IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v339y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05702-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of resource sharing in emergency response using data-driven analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Jifan Zhang

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Salih Tutun

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Samira Fazel Anvaryazdi

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Mohammadhossein Amini

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Durai Sundaramoorthi

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Hema Sundaramoorthi

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

Abstract

This research models a medical resource-sharing problem with three powerful techniques in analytics: mixed-integer linear programming (MILP), deep q-learning (DQL), and double deep q-learning (DDQL). These models can be utilized by a group of collaborating entities in emergency situations to decide how they share resources and mitigate adverse effects on human lives. Due to the sudden spikes in demand, the allocation of healthcare resources becomes dynamic in nature. Medical resource management underwent an unprecedented level of difficulty in the modern history of our healthcare system because of the Coronavirus pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, we witnessed a severe shortage of ventilators in several countries including in the U.S. Followed by that, there was a severe shortage of Oxygen supply in treating patients who tested positive for the virus in India. Many lives were unnecessarily lost because of the lack of a resource-sharing framework to use in an adverse situation. When a hospital or region experiences sudden spikes in demand for resources, the key decision involves sending resources from other places. Especially, a swift optimal decision has to be made regarding who will send the resources and when will it be sent to the places of need. To tackle this problem, we developed three analytics models—MILP, DQL, and DDQL—based on the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)’s public data of ventilator allocation. To the best of our knowledge, DQL and DDQL are introduced in this context for the first time. Our models can be used either to share critical resources between collaborators or transfer patients between the locations of the collaborators. We devise two policies for DQL and DDQL models while optimizing the parameters in them. We call these policies the normal policy and the just ship policy. The just ship policy promptly ships healthcare resources to save patients in other locations even at the risk of not meeting its own demand in the future. The normal policy allows saving resources at a location so that future demands are met at the location rather than satisfying the current demand at other locations. To demonstrate the performance of our models, we applied our models to the IHME’s ventilator data and present the results for all fifty states in the U.S. We show how these models optimize ventilator allocations assuming that all the fifty states collaborate as a task force and implement the solution that emerges from the analytics. The experimental results show that the proposed models are effective in handling the resource sharing problem presented by Covid-19. This research provides a decision-making framework for resource allocation during any disease outbreak, such as, new variants of coronavirus and other outbreaks like monkey-pox.

Suggested Citation

  • Jifan Zhang & Salih Tutun & Samira Fazel Anvaryazdi & Mohammadhossein Amini & Durai Sundaramoorthi & Hema Sundaramoorthi, 2024. "Management of resource sharing in emergency response using data-driven analytics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 663-692, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05702-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05702-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05702-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05702-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong Li & Li Ding & Stephen Connor, 2020. "When to Switch? Index Policies for Resource Scheduling in Emergency Response," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 241-262, February.
    2. Andrew J. Schaefer & Ellis L. Johnson & Anton J. Kleywegt & George L. Nemhauser, 2005. "Airline Crew Scheduling Under Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 340-348, August.
    3. Balaji Gopalakrishnan & Ellis. Johnson, 2005. "Airline Crew Scheduling: State-of-the-Art," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 305-337, November.
    4. Durai Sundaramoorthi & Victoria Chen & Jay Rosenberger & Seoung Kim & Deborah Buckley-Behan, 2009. "A data-integrated simulation model to evaluate nurse–patient assignments," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 252-268, September.
    5. Alex F. Mills & Jonathan E. Helm & Yu Wang, 2021. "Surge Capacity Deployment in Hospitals: Effectiveness of Response and Mitigation Strategies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 367-387, March.
    6. Victoria C. P. Chen & David Ruppert & Christine A. Shoemaker, 1999. "Applying Experimental Design and Regression Splines to High-Dimensional Continuous-State Stochastic Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 38-53, February.
    7. Amir Mosavi & Pedram Ghamisi & Yaser Faghan & Puhong Duan, 2020. "Comprehensive Review of Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods and Applications in Economics," Papers 2004.01509, arXiv.org.
    8. Sarang Deo & Seyed Iravani & Tingting Jiang & Karen Smilowitz & Stephen Samuelson, 2013. "Improving Health Outcomes Through Better Capacity Allocation in a Community-Based Chronic Care Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1277-1294, December.
    9. Catherine H. Tinsley & Robin L. Dillon & Matthew A. Cronin, 2012. "How Near-Miss Events Amplify or Attenuate Risky Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1596-1613, September.
    10. Ellis L. Johnson, 1967. "Optimality and Computation of (\sigma, S) Policies in the Multi-Item Infinite Horizon Inventory Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(7), pages 475-491, March.
    11. Linda V. Green & Peter J. Kolesar, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Improving Emergency Responsiveness with Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(8), pages 1001-1014, August.
    12. Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W.P. Savelsbergh, 2000. "Progress in Linear Programming-Based Algorithms for Integer Programming: An Exposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 2-23, February.
    13. Al-Ebbini, Lina & Oztekin, Asil & Chen, Yao, 2016. "FLAS: Fuzzy lung allocation system for US-based transplantations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1051-1065.
    14. Sang-Hyun Kim & Morris A. Cohen & Serguei Netessine & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2010. "Contracting for Infrequent Restoration and Recovery of Mission-Critical Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(9), pages 1551-1567, September.
    15. Yusen Ye & Wen Jiao & Hong Yan, 2020. "Managing Relief Inventories Responding to Natural Disasters: Gaps Between Practice and Literature," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 807-832, April.
    16. Cynthia Barnhart & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & Pamela H. Vance, 1998. "Branch-and-Price: Column Generation for Solving Huge Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 316-329, June.
    17. Duraikannan Sundaramoorthi & Victoria Chen & Jay Rosenberger & Seoung Kim & Deborah Buckley-Behan, 2010. "A data-integrated simulation-based optimization for assigning nurses to patient admissions," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 210-221, September.
    18. Robin L. Dillon & Catherine H. Tinsley, 2008. "How Near-Misses Influence Decision Making Under Risk: A Missed Opportunity for Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1425-1440, August.
    19. Woonghee Tim Huh & Nan Liu & Van-Anh Truong, 2013. "Multiresource Allocation Scheduling in Dynamic Environments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 280-291, May.
    20. Allen R. Ferguson & George B. Dantzig, 1956. "The Allocation of Aircraft to Routes--An Example of Linear Programming Under Uncertain Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 45-73, October.
    21. Sushil Gupta & Martin K. Starr & Reza Zanjirani Farahani & Niki Matinrad, 2016. "Disaster Management from a POM Perspective: Mapping a New Domain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(10), pages 1611-1637, October.
    22. E J Lodree Jr & S Taskin, 2008. "An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(5), pages 674-684, May.
    23. Mosavi, Amir & Faghan, Yaser & Ghamisi, Pedram & Duan, Puhong & Ardabili, Sina Faizollahzadeh & Hassan, Salwana & Band, Shahab S., 2020. "Comprehensive Review of Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods and Applications in Economics," OSF Preprints jrc58, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    2. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2024. "Mass evacuation planning for disasters management: A household evacuation route choice behavior analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Mohamed Haouari & Farah Zeghal Mansour & Hanif D. Sherali, 2019. "A New Compact Formulation for the Daily Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 811-828, May.
    4. Abdelouahab Zaghrouti & Issmail El Hallaoui & François Soumis, 2020. "Improving set partitioning problem solutions by zooming around an improving direction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(2), pages 645-671, January.
    5. Kirsten Hoffmann & Udo Buscher & Janis Sebastian Neufeld & Felix Tamke, 2017. "Solving Practical Railway Crew Scheduling Problems with Attendance Rates," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(3), pages 147-159, June.
    6. Mohammed Saddoune & Guy Desaulniers & Issmail Elhallaoui & François Soumis, 2012. "Integrated Airline Crew Pairing and Crew Assignment by Dynamic Constraint Aggregation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 39-55, February.
    7. Okan Örsan Özener & Melda Örmeci Matoğlu & Güneş Erdoğan & Mohamed Haouari & Hasan Sözer, 2017. "Solving a large-scale integrated fleet assignment and crew pairing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 477-500, June.
    8. Peter Madsen & Robin L. Dillon & Catherine H. Tinsley, 2016. "Airline Safety Improvement Through Experience with Near‐Misses: A Cautionary Tale," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 1054-1066, May.
    9. Barry C. Smith & Ellis L. Johnson, 2006. "Robust Airline Fleet Assignment: Imposing Station Purity Using Station Decomposition," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 497-516, November.
    10. Charl Maree & Christian W. Omlin, 2022. "Balancing Profit, Risk, and Sustainability for Portfolio Management," Papers 2207.02134, arXiv.org.
    11. Ali, Agha Iqbal & O'Connor, Debra J., 2010. "The impact of distribution system characteristics on computational tractability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 323-333, January.
    12. Jesica Armas & Luis Cadarso & Angel A. Juan & Javier Faulin, 2017. "A multi-start randomized heuristic for real-life crew rostering problems in airlines with work-balancing goals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 825-848, November.
    13. Borgonjon, Tessa & Maenhout, Broos, 2022. "An exact approach for the personnel task rescheduling problem with task retiming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 465-484.
    14. Ben Hambly & Renyuan Xu & Huining Yang, 2021. "Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Finance," Papers 2112.04553, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    15. Philippe Racette & Frédéric Quesnel & Andrea Lodi & François Soumis, 2024. "Gaining insight into crew rostering instances through ML-based sequential assignment," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(3), pages 537-578, October.
    16. Michelle Dunbar & Gary Froyland & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2012. "Robust Airline Schedule Planning: Minimizing Propagated Delay in an Integrated Routing and Crewing Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 204-216, May.
    17. Heinrich, Timo & Seifert, Matthias & Then, Franziska, 2020. "Near-losses in insurance markets: An experiment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    19. John McClure & David Johnston & Liv Henrich & Taciano Milfont & Julia Becker, 2015. "When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 635-652, January.
    20. Brini, Alessio & Tedeschi, Gabriele & Tantari, Daniele, 2023. "Reinforcement learning policy recommendation for interbank network stability," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:339:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05702-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.