IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v326y2016icp142-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning meets individual-based modelling: Self-organising feature maps for the analysis of below-ground competition among plants

Author

Listed:
  • Peters, Ronny
  • Lin, Yue
  • Berger, Uta

Abstract

Individual-based models (IBM) simulate populations and communities whose dynamics are shaped by the properties, interactions and behaviour of the constituent organisms as well as the corresponding abiotic boundary conditions. Structurally realistic IBM can provide insights into the functioning of such systems and predict the effects of variable scenarios. We suggest complementing IBM with machine learning (ML) methods in order (i) to visualise correlation patterns between model inputs and model outputs, (ii) to provide simulation-based decision tools for non-modellers, and (iii) to derive information about factors difficult to obtain in the field on the basis of data that are more readily measurable. On top of this, ML methods can complement the established pattern-oriented modelling approach used to analyse the behaviour of IBM and to detect model uncertainties. As an example to demonstrate the strength of an IBM-ML connection, we combined the individual-based Plant Interaction Model (Pi model) with self-organising feature maps (SOM) – a special type of ML. Based on simulation experiments with complete knowledge of the simulated system, the SOM was trained and used to visualise the nonlinear relationship between two IBM inputs (namely the mode of below-ground competition and below-ground resource limitation) and two model outputs (the mortality rate and the Clark Evans Index of the spatial distribution of plants). Our study also highlights an application of the SOM to infer the modes of below-ground competition (either symmetric or asymmetric) from the remaining measurable variables (resource limitation, mortality rate and Clark Evans Index). This procedure was successful in 92% of cases, revealing its great potential as a means to assess parameters difficult to measure in nature. This example shows that SOM are powerful tools to revert the hierarchy of variables and to generalise dependencies of parameters in individual based modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Peters, Ronny & Lin, Yue & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Machine learning meets individual-based modelling: Self-organising feature maps for the analysis of below-ground competition among plants," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 142-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:326:y:2016:i:c:p:142-151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015004925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pommerening, Arne & LeMay, Valerie & Stoyan, Dietrich, 2011. "Model-based analysis of the influence of ecological processes on forest point pattern formation—A case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 666-678.
    2. Richard G. Pearson & Jessica C. Stanton & Kevin T. Shoemaker & Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens & Peter J. Ersts & Ned Horning & Damien A. Fordham & Christopher J. Raxworthy & Hae Yeong Ryu & Jason McNees & , 2014. "Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 217-221, March.
    3. Geoffrey B. West & James H. Brown & Brian J. Enquist, 2001. "A general model for ontogenetic growth," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6856), pages 628-631, October.
    4. Jakoby, Oliver & Grimm, Volker & Frank, Karin, 2014. "Pattern-oriented parameterization of general models for ecological application: Towards realistic evaluations of management approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 78-88.
    5. Watts, Michael J. & Li, Yuxiao & Russell, Bayden D. & Mellin, Camille & Connell, Sean D. & Fordham, Damien A., 2011. "A novel method for mapping reefs and subtidal rocky habitats using artificial neural networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2606-2614.
    6. Piou, Cyril & Berger, Uta & Grimm, Volker, 2009. "Proposing an information criterion for individual-based models developed in a pattern-oriented modelling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(17), pages 1957-1967.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Ping & Han, Xiao-Hui & Lin, Yue & Moore, John & Guo, Yao-Xin & Yue, Ming, 2019. "Exploring the relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors that alter the self-thinning rule: Insights from individual-based modelling and machine-learning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 16-24.
    2. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Barberis, L. & Condat, C.A., 2012. "Describing interactive growth using vector universalities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 56-63.
    3. Sigourney, Douglas B. & Munch, Stephan B. & Letcher, Benjamin H., 2012. "Combining a Bayesian nonparametric method with a hierarchical framework to estimate individual and temporal variation in growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 125-134.
    4. Carl-Johan Dalgaard & Holger Strulik, 2014. "Physiological Constraints and Comparative Economic Development," Discussion Papers 14-21, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    5. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Robustness analysis: Deconstructing computational models for ecological theory and applications," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 162-167.
    6. Graciá, Eva & Rodríguez-Caro, Roberto C. & Sanz-Aguilar, Ana & Anadón, José D. & Botella, Francisco & García-García, Angel Luis & Wiegand, Thorsten & Giménez, Andrés, 2020. "Assessment of the key evolutionary traits that prevent extinctions in human-altered habitats using a spatially explicit individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    7. Carl-Johan Dalgaard & Holger Strulik, 2015. "The physiological foundations of the wealth of nations," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-73, March.
    8. Ribeiro, Fabiano L. & Ribeiro, Kayo N., 2015. "A one dimensional model of population growth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 434(C), pages 201-210.
    9. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta, 2016. "Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 177-187.
    10. Nathalie Butt & Rachael Gallagher, 2018. "Using species traits to guide conservation actions under climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 317-332, November.
    11. Singer, Alexander & Schweiger, Oliver & Kühn, Ingolf & Johst, Karin, 2018. "Constructing a hybrid species distribution model from standard large-scale distribution data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 373(C), pages 39-52.
    12. Giacomini, Henrique C. & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Trexler, Joel C. & Petrere, Miguel, 2013. "Trait contributions to fish community assembly emerge from trophic interactions in an individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 32-43.
    13. Carey W. King, 2021. "Interdependence of Growth, Structure, Size and Resource Consumption During an Economic Growth Cycle," Papers 2106.02512, arXiv.org.
    14. Pilowsky, Julia A. & Manica, Andrea & Brown, Stuart & Rahbek, Carsten & Fordham, Damien A., 2022. "Simulations of human migration into North America are more sensitive to demography than choice of palaeoclimate model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    15. Santiago Campos-Barreiro & Jesús López-Fidalgo, 2015. "D-optimal experimental designs for a growth model applied to a Holstein-Friesian dairy farm," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 24(3), pages 491-505, September.
    16. Ochoa-Ochoa, Leticia M. & Flores-Villela, Oscar A. & Bezaury-Creel, Juan E., 2016. "Using one vs. many, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of species distribution models with focus on conservation area networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 372-382.
    17. Sébastien Benzekry & Clare Lamont & Afshin Beheshti & Amanda Tracz & John M L Ebos & Lynn Hlatky & Philip Hahnfeldt, 2014. "Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Tao, Yong & Lin, Li & Wang, Hanjie & Hou, Chen, 2023. "Superlinear growth and the fossil fuel energy sustainability dilemma: Evidence from six continents," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 39-51.
    19. Hendriks, A. Jan, 2007. "The power of size: A meta-analysis reveals consistency of allometric regressions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 196-208.
    20. Annette Baudisch, 2009. "How ageing is shaped by trade-offs," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-043, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:326:y:2016:i:c:p:142-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.