IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eejocm/v46y2023ics1755534522000513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R packages and tutorial for case 1 best–worst scaling

Author

Listed:
  • Aizaki, Hideo
  • Fogarty, James

Abstract

Case 1 best–worst scaling (BWS1) has been used in a wide variety of research fields. BWS1 is attractive, relative to discrete choice experiments, because individual’s preferences for items can be easily measured. Despite the relative ease of implementation, BWS1 analysis still requires the use of software packages. When used in conjunction with other packages, the new and revised functions in the package support.BWS allow BWS1 analysis to be conducted using either the counting approach or the modeling approach. Additionally, a new function that simulates responses to BWS1 questions allows discipline specific BWS1 examples to be created for teaching purposes. To make it easier for novice users to implement BWS1 analysis with R, the package RcmdrPlugin.BWS1, that integrates with R Commander has been developed. A free web tutorial for BWS1 in R has also been developed. This paper explains the features of the latest version of support.BWS, along with the new package RcmdrPlugin.BWS1, and illustrates how these packages work.

Suggested Citation

  • Aizaki, Hideo & Fogarty, James, 2023. "R packages and tutorial for case 1 best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:46:y:2023:i:c:s1755534522000513
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534522000513
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molloy, Joseph & Becker, Felix & Schmid, Basil & Axhausen, Kay W., 2021. "mixl: An open-source R package for estimating complex choice models on large datasets," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, January.
    3. Sarrias, Mauricio & Daziano, Ricardo, 2017. "Multinomial Logit Models with Continuous and Discrete Individual Heterogeneity in R: The gmnl Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 79(i02).
    4. Aizaki, Hideo, 2012. "Basic Functions for Supporting an Implementation of Choice Experiments in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 50(c02).
    5. Flynn, Terry N. & Louviere, Jordan J. & Peters, Tim J. & Coast, Joanna, 2007. "Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 171-189, January.
    6. ., 2021. "Introduction to Organization in the Economic Firm," Chapters, in: Organization in the Economic Firm, chapter 1, pages 1-7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Pat Auger & Timothy Devinney & Jordan Louviere, 2007. "Using Best–Worst Scaling Methodology to Investigate Consumer Ethical Beliefs Across Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 299-326, February.
    8. ., 2021. "Introduction to State and Local Financial Instruments," Chapters, in: State and Local Financial Instruments, chapter 1, pages 1-22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Aizaki, Hideo & Fogarty, James, 2019. "An R package and tutorial for case 2 best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    10. ., 2021. "Introduction to Neoliberal Social Justice," Chapters, in: Neoliberal Social Justice, chapter 1, pages 1-19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Loureiro, Maria L. & Dominguez Arcos, Fernando, 2012. "Applying Best–Worst Scaling in a stated preference analysis of forest management programs," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 381-394.
    12. Newman, Claire & Briggeman, Brian C., 2016. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Building Trust," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, August.
    13. McKENDREE, MELISSA G.S. & TONSOR, GLYNN T. & WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A., 2018. "Animal Welfare Perceptions Of The U.S. Public And Cow-Calf Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 544-578, November.
    14. Louviere, Jordan & Lings, Ian & Islam, Towhidul & Gudergan, Siegfried & Flynn, Terry, 2013. "An introduction to the application of (case 1) best–worst scaling in marketing research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 292-303.
    15. Jordan Louviere & Terry Flynn, 2010. "Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 3(4), pages 275-283, December.
    16. ., 2021. "Introduction to Part IV," Chapters, in: Strategic Community Partnerships, Philanthropy, and Nongovernmental Organization, chapter 16, pages 113-114, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. White, Mark H., 2021. "bwsTools: An R package for case 1 best-worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    18. ., 2021. "Introduction to Part II," Chapters, in: Strategic Community Partnerships, Philanthropy, and Nongovernmental Organization, chapter 4, pages 28-29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Sirieix, Lucie & Remaud, Hervé & Lockshin, Larry & Thach, Liz & Lease, Terry, 2011. "Determinants of restaurant's owners/managers selection of wines to be offered on the wine list," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 500-508.
    20. Menictas, Con & Wang, Paul Z. & Louviere, Jordan J., 2012. "Assessing the validity of brand equity constructs," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-8.
    21. Robert Osei-Kyei & Albert P. C. Chan, 2021. "Introduction to the Public-Private Partnership Concept," Springer Books, in: International Best Practices of Public-Private Partnership, chapter 0, pages 1-11, Springer.
    22. ., 2021. "Introduction: how to bring the silos together," Chapters, in: Public Policy in Contentious Times, chapter 1, pages 1-9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    23. ., 2021. "Introduction to Part III," Chapters, in: Strategic Community Partnerships, Philanthropy, and Nongovernmental Organization, chapter 10, pages 71-71, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    24. Elizabeth S. Byrd & Nicole J. Olynk Widmar & Benjamin M. Gramig, 2018. "Presentation matters: Number of attributes presented impacts estimated preferences," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 377-389, March.
    25. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    26. ., 2021. "Introduction: how to be a reflexive researcher," Chapters, in: How to be a Reflexive Researcher, chapter 1, pages 1-14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    27. Axel C. Mühlbacher & Anika Kaczynski & Peter Zweifel & F. Reed Johnson, 2016. "Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    28. Fox, John, 2005. "The R Commander: A Basic-Statistics Graphical User Interface to R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 14(i09).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masayuki Sato & Toshifumi Minamoto & Atushi Ushimaru, 2023. "An interdisciplinary approach to environmental conservation policy: a case of Satoyama redevelopment in the peri-urban area," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 403-419, August.
    2. Áron Török & Ching-Hua Yeh & Davide Menozzi & Péter Balogh & Péter Czine, 2023. "Consumers' preferences for processed meat: a best–worst scaling approach in three European countries," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mikyung Kelly Seo & Mark Strong, 2021. "A Practical Guide to Modeling and Conducting a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Companion Biomarker Tests for Targeted Therapies Using R: Tutorial Paper," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(12), pages 1373-1381, December.
    2. Erdem, Seda & Rigby, Dan & Wossink, Ada, 2012. "Using best–worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 661-670.
    3. Marti, Joachim, 2012. "A best–worst scaling survey of adolescents' level of concern for health and non-health consequences of smoking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 87-97.
    4. Rausch, Theresa Maria & Baier, Daniel & Wening, Stefanie, 2021. "Does sustainability really matter to consumers? Assessing the importance of online shop and apparel product attributes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Lancsar, Emily & Louviere, Jordan & Donaldson, Cam & Currie, Gillian & Burgess, Leonie, 2013. "Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 74-82.
    6. Aizaki, Hideo & Fogarty, James, 2019. "An R package and tutorial for case 2 best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Qingmeng Tong & Lu Zhang & Junbiao Zhang, 2017. "Evaluation of GHG Mitigation Measures in Rice Cropping and Effects of Farmer’s Characteristics: Evidence from Hubei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Marco A. Palma, 2017. "Improving the prediction of ranking data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1681-1710, December.
    9. Lan Anh Nguyen & Manh-Hung Nguyen & Viet-Ngu Hoang & Arnaud Reynaud & Michel Simioni & Clevo Wilson, 2024. "Tourists’ preferences and willingness to pay for protecting a World Heritage site from coastal erosion in Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27607-27628, November.
    10. Muunda, Emmanuel & Mtimet, Nadhem & Schneider, Franziska & Wanyoike, Francis & Dominguez-Salas, Paula & Alonso, Silvia, 2021. "Could the new dairy policy affect milk allocation to infants in Kenya? A best-worst scaling approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Shehely Parvin & Paul Wang & Jashim Uddin, 2016. "Using best-worst scaling method to examine consumers’ value preferences: A multidimensional perspective," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1199110-119, December.
    12. Chakraborty, Rahul & Chakravarty, Sujoy, 2023. "Factors affecting acceptance of electric two-wheelers in India: A discrete choice survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 27-41.
    13. Cooper, Bethany & Crase, Lin & Rose, John M., 2018. "Cost-reflective pricing: empirical insights into irrigators’ preferences for water tariffs," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(2), April.
    14. Shaosheng Jin & Rao Yuan & Yan Zhang & Xin Jin, 2019. "Chinese Consumers’ Preferences for Attributes of Fresh Milk: A Best–Worst Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Osman, Ahmed M.Y. & Wu, Jing & He, Xiaoning & Chen, Gang, 2021. "Eliciting SF-6Dv2 health state utilities using an anchored best-worst scaling technique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Soekhai, V. & Donkers, B. & Levitan, B. & de Bekker-Grob, E.W., 2021. "Case 2 best-worst scaling: For good or for bad but not for both," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    17. West, Grant H. & Snell, Heather & Kovacs, Kent & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2020. "Estimation of the preferences for the intertemporal services from groundwater," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304220, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Tatenda T Yemeke & Elizabeth E Kiracho & Aloysius Mutebi & Rebecca R Apolot & Anthony Ssebagereka & Daniel R Evans & Sachiko Ozawa, 2020. "Health versus other sectors: Multisectoral resource allocation preferences in Mukono district, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Loureiro, Maria L. & Rahmani, Djamel, 2016. "The incidence of calorie labeling on fast food choices: A comparison between stated preferences and actual choices," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 82-93.
    20. T.N. Flynn & A.A.J. Marley, 2014. "Best-worst scaling: theory and methods," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 8, pages 178-201, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:46:y:2023:i:c:s1755534522000513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.