IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v309-310y2015ip64-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of predictive habitat models performance of plant species in Hoze soltan rangelands of Qom province

Author

Listed:
  • Sahragard, H.P.
  • Chahouki, M.A. Zare

Abstract

The current study addresses an assessment of performance of modeling techniques including logistic regression (LR), maximum entropy modeling technique (MaxEnt) and artificial neural network (ANN) to predict habitat distribution of plant species in Qom Province rangelands of Iran. After determination of homogeneous units, vegetation sampling was carried out using random systematic method. Depending on the plant species, the plot size was determined using Minimal Area method from 2 to 25m2. Sample size was also determined to be 60 plots with respect to vegetation cover variations using statistical method. In order to sample the soil at each habitat, eight holes was drilled and samples were taken from 0 to 30 and 30 to 80cm depths. Plant distribution modeling was conducted using LR, the MaxEnt and ANN. After implementation of the model, to evaluate and predict the actual maps conformity, Kappa coefficient and true skill statistic (TSS) were measured. On the basis of Kappa and TSS values calculated, prediction accuracy of the methods used varies for different habitats. Results indicate that LR model is capable to predict habitats distribution of Halocnemum strobilaceum, which has limited ecological niche at very good level (κ=0.71). The model obtained from the MaxEnt could predict habitat distribution of Artemisia sieberi at very good level. However, the prediction maps derived from ANN models for all studied habitats were obtained to be at good and very good level. Results indicate a strong relationship between model performance and the kinds of species distributions being modeled. Some methods performed generally better, but no method was superior in all circumstances. Based on these results it can be said that in order to choose the optimal approach of habitats distribution modeling in addition to the statistical considerations, purpose and expected accuracy, data available types, ecological niche range of species and be interpreted of method in terms of ecological concepts also should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahragard, H.P. & Chahouki, M.A. Zare, 2015. "An evaluation of predictive habitat models performance of plant species in Hoze soltan rangelands of Qom province," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 64-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:309-310:y:2015:i::p:64-71
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015001350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    2. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    3. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    4. Marmion, Mathieu & Luoto, Miska & Heikkinen, Risto K. & Thuiller, Wilfried, 2009. "The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3512-3520.
    5. Kaiping Wang & Weiqi Wang & Niyi Zha & Yue Feng & Chenlan Qiu & Yunlu Zhang & Jia Ma & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Spatially Heterogeneity Response of Critical Ecosystem Service Capacity to Address Regional Development Risks to Rapid Urbanization: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.
    7. Rufino, Marta M. & Albouy, Camille & Brind'Amour, Anik, 2021. "Which spatial interpolators I should use? A case study applying to marine species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    8. Stoklosa, Jakub & Huang, Yih-Huei & Furlan, Elise & Hwang, Wen-Han, 2016. "On quadratic logistic regression models when predictor variables are subject to measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 109-121.
    9. Moreno-Amat, Elena & Mateo, Rubén G. & Nieto-Lugilde, Diego & Morueta-Holme, Naia & Svenning, Jens-Christian & García-Amorena, Ignacio, 2015. "Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 308-317.
    10. Halvorsen, Rune & Mazzoni, Sabrina & Dirksen, John Wirkola & Næsset, Erik & Gobakken, Terje & Ohlson, Mikael, 2016. "How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 108-118.
    11. Zhou, Demin & Gong, Huili & Liu, Zhaoli, 2008. "Integrated ecological assessment of biophysical wetland habitat in water catchments: Linking hydro-ecological modelling with geo-information techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 411-420.
    12. Flores, O. & Rossi, V. & Mortier, F., 2009. "Autocorrelation offsets zero-inflation in models of tropical saplings density," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1797-1809.
    13. Pliscoff, Patricio & Luebert, Federico & Hilger, Hartmut H. & Guisan, Antoine, 2014. "Effects of alternative sets of climatic predictors on species distribution models and associated estimates of extinction risk: A test with plants in an arid environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 166-177.
    14. Yvonne Milker & Manuel F G Weinkauf & Jürgen Titschack & Andre Freiwald & Stefan Krüger & Frans J Jorissen & Gerhard Schmiedl, 2017. "Testing the applicability of a benthic foraminiferal-based transfer function for the reconstruction of paleowater depth changes in Rhodes (Greece) during the early Pleistocene," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, November.
    15. Francesca Raffini & Giorgio Bertorelle & Roberto Biello & Guido D’Urso & Danilo Russo & Luciano Bosso, 2020. "From Nucleotides to Satellite Imagery: Approaches to Identify and Manage the Invasive Pathogen Xylella fastidiosa and Its Insect Vectors in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-38, June.
    16. Ballet, Jérôme & Bazin, Damien Jérôme Albert & Komena, Boniface K., 2020. "Unequal capabilities and natural resource management: The case of Côte d’Ivoire," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Habeebullah Jayeola Oladipo & Yusuf Amuda Tajudeen & Iyiola Olatunji Oladunjoye & Sheriff Taye Mustapha & Yusuff Inaolaji Sodiq & Rashidat Onyinoyi Yusuf & Oluwaseyi Muyiwa Egbewande & Abdulbasit Opey, 2023. "Adopting a Statistical, Mechanistic, Integrated Surveillance, Thermal Biology, and Holistic (SMITH) Approach for Arbovirus Control in a Changing Climate: A Review of Evidence," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    18. Kua Rittiboon & Phattrawan Tongkumchum, 2017. "Using linear regression to measure bird abundance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1003-1013, June.
    19. Xuhui Zhang & Haiyan Wei & Zefang Zhao & Jing Liu & Quanzhong Zhang & Xiaoyan Zhang & Wei Gu, 2020. "The Global Potential Distribution of Invasive Plants: Anredera cordifolia under Climate Change and Human Activity Based on Random Forest Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez & Luísa G Carvalheiro & Chiara Polce & E Emiel van Loon & Niels Raes & Menno Reemer & Jacobus C Biesmeijer, 2013. "Fit-for-Purpose: Species Distribution Model Performance Depends on Evaluation Criteria – Dutch Hoverflies as a Case Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:309-310:y:2015:i::p:64-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.