IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v50y2018i04p544-578_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal Welfare Perceptions Of The U.S. Public And Cow-Calf Producers

Author

Listed:
  • McKENDREE, MELISSA G.S.
  • TONSOR, GLYNN T.
  • WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A.

Abstract

The U.S. livestock industry is increasingly faced with pressure to adjust practices in response to societal concerns—specifically related to farm animal welfare. Using best-worst scaling, we determine which practices the U.S. public and cow-calf producers view as the most effective and most practical practices to improve beef cattle welfare. Latent class models are used to understand heterogeneity within and across the public and producers. Fresh, clean feed and water was viewed by most groups as both effective and practical. Furthermore, castrate with pain control and dehorn with pain control were seen as the least effective and practical practices.

Suggested Citation

  • McKENDREE, MELISSA G.S. & TONSOR, GLYNN T. & WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A., 2018. "Animal Welfare Perceptions Of The U.S. Public And Cow-Calf Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 544-578, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:50:y:2018:i:04:p:544-578_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070818000147/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher N. Boyer & Karen L. DeLong & Andrew P. Griffith & Charles C. Martinez, 2024. "Factors influencing United States cattle producers use of livestock risk protection," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 677-689, July.
    2. Aizaki, Hideo & Fogarty, James, 2023. "R packages and tutorial for case 1 best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    3. Vincenzina Caputo & Jayson L. Lusk, 2020. "What agricultural and food policies do U.S. consumers prefer? A best–worst scaling approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 75-93, January.
    4. Kwon, Daye & Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Reardon, Thomas A. & Mason-Wardell, Nicole M. & Tasie, Oyinkansola, 2024. "Addressing Conflict and Weather Shocks in Agrifood Value Chains: Policy Preferences of Nigerian Maize Traders," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343947, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Elliott J. Dennis & Glynn T. Tonsor & Jayson L. Lusk, 2021. "Choosing quantities impacts individuals choice, rationality, and willingness to pay estimates," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 945-962, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:50:y:2018:i:04:p:544-578_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.