IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v212y2008i3p372-381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods

Author

Listed:
  • LaRue, Michelle A.
  • Nielsen, Clayton K.

Abstract

Since 1990, cougar (Puma concolor) presence in midwestern North America has been increasing, with >130 confirmed cougar occurrences (i.e., tracks, photos, carcasses) being verified by professional wildlife biologists during this time. Because many of these confirmed cougar occurrences (>30%) have been carcasses of juvenile males, it is likely that cougars are dispersing into the Midwest from established western populations. Although several wildlife biologists have acknowledged the possibility of cougar presence in the region, no research has been conducted regarding potential corridors that may facilitate dispersal. Therefore, our goal was to determine potential dispersal corridors for cougars in a 9-state portion of the Midwest using a habitat suitability model and least-cost path analysis. We modelled 2-km wide dispersal corridors from established western cougar populations to (1) large areas (≥2500km2) of highly suitable cougar habitat, and (2) locations of confirmed cougar occurrences (n=29) in North Dakota, Nebraska, and Missouri. The most likely dispersal corridor to large areas of highly suitable cougar habitat originated in western Texas and branched into the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests of Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Missouri. Within this corridor, road density was low (79m/km2) and forests comprised 45% of land cover; these results are consistent with empirical studies that indicate dispersing cougars travel in habitat that provides cover while generally avoiding human influence. Corridor lengths from potential source populations to confirmed cougar occurrences ranged from 3km to 1100km, stream density (i.e., an index of riparian zones) ranged from 79m/km2 to 249m/km2, and grassland cover comprised >40% of corridors from occupied cougar habitat to confirmed occurrences. High grassland cover and riparian zones within these corridors may allow for movement between forest patches while dispersing through the highly agricultural Midwest. Our analysis provides the first description of potential dispersal corridors for cougars from established western populations into the Midwest. Primary benefits from this research include providing an understanding of landscape permeability for large carnivores in a largely unsuitable matrix, and presenting conservation agencies with useful information should cougars continue to disperse into the region.

Suggested Citation

  • LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2008. "Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 372-381.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:212:y:2008:i:3:p:372-381
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.10.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380007005595
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.10.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stricker, Heather K. & Gehring, Thomas M. & Donner, Deahn & Petroelje, Tyler, 2019. "Multi-scale habitat selection model assessing potential gray wolf den habitat and dispersal corridors in Michigan, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 84-94.
    2. Yibo Xu & Xiaohuang Liu & Lianrong Zhao & Jiufen Liu & Xiaofeng Zhao & Hongyu Li & Chao Wang & Honghui Zhao & Ran Wang & Xinping Luo & Liyuan Xing, 2024. "Prediction of Potential Suitability Areas for Ephedra sinica in the Five Northwestern Provinces of China Under Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Chi, Yuan & Xie, Zuolun & Wang, Jing, 2019. "Establishing archipelagic landscape ecological network with full connectivity at dual spatial scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 54-65.
    4. Erin L Koen & Colin J Garroway & Paul J Wilson & Jeff Bowman, 2010. "The Effect of Map Boundary on Estimates of Landscape Resistance to Animal Movement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-8, July.
    5. An, Yi & Liu, Shiliang & Sun, Yongxiu & Shi, Fangning & Zhao, Shuang, 2020. "Negative effects of farmland expansion on multi-species landscape connectivity in a tropical region in Southwest China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Shaokun Zhou & Yuhong Song & Yijiao Li & Jing Wang & Lan Zhang, 2022. "Construction of Ecological Security Pattern for Plateau Lake Based on MSPA–MCR Model: A Case Study of Dianchi Lake Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    7. LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2011. "Modelling potential habitat for cougars in midwestern North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 897-900.
    8. Federica Isola & Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2024. "Urban Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Service Supply: A Study Concerning the Functional Urban Area of Cagliari, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-37, October.
    9. Federica Isola & Sabrina Lai & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2022. "Strengthening a Regional Green Infrastructure through Improved Multifunctionality and Connectedness: Policy Suggestions from Sardinia, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    10. An, Yi & Liu, Shiliang & Sun, Yongxiu & Shi, Fangning & Liu, Yixuan & Beazley, Robert, 2021. "Determining the importance of core areas in the alpine shrub-meadow gradient zone of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    11. Li, Hailong & Li, Dihua & Li, Ting & Qiao, Qing & Yang, Jian & Zhang, Hemin, 2010. "Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake—Case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(6), pages 944-952.
    12. LaRue, Michelle A. & Nielsen, Clayton K., 2016. "Population viability of recolonizing cougars in midwestern North America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 121-129.
    13. Hassène Aissi & Salem Chakhar & Vincent Mousseau, 2012. "GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation Approach for Corridor Siting," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(2), pages 287-307, April.
    14. Rong Guo & Yujing Bai, 2019. "Simulation of an Urban-Rural Spatial Structure on the Basis of Green Infrastructure Assessment: The Case of Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Nichols, J.M. & Spendelow, J.A. & Nichols, J.D., 2017. "Using Optimal Transport Theory to Estimate Transition Probabilities in Metapopulation Dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 311-319.
    16. Biljana Savić & Alevtina Evgrafova & Cenk Donmez & Filip Vasić & Michael Glemnitz & Carsten Paul, 2021. "Assessing the Role of Kettle Holes for Providing and Connecting Amphibian Habitats in Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Federica Isola & Federica Leone & Corrado Zoppi, 2022. "Mapping of Ecological Corridors as Connections between Protected Areas: A Study Concerning Sardinia, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, May.
    18. Jung A Lee & Jinhyung Chon & Changwoo Ahn, 2014. "Planning Landscape Corridors in Ecological Infrastructure Using Least-Cost Path Methods Based on the Value of Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:212:y:2008:i:3:p:372-381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.