, Rosa & París Loreiro, à ngel, 2021. "Queue behavioural patterns for passengers at airport terminals: A machine learning approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Jesica Armas & Luis Cadarso & Angel A. Juan & Javier Faulin, 2017. "A multi-start randomized heuristic for real-life crew rostering problems in airlines with work-balancing goals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 825-848, November.
    11. Vaidyanathan, Balachandran, 2007. "Multi-Commodity Network Flow Based Approaches for the Railroad Crew Scheduling Problem," 48th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, March 15-17, 2007 207928, Transportation Research Forum.
    12. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    13. Doi, Tsubasa & Nishi, Tatsushi & Voß, Stefan, 2018. "Two-level decomposition-based matheuristic for airline crew rostering problems with fair working time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 428-438.
    14. Di Martinelly, Christine & Meskens, Nadine, 2017. "A bi-objective integrated approach to building surgical teams and nurse schedule rosters to maximise surgical team affinities and minimise nurses' idle time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 323-334.
    15. Sanja Petrovic, 2019. "“You have to get wet to learn how to swim” applied to bridging the gap between research into personnel scheduling and its implementation in practice," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(1), pages 161-179, April.
    16. Jordi Castro & Fernando Sarachaga, 2021. "An online optimization-based procedure for the assignment of airplane seats," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 204-247, April.
    17. Masood Kiarashrad & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh & Mohammad Mohammadi, 2021. "A mixed-integer nonlinear optimization model for integrated flight scheduling, fleet assignment, and ticket pricing in competitive market," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 596-607, October.
    18. Hannah K. Smalley & Pınar Keskinocak & Atul Vats, 2015. "Physician Scheduling for Continuity: An Application in Pediatric Intensive Care," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 133-148, April.
    19. Quesnel, Frédéric & Desaulniers, Guy & Soumis, François, 2020. "A branch-and-price heuristic for the crew pairing problem with language constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1040-1054.
    20. Şahin, Güvenç & Yüceoğlu, Birol, 2011. "Tactical crew planning in railways," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1221-1243.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:199:y:2009:i:3:p:674-683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.