IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v105y1998i3p494-501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling under a common due-data on parallel unrelated machines

Author

Listed:
  • Adamopoulos, George I.
  • Pappis, Costas P.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Adamopoulos, George I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1998. "Scheduling under a common due-data on parallel unrelated machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 494-501, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:105:y:1998:i:3:p:494-501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(97)00057-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. S. Panwalkar & M. L. Smith & A. Seidmann, 1982. "Common Due Date Assignment to Minimize Total Penalty for the One Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 391-399, April.
    2. Panwalkar, S. S. & Rajagopalan, R., 1992. "Single-machine sequencing with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 298-302, June.
    3. Cheng, T. C. E., 1988. "An alternative proof of optimality for the common due-date assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 250-253, November.
    4. Hamilton Emmons, 1987. "Scheduling to a common due date on parallel uniform processors," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 803-810, December.
    5. Uttarayan Bagchi & Yih‐Long Chang & Robert S. Sullivan, 1987. "Minimizing absolute and squared deviations of completion times with different earliness and tardiness penalties and a common due date," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 739-751, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Janiak, Adam & Janiak, Władysław A. & Krysiak, Tomasz & Kwiatkowski, Tomasz, 2015. "A survey on scheduling problems with due windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 347-357.
    3. Li, Heng & Li, Zhicheng & Li, Ling X. & Hu, Bin, 2000. "A production rescheduling expert simulation system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 283-293, July.
    4. Chen, Zhi-Long & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2002. "Parallel machine scheduling with a common due window," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 512-527, February.
    5. Weng, Michael X. & Lu, John & Ren, Haiying, 2001. "Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with setup consideration and a total weighted completion time objective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 215-226, April.
    6. Anzanello, Michel J. & Fogliatto, Flavio S. & Santos, Luana, 2014. "Learning dependent job scheduling in mass customized scenarios considering ergonomic factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 136-145.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adamopoulos, George I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1996. "A fuzzy-linguistic approach to a multi-criteria sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 628-636, August.
    2. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.
    4. X. Cai & S. Zhou, 1997. "Scheduling stochastic jobs with asymmetric earliness and tardiness penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(6), pages 531-557, September.
    5. Sridharan, V. & Zhou, Z., 1996. "A decision theory based scheduling procedure for single-machine weighted earliness and tardiness problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 292-301, October.
    6. Leyvand, Yaron & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2010. "A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 301-312, October.
    7. Bernard Dickman & Yonah Wilamowsky & Sheldon Epstein, 2001. "Multiple common due dates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 293-298, June.
    8. Zhi-Long Chen, 1997. "Scheduling with batch setup times and earliness-tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 518-537, February.
    9. T C E Cheng & L Y Kang & C T Ng, 2007. "Due-date assignment and parallel-machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 1103-1108, August.
    10. Cheng, T. C. E. & Oguz, C. & Qi, X. D., 1996. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with compressible processing times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 29-35, May.
    11. Koulamas, Christos & Gupta, Sushil & Kyparisis, George J., 2010. "A unified analysis for the single-machine scheduling problem with controllable and non-controllable variable job processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 479-482, September.
    12. Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Lejmi, Tahar, 1999. "Scheduling for non regular performance measure under the due window approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 555-568, October.
    13. Biskup, Dirk & Jahnke, Hermann, 2001. "Common due date assignment for scheduling on a single machine with jointly reducible processing times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 317-322, February.
    14. S.S. Panwalkar & Christos Koulamas, 2015. "On equivalence between the proportionate flow shop and single‐machine scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(7), pages 595-603, October.
    15. Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George & Zhang, Rui, 2016. "Optimal coordination of resource allocation, due date assignment and scheduling decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-54.
    16. Cheng, T. C. E. & Oguz, C. & Qi, X. D., 1996. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with compressible processing times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 107-113, June.
    17. Biskup, Dirk, 1999. "Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 173-178, May.
    18. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2008. "The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 25-40, March.
    19. Dvir Shabtay, 2023. "A new perspective on single-machine scheduling problems with late work related criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 947-966, March.
    20. Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2014. "Single machine just‐in‐time scheduling problems with two competing agents," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(1), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:105:y:1998:i:3:p:494-501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.