IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v467y2022ics0304380022000473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sampling theory inspires quantitative forest ecology: The story of the relascope kernel function

Author

Listed:
  • Pommerening, Arne
  • Sterba, Hubert
  • West, Philip

Abstract

Understanding and modelling plant interactions is an important field in quantitative forest ecology. Many spatially explicit techniques have been devised for shedding light into these processes. One of these methods includes the application of kernel functions, which describe the decay with increasing distance of interaction effects of each plant of a given community on others. In forest inventory, a method referred to as relascope sampling is often applied to collect information on the state and change of tree resources: somewhat unexpectedly, the mathematical principles of this technique have been turned into measures of competition for use in ecological modelling. In this study, we combined methods from quantitative ecology and sampling theory by defining a parameter-parsimonious relascope kernel function, thus generalising the concept of individual-tree basal-area factors. By using both relative and absolute growth rates as response variables in the regression we compared the performance of the relascope kernel with an alternative, the exponential kernel function. Our results indicated that the relascope kernel can indeed be applied to both types of growth rates in individual-based models. Using individual-tree basal-area factors, it is even possible to anticipate the performance of the relascope kernel. In most cases the estimation efficiency was greater, when absolute growth rate was the response variable. The exponential kernel was more efficient than the relascope kernel, but at the expense of parameter parsimony and estimation robustness. Our study has shown that simple, parsimonious models, inspired by another field of natural sciences, such as the relascope kernel, can effectively encapsulate the interaction dynamics of forest ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Pommerening, Arne & Sterba, Hubert & West, Philip, 2022. "Sampling theory inspires quantitative forest ecology: The story of the relascope kernel function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:467:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000473
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022000473
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pommerening, Arne & LeMay, Valerie & Stoyan, Dietrich, 2011. "Model-based analysis of the influence of ecological processes on forest point pattern formation—A case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 666-678.
    2. Rasmussen, Camilla Ruø & Weiner, Jacob, 2017. "Modelling the effect of size-asymmetric competition on size inequality: Simple models with two plants," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 101-108.
    3. Häbel, Henrike & Myllymäki, Mari & Pommerening, Arne, 2019. "New insights on the behaviour of alternative types of individual-based tree models for natural forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 23-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cordonnier, Thomas & Smadi, Charline & Kunstler, Georges & Courbaud, Benoît, 2019. "Asymmetric competition, ontogenetic growth and size inequality drive the difference in productivity between two-strata and one-stratum forest stands," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 83-93.
    2. Pommerening, Arne & Szmyt, Janusz & Zhang, Gongqiao, 2020. "A new nearest-neighbour index for monitoring spatial size diversity: The hyperbolic tangent index," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    3. Myllymäki, Mari & Kuronen, Mikko & Bianchi, Simone & Pommerening, Arne & Mehtätalo, Lauri, 2024. "A Bayesian approach to projecting forest dynamics and related uncertainty: An application to continuous cover forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
    4. Frédéric Lavancier & Ronan Le Guével, 2021. "Spatial birth–death–move processes: Basic properties and estimation of their intensity functions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(4), pages 798-825, September.
    5. Pommerening, Arne & Särkkä, Aila, 2013. "What mark variograms tell about spatial plant interactions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 64-72.
    6. Häbel, Henrike & Myllymäki, Mari & Pommerening, Arne, 2019. "New insights on the behaviour of alternative types of individual-based tree models for natural forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 23-32.
    7. Zhu, Sai-Yong & Cheng, Zheng-Guo & Tian, Tao & Gong, Dong-Shan & Lv, Guang-Chao & Wang, Jing & Xiong, You-Cai, 2021. "Screening optimum population density in response to soil water availability in dryland wheat: From laboratory to field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    8. Peters, Ronny & Lin, Yue & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Machine learning meets individual-based modelling: Self-organising feature maps for the analysis of below-ground competition among plants," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 142-151.
    9. A. Gyawali & R. P. Sharma & S.K. Bhandari, 2015. "Individual tree basal area growth models for Chir pine (Pinus roxberghii Sarg.) in western Nepal," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(12), pages 535-543.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:467:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.