IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v273y2014icp55-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Friction based social force model for social foraging of sheep flock

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhaofeng
  • Jiang, Yichuan

Abstract

Social foraging of large herbivores shows collective behaviors of movement and grazing. Conspecific effects and interactions between individual and food distribution are known as important factors to influence foraging behaviors of sheep. Many rules of movement have been designed largely depending on conspecific effects. However, few simulation methods consider individual interactions with food distribution. In this paper, we first introduce instinct of feeding to represent individual interaction with currently located patch and then propose a novel friction based social force model to simulate different behaviors in social foraging. Friction force quantifies individual instinct of feeding on currently located patch since conspecific effects and attractions of food in other patches are external forces causing positional adjustment. In our model, agent decides to move if external forces are larger than current friction force and the destination patch can provide enough friction force to resist external forces. This result shows variable effects of instinct of feeding on social foraging and exhibits typical tortuous migration paths and departure-following collective movement of sheep flock. Our model emphasizes the importance of individual interactions with food distribution and may provide new insights into the mechanism governing internal decision process.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhaofeng & Jiang, Yichuan, 2014. "Friction based social force model for social foraging of sheep flock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 55-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:273:y:2014:i:c:p:55-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013005280
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel L. Kendal & Isabelle Coolen & Kevin N. Laland, 2004. "The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 269-277, March.
    2. Leeann T. Reaney & Patricia R.Y. Backwell, 2007. "Risk-taking behavior predicts aggression and mating success in a fiddler crab," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 521-525.
    3. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    4. Niizato, Takayuki & Gunji, Yukio-Pegio, 2011. "Metric–topological interaction model of collective behavior," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(17), pages 3041-3049.
    5. H.J. de Knegt & G.M. Hengeveld & F. van Langevelde & W.F. de Boer & K.P. Kirkman, 2007. "Patch density determines movement patterns and foraging efficiency of large herbivores," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 1065-1072.
    6. Pablo Michelena & Angela M. Sibbald & Hans W. Erhard & James E. McLeod, 2009. "Effects of group size and personality on social foraging: the distribution of sheep across patches," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 145-152.
    7. Marie-Hélène Pillot & Jacques Gautrais & Patrick Arrufat & Iain D Couzin & Richard Bon & Jean-Louis Deneubourg, 2011. "Scalable Rules for Coherent Group Motion in a Gregarious Vertebrate," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, January.
    8. John R.G. Dyer & Darren P. Croft & Lesley J. Morrell & Jens Krause, 2009. "Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 165-171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierrot Derjany & Sirish Namilae & Dahai Liu & Ashok Srinivasan, 2020. "Multiscale model for the optimal design of pedestrian queues to mitigate infectious disease spread," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Namilae, S. & Srinivasan, A. & Mubayi, A. & Scotch, M. & Pahle, R., 2017. "Self-propelled pedestrian dynamics model: Application to passenger movement and infection propagation in airplanes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 248-260.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stock, Eduardo Velasco & da Silva, Roberto, 2023. "Lattice gas model to describe a nightclub dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Varas, A. & Cornejo, M.D. & Mainemer, D. & Toledo, B. & Rogan, J. & Muñoz, V. & Valdivia, J.A., 2007. "Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 382(2), pages 631-642.
    3. Murilo S Baptista & Hai-Peng Ren & Johen C M Swarts & Rodrigo Carareto & Henk Nijmeijer & Celso Grebogi, 2012. "Collective Almost Synchronisation in Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Chen, Changkun & Sun, Huakai & Lei, Peng & Zhao, Dongyue & Shi, Congling, 2021. "An extended model for crowd evacuation considering pedestrian panic in artificial attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    6. Michael Batty & Jake Desyllas & Elspeth Duxbury, 2003. "Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1573-1590, July.
    7. Ma, Jian & Song, Wei-guo & Zhang, Jun & Lo, Siu-ming & Liao, Guang-xuan, 2010. "k-Nearest-Neighbor interaction induced self-organized pedestrian counter flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(10), pages 2101-2117.
    8. Lara Zirbes & Yves Brostaux & Mark Mescher & Maxime Jason & Eric Haubruge & Jean-Louis Deneubourg, 2012. "Self-Assemblage and Quorum in the Earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaete, Lumbricidae)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Illés J Farkas & Shuohong Wang, 2018. "Spatial flocking: Control by speed, distance, noise and delay," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Zheng, Yaochen & Chen, Jianqiao & Wei, Junhong & Guo, Xiwei, 2012. "Modeling of pedestrian evacuation based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(17), pages 4225-4233.
    11. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    12. Sungryong Bae & Jun-Ho Choi & Hong Sun Ryou, 2020. "Modification of Interaction Forces between Smoke and Evacuees," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
    13. Lasse Pedersen, 2009. "When Everyone Runs for the Exit," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 5(4), pages 177-199, December.
    14. Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Sarvi, Majid, 2013. "Understanding pedestrian crowd panic: a review on model organisms approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 12-17.
    15. Ofer Tchernichovski & Marissa King & Peter Brinkmann & Xanadu Halkias & Daniel Fimiarz & Laurent Mars & Dalton Conley, 2017. "Tradeoff Between Distributed Social Learning and Herding Effect in Online Rating Systems," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    16. Krbálek, Milan & Hrabák, Pavel & Bukáček, Marek, 2018. "Pedestrian headways — Reflection of territorial social forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 38-49.
    17. Marina E Wosniack & Marcos C Santos & Ernesto P Raposo & Gandhi M Viswanathan & Marcos G E da Luz, 2017. "The evolutionary origins of Lévy walk foraging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Natalie Fridman & Gal A. Kaminka, 2010. "Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 348-372, December.
    19. Dirk Helbing & Pratik Mukerji, "undated". "Crowd Disasters as Systemic Failures: Analysis of the Love Parade Disaster," Working Papers ETH-RC-12-010, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    20. Liu, Qian, 2018. "A social force model for the crowd evacuation in a terrorist attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 315-330.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:273:y:2014:i:c:p:55-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.