IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v247y2012icp27-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking below the ground: Prediction of Tuber indicum habitat using the Weights of Evidence method

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xue-Qing
  • Kodikara, Gayantha R.L.
  • Luedeling, Eike
  • Yang, Xue-Fei
  • He, Jun
  • Liu, Pei-gui
  • Xu, Jian-Chu

Abstract

The under-ground mushroom Tuber indicum is renowned for its economic, nutritional, ethnobotanical and ecological importance. For the development of sustainable harvest and conservation practices, better knowledge about the mushroom's habitat is indispensable. However, few approaches allow monitoring T. indicum's distribution on a large geographic scale. Apart from the difficulty to directly monitor them by Remote Sensing and GIS technology, a particular challenge arises from the sampling limitations for this seasonal mushroom. This problem is common in geology, where underground mineral resources must be mapped without direct observations. Geologists apply the ‘Weights of Evidence’ method for such situations, and this approach may have potential for underground mushrooms as well. We thus constructed potential habitat maps for T. indicum using the Weights of Evidence method. Based on field survey and published sources, ten influential indicators associated with T. indicum were selected and mapped for Longyang district in southwestern Yunnan, China. Two predictive models were established from independent environmental layers. In order to build better understanding of the models’ predictive ability, apart from the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, the Area Adjusted Frequency (AAF) approach was also applied for model evaluation. For the final map, the best-performing model was selected. The resulting habitat map could provide guidance for future conservation activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xue-Qing & Kodikara, Gayantha R.L. & Luedeling, Eike & Yang, Xue-Fei & He, Jun & Liu, Pei-gui & Xu, Jian-Chu, 2012. "Looking below the ground: Prediction of Tuber indicum habitat using the Weights of Evidence method," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 27-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:247:y:2012:i:c:p:27-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001200381X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romero-Calcerrada, R. & Barrio-Parra, F. & Millington, J.D.A. & Novillo, C.J., 2010. "Spatial modelling of socioeconomic data to understand patterns of human-caused wildfire ignition risk in the SW of Madrid (central Spain)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 34-45.
    2. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franco-Maass, Sergio & Burrola-Aguilar, Cristina & Arana-Gabriel, Yolanda & García-Almaraz, Luis Antonio, 2016. "A local knowledge-based approach to predict anthropic harvesting pressure zones of wild edible mushrooms as a tool for forest conservation in Central Mexico," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 239-250.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    2. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    3. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    4. Marmion, Mathieu & Luoto, Miska & Heikkinen, Risto K. & Thuiller, Wilfried, 2009. "The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3512-3520.
    5. Kaiping Wang & Weiqi Wang & Niyi Zha & Yue Feng & Chenlan Qiu & Yunlu Zhang & Jia Ma & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Spatially Heterogeneity Response of Critical Ecosystem Service Capacity to Address Regional Development Risks to Rapid Urbanization: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.
    7. Rufino, Marta M. & Albouy, Camille & Brind'Amour, Anik, 2021. "Which spatial interpolators I should use? A case study applying to marine species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    8. Stoklosa, Jakub & Huang, Yih-Huei & Furlan, Elise & Hwang, Wen-Han, 2016. "On quadratic logistic regression models when predictor variables are subject to measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 109-121.
    9. Moreno-Amat, Elena & Mateo, Rubén G. & Nieto-Lugilde, Diego & Morueta-Holme, Naia & Svenning, Jens-Christian & García-Amorena, Ignacio, 2015. "Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 308-317.
    10. Sadasivuni, R. & Cooke, W.H. & Bhushan, S., 2013. "Wildfire risk prediction in Southeastern Mississippi using population interaction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 297-306.
    11. Margherita Carlucci & Ilaria Zambon & Andrea Colantoni & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Socioeconomic Development, Demographic Dynamics and Forest Fires in Italy, 1961–2017: A Time-Series Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Sahragard, H.P. & Chahouki, M.A. Zare, 2015. "An evaluation of predictive habitat models performance of plant species in Hoze soltan rangelands of Qom province," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 64-71.
    13. Halvorsen, Rune & Mazzoni, Sabrina & Dirksen, John Wirkola & Næsset, Erik & Gobakken, Terje & Ohlson, Mikael, 2016. "How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 108-118.
    14. Zhou, Demin & Gong, Huili & Liu, Zhaoli, 2008. "Integrated ecological assessment of biophysical wetland habitat in water catchments: Linking hydro-ecological modelling with geo-information techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 411-420.
    15. Flores, O. & Rossi, V. & Mortier, F., 2009. "Autocorrelation offsets zero-inflation in models of tropical saplings density," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1797-1809.
    16. Pliscoff, Patricio & Luebert, Federico & Hilger, Hartmut H. & Guisan, Antoine, 2014. "Effects of alternative sets of climatic predictors on species distribution models and associated estimates of extinction risk: A test with plants in an arid environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 166-177.
    17. Yvonne Milker & Manuel F G Weinkauf & Jürgen Titschack & Andre Freiwald & Stefan Krüger & Frans J Jorissen & Gerhard Schmiedl, 2017. "Testing the applicability of a benthic foraminiferal-based transfer function for the reconstruction of paleowater depth changes in Rhodes (Greece) during the early Pleistocene," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, November.
    18. Francesca Raffini & Giorgio Bertorelle & Roberto Biello & Guido D’Urso & Danilo Russo & Luciano Bosso, 2020. "From Nucleotides to Satellite Imagery: Approaches to Identify and Manage the Invasive Pathogen Xylella fastidiosa and Its Insect Vectors in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-38, June.
    19. Ballet, Jérôme & Bazin, Damien Jérôme Albert & Komena, Boniface K., 2020. "Unequal capabilities and natural resource management: The case of Côte d’Ivoire," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Habeebullah Jayeola Oladipo & Yusuf Amuda Tajudeen & Iyiola Olatunji Oladunjoye & Sheriff Taye Mustapha & Yusuff Inaolaji Sodiq & Rashidat Onyinoyi Yusuf & Oluwaseyi Muyiwa Egbewande & Abdulbasit Opey, 2023. "Adopting a Statistical, Mechanistic, Integrated Surveillance, Thermal Biology, and Holistic (SMITH) Approach for Arbovirus Control in a Changing Climate: A Review of Evidence," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:247:y:2012:i:c:p:27-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.