IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v498y2024ics0304380024002709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretability in the modeling spectrum: A conceptual framework and a quantification index

Author

Listed:
  • Aguirre-Zapata, Estefania
  • Alvarez, Hernan
  • Lema-Perez, Laura
  • di Sciascio, Fernando
  • Amicarelli, Adriana N.

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of enhancing interpretability in the construction of mathematical models, which are essential for understanding and optimizing complex systems. The primary motivation lies in the need to establish a common conceptual framework across the modeling spectrum and to improve the interpretability of mathematical models, particularly in the context of first principles based semi-physical models (FPBSM). The importance of physical interpretation in models, especially within biotechnological or ecological processes, is highlighted, starting from the difficulty in establishing clear boundaries when searching for constitutive equations in such models, while maintaining a balance between fit accuracy and model interpretability. To meet this challenge, we propose a novel conceptual framework for addressing interpretability within the mathematical modeling spectrum and introduce a mathematical index for quantifying interpretability in FPBSM. Furthermore, the existing modeling methodology is extended by integrating interpretability as an additional criterion in determining the level of specification at which the search for constitutive equations should be stopped. The utility of the index and the proposed methodology is evaluated using a growth model of the grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana).

Suggested Citation

  • Aguirre-Zapata, Estefania & Alvarez, Hernan & Lema-Perez, Laura & di Sciascio, Fernando & Amicarelli, Adriana N., 2024. "Interpretability in the modeling spectrum: A conceptual framework and a quantification index," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:498:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002709
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vermeiren, Peter & Reichert, Peter & Schuwirth, Nele, 2020. "Integrating uncertain prior knowledge regarding ecological preferences into multi-species distribution models: Effects of model complexity on predictive performance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    2. Aguirre-Zapata, Estefania & Alvarez, Hernan & Dagatti, Carla Vanina & di Sciascio, Fernando & Amicarelli, Adriana N., 2023. "Parametric interpretability of growth kinetics equations in a process model for the life cycle of Lobesia botrana," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    3. Aguirre-Zapata, Estefania & Morales, Humberto & Dagatti, Carla V. & di Sciascio, Fernando & Amicarelli, Adriana N., 2022. "Semi physical growth model of Lobesia botrana under laboratory conditions for Argentina’s Cuyo region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    4. Karplus, Walter J., 1977. "The spectrum of mathematical modeling and systems simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 3-10.
    5. Jiménez, Laura & Soberón, Jorge & Christen, J. Andrés & Soto, Desireé, 2019. "On the problem of modeling a fundamental niche from occurrence data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 74-83.
    6. Andrea Saltelli, 2002. "Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 579-590, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aguirre-Zapata, Estefania & Lema-Perez, Laura & Gomez-Echavarria, Lina & Botero-Castro, Hector & Maya, Juan C. & Chejne, Farid & Alvarez, Hernan, 2024. "Useful properties of phenomenological-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 496(C).
    2. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    3. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    4. Marco Percoco, 2006. "A Note on the Inoperability Input‐Output Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 589-594, June.
    5. Wenbin Ruan & Zhenzhou Lu & Longfei Tian, 2013. "A modified variance-based importance measure and its solution by state dependent parameter," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(1), pages 3-15, February.
    6. Kunz, Nathan & Chesney, Thomas & Trautrims, Alexander & Gold, Stefan, 2023. "Adoption and transferability of joint interventions to fight modern slavery in food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.
    8. Gonnet, Gaston H. & Stewart, John & Lafleur, Joseph & Keith, Stephen & McLellan, Mark & Jiang-Gorsline, David & Snider, Tim, 2021. "Analysis of feature influence on Covid-19 Death Rate Per Country Using a Novel Orthogonalization Technique," MetaArXiv 4kw2n, Center for Open Science.
    9. Abdur Rahim Hamidi & Jiangwei Wang & Shiyao Guo & Zhongping Zeng, 2020. "Flood vulnerability assessment using MOVE framework: a case study of the northern part of district Peshawar, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(2), pages 385-408, March.
    10. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Wenbin Ruan & Zhenzhou Lu & Pengfei Wei, 2013. "Estimation of conditional moment by moving least squares and its application for importance analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(6), pages 641-650, December.
    12. Chen, Yaqian & Nakao, Hiroya & Kang, Yanmei, 2024. "Emergence of pathological beta oscillation and its uncertainty quantification in a time-delayed feedback Parkinsonian model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    14. Li, Haihe & Wang, Pan & Huang, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Zheng & Zhou, Changcong & Yue, Zhufeng, 2021. "Vine copula-based parametric sensitivity analysis of failure probability-based importance measure in the presence of multidimensional dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2006. "Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1349-1361, October.
    16. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. C. L. Smith & E. Borgonovo, 2007. "Decision Making During Nuclear Power Plant Incidents—A New Approach to the Evaluation of Precursor Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1027-1042, August.
    18. Paleari, Livia & Movedi, Ermes & Zoli, Michele & Burato, Andrea & Cecconi, Irene & Errahouly, Jabir & Pecollo, Eleonora & Sorvillo, Carla & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    19. Andrea Saltelli & Arnald Puy, 2023. "What can mathematical modelling contribute to a sociology of quantification?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    20. Viet Duong Nguyen & Chiara Gigliarano, 2024. "Weight optimization for composite indicators based on variable importance: an application to measuring well-being in European Regions," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 78(1), pages 113-128, January-M.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:498:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024002709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.