IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v269y2013icp9-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes

Author

Listed:
  • Shcheglovitova, Mariya
  • Anderson, Robert P.

Abstract

Algorithms for producing ecological niche models and species distribution models are widely applied in biogeography and conservation biology. However, in some cases models produced by these algorithms may not represent optimal levels of complexity and, hence, likely either overestimate or underestimate the species’ ecological tolerances. Here, we evaluate a delete-one jackknife approach for tuning model settings to approximate optimal model complexity and enhance predictions for datasets with few (here, <10) occurrence records. We apply this approach to tune two settings that regulate model complexity (feature class and regularization multiplier) in the presence-background modeling program Maxent for two species of spiny pocket mice in Ecuador and southwestern Colombia. For these datasets, we identified an optimal feature class parameter that is more complex than the default. Highly complex features are not typically recommended for use with small sample sizes in Maxent. However, when coupled with higher regularization, complex features (that allow more flexible responses to environmental variables) can obtain models that out-perform those built using default settings (employing less complex feature classes). Although small sample sizes remain a serious limitation to model building, this jackknife optimization approach can be used for species with few localities (

Suggested Citation

  • Shcheglovitova, Mariya & Anderson, Robert P., 2013. "Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 9-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:269:y:2013:i:c:p:9-17
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013004043
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.08.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Robert P. & Gonzalez, Israel, 2011. "Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2796-2811.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolke Tobón-Niedfeldt & Alicia Mastretta-Yanes & Tania Urquiza-Haas & Bárbara Goettsch & Angela P. Cuervo-Robayo & Esmeralda Urquiza-Haas & M. Andrea Orjuela-R & Francisca Acevedo Gasman & Oswaldo Oli, 2022. "Incorporating evolutionary and threat processes into crop wild relatives conservation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Muhammad Waheed & Shiekh Marifatul Haq & Fahim Arshad & Muhammad Azhar Jameel & Manzer H. Siddiqui & Rainer W. Bussmann & Nabeel Manshoor & Saud Alamri, 2023. "Where Will Threatened Aegle marmelos L., a Tree of the Semi-Arid Region, Go under Climate Change? Implications for the Reintroduction of the Species," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Holder, Anna M. & Markarian, Arev & Doyle, Jessie M. & Olson, John R., 2020. "Predicting geographic distributions of fishes in remote stream networks using maximum entropy modeling and landscape characterizations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 433(C).
    4. Duque-Lazo, J. & van Gils, H. & Groen, T.A. & Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M., 2016. "Transferability of species distribution models: The case of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Southwest Spain and Southwest Australia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 62-70.
    5. Moreno-Amat, Elena & Mateo, Rubén G. & Nieto-Lugilde, Diego & Morueta-Holme, Naia & Svenning, Jens-Christian & García-Amorena, Ignacio, 2015. "Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 308-317.
    6. Halvorsen, Rune & Mazzoni, Sabrina & Dirksen, John Wirkola & Næsset, Erik & Gobakken, Terje & Ohlson, Mikael, 2016. "How important are choice of model selection method and spatial autocorrelation of presence data for distribution modelling by MaxEnt?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 108-118.
    7. Herkt, K. Matthias B. & Barnikel, Günter & Skidmore, Andrew K. & Fahr, Jakob, 2016. "A high-resolution model of bat diversity and endemism for continental Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 9-28.
    8. Worthington, Thomas A. & Zhang, Tianjiao & Logue, Daniel R. & Mittelstet, Aaron R. & Brewer, Shannon K., 2016. "Landscape and flow metrics affecting the distribution of a federally-threatened fish: Improving management, model fit, and model transferability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 1-18.
    9. Peng Su & Anyu Zhang & Ran Wang & Jing’ai Wang & Yuan Gao & Fenggui Liu, 2021. "Prediction of Future Natural Suitable Areas for Rice under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Xumin Li & Zhiwen Yao & Qing Yuan & Rui Xing & Yuqin Guo & Dejun Zhang & Israr Ahmad & Wenhui Liu & Hairui Liu, 2023. "Prediction of Potential Distribution Area of Two Parapatric Species in Triosteum under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Maria Elena Castiello & Emmanuele Russo & Héctor Martínez-Grau & Ana Jesus & Georgina Prats & Ferran Antolín, 2025. "Understanding the spread of agriculture in the Western Mediterranean (6th-3rd millennia BC) with Machine Learning tools," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Hallgren, W. & Santana, F. & Low-Choy, S. & Zhao, Y. & Mackey, B., 2019. "Species distribution models can be highly sensitive to algorithm configuration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Cao, Yong & DeWalt, R. Edward & Robinson, Jason L. & Tweddale, Tari & Hinz, Leon & Pessino, Massimo, 2013. "Using Maxent to model the historic distributions of stonefly species in Illinois streams: The effects of regularization and threshold selections," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 30-39.
    14. Martín-García, Laura & González-Lorenzo, Gustavo & Brito-Izquierdo, Isabel T. & Barquín-Diez, Jacinto, 2013. "Use of topographic predictors for macrobenthic community mapping in the Marine Reserve of La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 19-31.
    15. Wiltshire, Kathryn H & Tanner, Jason E, 2020. "Comparing maximum entropy modelling methods to inform aquaculture site selection for novel seaweed species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    16. Schmidt, Heiko & Radinger, Johannes & Teschlade, Daniel & Stoll, Stefan, 2020. "The role of spatial units in modelling freshwater fish distributions: Comparing a subcatchment and river network approach using MaxEnt," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    17. Schartel, Tyler E. & Cao, Yong, 2024. "Background selection complexity influences Maxent predictive performance in freshwater systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    18. Fois, Mauro & Cuena-Lombraña, Alba & Fenu, Giuseppe & Bacchetta, Gianluigi, 2018. "Using species distribution models at local scale to guide the search of poorly known species: Review, methodological issues and future directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 124-132.
    19. Santiago José Elías Velazco & Franklin Galvão & Fabricio Villalobos & Paulo De Marco Júnior, 2017. "Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Pimenta, Mayra & Andrade, André Felipe Alves de & Fernandes, Fernando Hiago Souza & Amboni, Mayra Pereira de Melo & Almeida, Renata Silva & Soares, Ana Hermínia Simões de Bello & Falcon, Guth Berger &, 2022. "One size does not fit all: Priority areas for real world problems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:269:y:2013:i:c:p:9-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.