IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v83y2021i4p798-825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial birth–death–move processes: Basic properties and estimation of their intensity functions

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Lavancier
  • Ronan Le Guével

Abstract

Many spatiotemporal data record the time of birth and death of individuals, along with their spatial trajectories during their lifetime, whether through continuous‐time observations or discrete‐time observations. Natural applications include epidemiology, individual‐based modelling in ecology, spatiotemporal dynamics observed in bioimaging and computer vision. The aim of this article is to estimate in this context the birth and death intensity functions that depend in full generality on the current spatial configuration of all alive individuals. While the temporal evolution of the population size is a simple birth–death process, observing the lifetime and trajectories of all individuals calls for a new paradigm. To formalise this framework, we introduce spatial birth–death–move processes, where the birth and death dynamics depends on the current spatial configuration of the population and where individuals can move during their lifetime according to a continuous Markov process with possible interactions. We consider non‐parametric kernel estimators of their birth and death intensity functions. The setting is original because each observation in time belongs to a non‐vectorial, infinite dimensional space and the dependence between observations is barely tractable. We prove the consistency of the estimators in the presence of continuous‐time and discrete‐time observations, under fairly simple conditions. We moreover discuss how we can take advantage in practice of structural assumptions made on the intensity functions and we explain how data‐driven bandwidth selection can be conducted, despite the unknown (and sometimes undefined) second order moments of the estimators. We finally apply our statistical method to the analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins involved in exocytosis in cells, providing new insights on this complex mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Lavancier & Ronan Le Guével, 2021. "Spatial birth–death–move processes: Basic properties and estimation of their intensity functions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(4), pages 798-825, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:83:y:2021:i:4:p:798-825
    DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssb.12452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renshaw, Eric & Sarkka, Aila, 2001. "Gibbs point processes for studying the development of spatial-temporal stochastic processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 85-105, March.
    2. Sarkka, Aila & Renshaw, Eric, 2006. "The analysis of marked point patterns evolving through space and time," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1698-1718, December.
    3. Romain Azaïs & François Dufour & Anne Gégout-Petit, 2014. "Non-Parametric Estimation of the Conditional Distribution of the Interjumping Times for Piecewise-Deterministic Markov Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 950-969, December.
    4. Ronald W. Wolff, 1965. "Problems of Statistical Inference for Birth and Death Queuing Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 343-357, June.
    5. Frédéric Lavancier & Thierry Pécot & Liu Zengzhen & Charles Kervrann, 2020. "Testing independence between two random sets for the analysis of colocalization in bioimaging," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 36-46, March.
    6. Häbel, Henrike & Myllymäki, Mari & Pommerening, Arne, 2019. "New insights on the behaviour of alternative types of individual-based tree models for natural forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 23-32.
    7. Peter Diggle, 1985. "A Kernel Method for Smoothing Point Process Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 34(2), pages 138-147, June.
    8. Guan, Yongtao, 2008. "On Consistent Nonparametric Intensity Estimation for Inhomogeneous Spatial Point Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 1238-1247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeriy Naumov, 2024. "A Matrix-Multiplicative Solution for Multi-Dimensional QBD Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Redenbach, Claudia & Särkkä, Aila, 2013. "Parameter estimation for growth interaction processes using spatio-temporal information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 672-683.
    2. Ondřej Šedivý & Antti Penttinen, 2014. "Intensity estimation for inhomogeneous Gibbs point process with covariates-dependent chemical activity," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(3), pages 225-249, August.
    3. Pommerening, Arne & LeMay, Valerie & Stoyan, Dietrich, 2011. "Model-based analysis of the influence of ecological processes on forest point pattern formation—A case study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 666-678.
    4. Mohammad Ghorbani & Ottmar Cronie & Jorge Mateu & Jun Yu, 2021. "Functional marked point processes: a natural structure to unify spatio-temporal frameworks and to analyse dependent functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 529-568, September.
    5. Häbel, Henrike & Myllymäki, Mari & Pommerening, Arne, 2019. "New insights on the behaviour of alternative types of individual-based tree models for natural forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 23-32.
    6. Comas, C. & Mateu, J., 2008. "Space-time dependence dynamics for birth-death point processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2715-2719, November.
    7. Isabel Fuentes-Santos & Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Jorge Mateu, 2016. "Consistent Smooth Bootstrap Kernel Intensity Estimation for Inhomogeneous Spatial Poisson Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 416-435, June.
    8. Yu Ryan Yue & Ji Meng Loh, 2011. "Bayesian Semiparametric Intensity Estimation for Inhomogeneous Spatial Point Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 937-946, September.
    9. Borrajo, M.I. & González-Manteiga, W. & Martínez-Miranda, M.D., 2024. "Goodness-of-fit test for point processes first-order intensity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Renshaw, Eric & Mateu, Jorge & Saura, Fuensanta, 2007. "Disentangling mark/point interaction in marked-point processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 3123-3144, March.
    11. Cronie, Ottmar & Särkkä, Aila, 2011. "Some edge correction methods for marked spatio-temporal point process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2209-2220, July.
    12. Borrajo, M.I. & González-Manteiga, W. & Martínez-Miranda, M.D., 2020. "Bootstrapping kernel intensity estimation for inhomogeneous point processes with spatial covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Giuseppe Espa & Giuseppe Arbia & Diego Giuliani, 2013. "Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-50, January.
    14. M. N. M. Lieshout, 2020. "Infill Asymptotics and Bandwidth Selection for Kernel Estimators of Spatial Intensity Functions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 995-1008, September.
    15. Hoffmann, Marc & Marguet, Aline, 2019. "Statistical estimation in a randomly structured branching population," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(12), pages 5236-5277.
    16. Pommerening, Arne & Sterba, Hubert & West, Philip, 2022. "Sampling theory inspires quantitative forest ecology: The story of the relascope kernel function," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    17. Mola-Yudego, Blas & Selkimäki, Mari & González-Olabarria, José Ramón, 2014. "Spatial analysis of the wood pellet production for energy in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 76-83.
    18. Yingqi Zhao & Donglin Zeng & Amy H. Herring & Amy Ising & Anna Waller & David Richardson & Michael R. Kosorok, 2011. "Detecting Disease Outbreaks Using Local Spatiotemporal Methods," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1508-1517, December.
    19. François Sémécurbe & Cécile Tannier & Stéphane G. Roux, 2019. "Applying two fractal methods to characterise the local and global deviations from scale invariance of built patterns throughout mainland France," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 271-293, June.
    20. Peng Hou & Xiaojian Yi & Haiping Dong, 2020. "A Spatial Statistic Based Risk Assessment Approach to Prioritize the Pipeline Inspection of the Pipeline Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:83:y:2021:i:4:p:798-825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.