IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v498y2024ics0304380024002886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models vetted against prediction error and parameter sensitivity standards can credibly evaluate ecosystem management options

Author

Listed:
  • Haas, Timothy C.

Abstract

A new standard for assessing model credibility is developed. This standard consists of parameter estimation, prediction error assessment, and a parameter sensitivity analysis that is driven by outside individuals who are skeptical of the model’s credibility (hereafter, skeptics). Ecological/environmental models that have a one-step-ahead prediction error rate that is better than naive forecasting — and are not excessively sensitive to small changes in their parameter values are said here to be vetted. A procedure is described that can perform this assessment on any model being evaluated for possible participation in an ecosystem management decision. Uncertainty surrounding the model’s ability to predict future values of its output variables and in the estimates of all of its parameters should be part of any effort to vett a model. The vetting procedure described herein, Prediction Error Rate-Deterministic Sensitivity Analysis (PER-DSA), incorporates these two aspects of model uncertainty. DSA in particular, requires participation by skeptics and is the reason why a successful DSA gives a model sufficient credibility to have a voice in ecosystem management decision making. But these models need to be stochastic and represent the mechanistic processes of the system being modeled. For such models, performing a PER-DSA can be computationally expensive. A cluster computing algorithm to speed-up these computations is described as one way to answer this challenge. This new standard is illustrated through a PER-DSA of a population dynamics model of South African rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum).

Suggested Citation

  • Haas, Timothy C., 2024. "Models vetted against prediction error and parameter sensitivity standards can credibly evaluate ecosystem management options," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:498:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002886
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002886
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diederik Strubbe & Laura Jiménez & A. Márcia Barbosa & Amy J. S. Davis & Luc Lens & Carsten Rahbek, 2023. "Mechanistic models project bird invasions with accuracy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Hansen, Bruce E., 2006. "Interval forecasts and parameter uncertainty," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1-2), pages 377-398.
    3. Schuwirth, Nele & Borgwardt, Florian & Domisch, Sami & Friedrichs, Martin & Kattwinkel, Mira & Kneis, David & Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Langhans, Simone D. & Martínez-López, Javier & Vermeiren, Peter, 2019. "How to make ecological models useful for environmental management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    4. Sam M Ferreira & Judith M Botha & Megan C Emmett, 2012. "Anthropogenic Influences on Conservation Values of White Rhinoceros," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Timothy Haas, 2020. "Developing political-ecological theory: The need for many-task computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brias, Antoine & Munch, Stephan B., 2021. "Ecosystem based multi-species management using Empirical Dynamic Programming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    2. Mehmet Balcilar & Rangan Gupta & Stephen M. Miller, 2015. "The out-of-sample forecasting performance of nonlinear models of regional housing prices in the US," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(22), pages 2259-2277, May.
    3. Carl Lonnbark, 2010. "A corrected Value-at-Risk predictor," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(12), pages 1193-1196.
    4. Lee, Yun Shin & Scholtes, Stefan, 2014. "Empirical prediction intervals revisited," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 217-234.
    5. Mosai, Alseno K. & Tokwana, Bontle C. & Tutu, Hlanganani, 2022. "Computer simulation modelling of the simultaneous adsorption of Cd, Cu and Cr from aqueous solutions by agricultural clay soil: A PHREEQC geochemical modelling code coupled to parameter estimation (PE," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    6. Mergani A. Khairalla & Xu Ning & Nashat T. AL-Jallad & Musaab O. El-Faroug, 2018. "Short-Term Forecasting for Energy Consumption through Stacking Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. van Steenderen, Clarke J.M. & Sutton, Guy F., 2024. "Climate covariate selection influences MaxEnt model predictions and predictive accuracy under current and future climates," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    8. Di Pirro, E. & Sallustio, L. & Capotorti, G. & Marchetti, M. & Lasserre, B., 2021. "A scenario-based approach to tackle trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and land use pressure in Central Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 448(C).
    9. João Henrique Gonçalves Mazzeu & Esther Ruiz & Helena Veiga, 2018. "Uncertainty And Density Forecasts Of Arma Models: Comparison Of Asymptotic, Bayesian, And Bootstrap Procedures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 388-419, April.
    10. Wu, Haoran, 2024. "ecode: An R package to investigate community dynamics in ordinary differential equation systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
    11. Haider, Saira M. & Benscoter, Allison M. & Pearlstine, Leonard & D'Acunto, Laura E. & Romañach, Stephanie S., 2021. "Landscape-scale drivers of endangered Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow (Ammospiza maritima mirabilis) presence using an ensemble modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 461(C).
    12. Dimitris Politis & Dimitrios Thomakos, 2007. "NoVaS Transformations: Flexible Inference for Volatility Forecasting," Working Papers 0005, University of Peloponnese, Department of Economics.
    13. Weron, Rafał, 2014. "Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1030-1081.
    14. Haag, Fridolin & Chennu, Arjun, 2023. "Assessing whether decisions are more sensitive to preference or prediction uncertainty with a value of information approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Sutton, G.F. & Martin, G.D., 2022. "Testing MaxEnt model performance in a novel geographic region using an intentionally introduced insect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    16. Callesen, I. & Magnussen, A., 2021. "TransparC2U–A two-pool, pedology oriented forest soil carbon simulation model aimed at user investigations of multiple uncertainties," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 453(C).
    17. Chollet Ramampiandra, Emma & Scheidegger, Andreas & Wydler, Jonas & Schuwirth, Nele, 2023. "A comparison of machine learning and statistical species distribution models: Quantifying overfitting supports model interpretation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    18. Bobrowski, Maria & Weidinger, Johannes & Schwab, Niels & Schickhoff, Udo, 2021. "Searching for ecology in species distribution models in the Himalayas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 458(C).
    19. Lavaud, Romain & La Peyre, Megan K & Couvillion, Brady & Beseres Pollack, Jennifer & Brown, Vincent & Palmer, Terence A & Keim, Barry, 2024. "Predicting restoration and aquaculture potential of eastern oysters through an eco-physiological mechanistic model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    20. Federico Bassetti & Roberto Casarin & Francesco Ravazzolo, 2019. "Density Forecasting," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS59, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:498:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.