IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v420y2020ics0304380020300284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating uncertain prior knowledge regarding ecological preferences into multi-species distribution models: Effects of model complexity on predictive performance

Author

Listed:
  • Vermeiren, Peter
  • Reichert, Peter
  • Schuwirth, Nele

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are often criticised for lacking explicit linkage to ecological concepts. We aim to improve the ecological basis of SDMs by integrating prior knowledge about ecological preferences of organisms. Additionally, we aim to support a systematic, data-driven review of such prior knowledge by confronting it with independent monitoring data using Bayesian inference. We developed a series of multi-species distribution models (MSDMs) with increasing complexity to predict the probability of occurrence of taxa at sampling sites based on habitat suitability functions that are parameterized with prior ecological knowledge. We subsequently assessed the models` predictive performance with 3-fold cross-validation. So far, if ecological preferences or functional traits have been used in SDMs, they were mainly used as fixed inputs without considering their uncertainty. We take the additional step of considering uncertainty about preference parameters by including them as uncertain prior information that is subsequently updated with Bayesian inference. We apply the series of models in a case study on macroinvertebrates in Swiss streams. We analyse differences in the quality of fit, changes in predictive performance, and the potential to learn about the parameters from the data. We consider ecological preferences for natural and human modified environmental factors including temperature, flow velocity, organic matter concentration, insecticide pollution, and substratum. Results indicate that updating prior knowledge on ecological preferences with Bayesian inference, rather than using it as fixed input, improves model fit and predictive performance. For example, the predictive performance measured by the deviance for validation data improves by 17 % and the explanatory power increases 3.8 times from a model that treats ecological preferences as fixed scores to a model that treats them as uncertain parameters. The spatial distribution of many taxa, including rare taxa with frequencies of occurrence down to about 5 %, which are difficult to model with SDMs that do not consider prior information, can be captured by the new models. Integrating prior knowledge as uncertain parameters in a Bayesian framework establishes ecological interpretable links between taxa and their environment and supports a systematic revision and complementation of databases on ecological preferences, even in case of poor or missing prior knowledge. Model outputs need to be carefully interpreted by modellers and experts on ecological preferences. Increased exchange between these research fields will benefit further integration of ecological preferences into SDMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Vermeiren, Peter & Reichert, Peter & Schuwirth, Nele, 2020. "Integrating uncertain prior knowledge regarding ecological preferences into multi-species distribution models: Effects of model complexity on predictive performance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:420:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020300284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020300284
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bennetsen, Elina & Gobeyn, Sacha & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2016. "Species distribution models grounded in ecological theory for decision support in river management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caradima, Bogdan & Scheidegger, Andreas & Brodersen, Jakob & Schuwirth, Nele, 2021. "Bridging mechanistic conceptual models and statistical species distribution models of riverine fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    2. Chollet Ramampiandra, Emma & Scheidegger, Andreas & Wydler, Jonas & Schuwirth, Nele, 2023. "A comparison of machine learning and statistical species distribution models: Quantifying overfitting supports model interpretation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Dong & Chen, Lin & Sun, Huaiwei & Liao, Weihong & Chen, Haorui & Wei, Guanghui & Zhang, Wenxin & Tuo, Ye, 2022. "Allocation of ecological water rights considering ecological networks in arid watersheds: A framework and case study of Tarim River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Shin-Ruoh Juang & Szu-Hung Chen & Chen-Fa Wu, 2017. "An Expert-Based Assessment Model for Evaluating Habitat Suitability of Pond-Breeding Amphibians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Gobeyn, Sacha & Mouton, Ans M. & Cord, Anna F. & Kaim, Andrea & Volk, Martin & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2019. "Evolutionary algorithms for species distribution modelling: A review in the context of machine learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 179-195.
    4. Li, Mengyi & Deng, Mingjiang & Ling, Hongbo & Xu, Jia, 2024. "Development of a new rotational irrigation model in an arid basin based on ecological zoning and sluice regulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:420:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020300284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.