IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v391y2019icp16-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simulation study on how the resource competition and anti-predator cooperation impact the motile-phytoplankton groups’ formation under predation stress

Author

Listed:
  • Bouderbala, Ilhem
  • El Saadi, Nadjia
  • Bah, Alassane
  • Auger, Pierre

Abstract

The phytoplankton's spatial aggregation is a very important phenomenon that can give responses to many questions such as the passage from the unicellularity to the multicellularity. In this work, we are interested by predator-induced aggregations in motile phytoplankton. Our aim is to bring, through a simulation study, some explanations on how these groups form and analyze the simultaneous effect of both resource competition and anti-predation cooperation on the groups’ formation process. For this purpose, we developed a 3D individual-based model (IBM) that takes into account small-scale biological processes for the phytoplankton cells that are: (1) motion, described by a stochastic differential equation in which the drift term is density-dependent to take into account the attraction mechanism between cells due to their chemosensory abilities and the dispersal term representing the diffusion of cells in water, (2) a density-dependent birth–death process to describe the demographical process in phytoplankton cells. In the latter, division and death rates were considered density-dependent to include a local competition for resources that slows up the cell's division and a local cooperation in phytoplankton that reduces the cell's predation death. We implemented the IBM and considered several scenarios that combine three different levels of resource competition with three different intensities of cooperation. The different scenarios were tested using real parameter values for phytoplankton.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouderbala, Ilhem & El Saadi, Nadjia & Bah, Alassane & Auger, Pierre, 2019. "A simulation study on how the resource competition and anti-predator cooperation impact the motile-phytoplankton groups’ formation under predation stress," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 391(C), pages 16-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:391:y:2019:i:c:p:16-28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380018303429
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William C. Ratcliff & Matthew D. Herron & Kathryn Howell & Jennifer T. Pentz & Frank Rosenzweig & Michael Travisano, 2013. "Experimental evolution of an alternating uni- and multicellular life cycle in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. El Saadi, N. & Bah, A., 2007. "An individual-based model for studying the aggregation behavior in phytoplankton," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 193-212.
    3. William W Driscoll & Michael Travisano, 2017. "Synergistic cooperation promotes multicellular performance and unicellular free-rider persistence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Jef Huisman & Nga N. Pham Thi & David M. Karl & Ben Sommeijer, 2006. "Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum," Nature, Nature, vol. 439(7074), pages 322-325, January.
    5. Fritsch, Coralie & Harmand, Jérôme & Campillo, Fabien, 2015. "A modeling approach of the chemostat," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 299(C), pages 1-13.
    6. William M. Durham & Eric Climent & Michael Barry & Filippo De Lillo & Guido Boffetta & Massimo Cencini & Roman Stocker, 2013. "Turbulence drives microscale patches of motile phytoplankton," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, October.
    7. Grimm, Volker & Berger, Uta & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Polhill, J. Gary & Giske, Jarl & Railsback, Steven F., 2010. "The ODD protocol: A review and first update," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(23), pages 2760-2768.
    8. Hellweger, Ferdi L. & Bucci, Vanni, 2009. "A bunch of tiny individuals—Individual-based modeling for microbes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 8-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bordj, Naziha & Saadi, Nadjia El, 2022. "Moment approximation of individual-based models. Application to the study of the spatial dynamics of phytoplankton populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yashraj Chavhan & Sutirth Dey & Peter A. Lind, 2023. "Bacteria evolve macroscopic multicellularity by the genetic assimilation of phenotypically plastic cell clustering," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Huang, Tousheng & Yu, Chengfeng & Zhang, Kui & Liu, Xingyu & Zhen, Jiulong & Wang, Lan, 2023. "Complex pattern dynamics and synchronization in a coupled spatiotemporal plankton system with zooplankton vertical migration," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P2).
    3. Tardy, Olivia & Lenglos, Christophe & Lai, Sandra & Berteaux, Dominique & Leighton, Patrick A., 2023. "Rabies transmission in the Arctic: An agent-based model reveals the effects of broad-scale movement strategies on contact risk between Arctic foxes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    4. Vimercati, Giovanni & Hui, Cang & Davies, Sarah J. & Measey, G. John, 2017. "Integrating age structured and landscape resistance models to disentangle invasion dynamics of a pond-breeding anuran," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 104-116.
    5. Shen, Anglu & Gao, Shufei & Heggerud, Christopher M. & Wang, Hao & Ma, Zengling & Yuan, Sanling, 2023. "Fluctuation of growth and photosynthetic characteristics in Prorocentrum shikokuense under phosphorus limitation: Evidence from field and laboratory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    6. Jagadish, Arundhati & Dwivedi, Puneet & McEntire, Kira D. & Chandar, Mamta, 2019. "Agent-based modeling of “cleaner” cookstove adoption and woodfuel use: An integrative empirical approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Hinker, Jonas & Hemkendreis, Christian & Drewing, Emily & März, Steven & Hidalgo Rodríguez, Diego I. & Myrzik, Johanna M.A., 2017. "A novel conceptual model facilitating the derivation of agent-based models for analyzing socio-technical optimality gaps in the energy domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1219-1230.
    8. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Jens Lausen & Moritz Kohlhase, 2021. "Internalizing the externalities of overfunding: an agent-based model approach for analyzing the market dynamics on crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1387-1430, November.
    10. Crevier, Lucas Phillip & Salkeld, Joseph H & Marley, Jessa & Parrott, Lael, 2021. "Making the best possible choice: Using agent-based modelling to inform wildlife management in small communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 446(C).
    11. Ulfia A. Lenfers & Julius Weyl & Thomas Clemen, 2018. "Firewood Collection in South Africa: Adaptive Behavior in Social-Ecological Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    12. David, Viviane & Joachim, Sandrine & Tebby, Cleo & Porcher, Jean-Marc & Beaudouin, Rémy, 2019. "Modelling population dynamics in mesocosms using an individual-based model coupled to a bioenergetics model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 55-66.
    13. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    14. Moritz Kersting & Andreas Bossert & Leif Sörensen & Benjamin Wacker & Jan Chr. Schlüter, 2021. "Predicting effectiveness of countermeasures during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Africa using agent-based simulation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Meli, Mattia & Auclerc, Apolline & Palmqvist, Annemette & Forbes, Valery E. & Grimm, Volker, 2013. "Population-level consequences of spatially heterogeneous exposure to heavy metals in soil: An individual-based model of springtails," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 338-351.
    16. Groeneveld, Jürgen & Johst, Karin & Kawaguchi, So & Meyer, Bettina & Teschke, Mathias & Grimm, Volker, 2015. "How biological clocks and changing environmental conditions determine local population growth and species distribution in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): a conceptual model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 78-86.
    17. Henzler, Julia & Weise, Hanna & Enright, Neal J. & Zander, Susanne & Tietjen, Britta, 2018. "A squeeze in the suitable fire interval: Simulating the persistence of fire-killed plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem under drier conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 389(C), pages 41-49.
    18. Kanapaux, William & Kiker, Gregory A., 2013. "Development and testing of an object-oriented model for adaptively managing human disturbance of least tern (Sternula antillarum) nesting habitat," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 64-77.
    19. Fenintsoa Andriamasinoro & Raphael Danino-Perraud, 2021. "Use of artificial intelligence to assess mineral substance criticality in the French market: the example of cobalt," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(1), pages 19-37, April.
    20. Claudia Dislich & Elisabeth Hettig & Jan Salecker & Johannes Heinonen & Jann Lay & Katrin M Meyer & Kerstin Wiegand & Suria Tarigan, 2018. "Land-use change in oil palm dominated tropical landscapes—An agent-based model to explore ecological and socio-economic trade-offs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:391:y:2019:i:c:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.