IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v215y2024ics0921800923002768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Transitional Gains Trap in Grandfathered Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries

Author

Listed:
  • Byrne, Conor
  • Oostdijk, Maartje
  • Agnarsson, Sveinn
  • Davidsdottir, Brynhildur

Abstract

Trade in freely granted individual rights has been speculated to gradually reduce the political feasibility of reallocation, as the initial recipients who enjoy windfall profits are replaced by rights holders who purchased their rights and would unfairly become loss-making if the rights were subsequently reallocated. This hypothesis, sometimes referred to as a Transitional Gains Trap, may be relevant when evaluating alternative methods of allocating rights. This paper presents a potential indicator for investigating the Transitional Gains Trap in grandfathered individual transferable quota fisheries, based on the cumulative amount invested in quota after allowing for offsetting windfall profits, relative to the total value of all quota. The indicator ranges between 0% and 100%, with higher values indicating more net investment and a greater threat of a Transitional Gains Trap. Illustrative calculations for Iceland's ITQ system, introduced in 1991, yield a value of 29% by 2016, suggesting that the Transitional Gains Trap is not a major constraint, although the results vary by species and are sensitive to assumptions. Finally, the indicator is shown to decrease over time under certain conditions, implying that the potential relevance of the Transitional Gains Trap is context-specific.

Suggested Citation

  • Byrne, Conor & Oostdijk, Maartje & Agnarsson, Sveinn & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur, 2024. "The Transitional Gains Trap in Grandfathered Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:215:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923002768
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923002768
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Copes, Parzival & Charles, Anthony, 2004. "Socioeconomics of Individual Transferable Quotas and Community-Based Fishery Management," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 171-181, October.
    2. Johanna Gisladottir & Sigurbjörg Sigurgeirsdottir & Kristín Vala Ragnarsdóttir & Ingrid Stjernquist, 2021. "Economies of Scale and Perceived Corruption in Natural Resource Management: A Comparative Study between Ukraine, Romania, and Iceland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Roderick Duncan, 2006. "Price or politics? An investigation of the causes of expropriation," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(1), pages 85-101, March.
    4. Mads Greaker & Lars Lindholt, 2022. "The Resource Rent in Norwegian Aquaculture from 1984 to 2020 – Is the Rent Ripe for Taxation?," Working Papers 202201, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo Business School.
    5. Sergei Guriev & Anton Kolotilin & Konstantin Sonin, 2011. "Determinants of Nationalization in the Oil Sector: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 301-323.
    6. Parzival Copes, 1986. "A Critical Review of the Individual Quota as a Device in Fisheries Management," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 62(3), pages 278-291.
    7. Holland, Daniel S. & Thunberg, Eric & Agar, Juan & Crosson, Scott & Demarest, Chad & Kasperski, Stephen & Perruso, Larry & Steiner, Erin & Stephen, Jessica & Strelcheck, Andy & Travis, Mike, 2015. "US catch share markets: a review of data availability and impediments to transparent markets," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 103-110.
    8. Eythórsson, Einar, 2000. "A decade of ITQ-management in Icelandic fisheries: consolidation without consensus," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 483-492, November.
    9. Sam Cunningham & Lori S. Bennear & Martin D. Smith, 2016. "Spillovers in Regional Fisheries Management: Do Catch Shares Cause Leakage?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(2), pages 344-362.
    10. Michael C. Melnychuk & Hiroyuki Kurota & Pamela M. Mace & Maite Pons & Cóilín Minto & Giacomo Chato Osio & Olaf P. Jensen & Carryn L. de Moor & Ana M. Parma & L. Richard Little & Daniel Hively & Charm, 2021. "Identifying management actions that promote sustainable fisheries," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 440-449, May.
    11. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2013. "Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 173-192, Spring.
    12. Anna M. Birkenbach & David J. Kaczan & Martin D. Smith, 2017. "Catch shares slow the race to fish," Nature, Nature, vol. 544(7649), pages 223-226, April.
    13. Todd L. Cherry & Peter Frykblom & Jason F. Shogren, 2002. "Hardnose the Dictator," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1218-1221, September.
    14. Holcombe,Randall G., 2018. "Political Capitalism," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108449908, November.
    15. Oxoby, Robert J. & Spraggon, John, 2008. "Mine and yours: Property rights in dictator games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(3-4), pages 703-713, March.
    16. Raymond, Leigh, 2019. "Policy perspective:Building political support for carbon pricing—Lessons from cap-and-trade policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Soliman, Adam, 2014. "Using individual transferable quotas (ITQs) to achieve social policy objectives: A proposed intervention," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 76-81.
    18. Bromley, David W., 2015. "Correcting the Whimsies of U.S. Fisheries Policy," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(4), pages 1-8, November.
    19. Abdulrahman Ben-Hasan & Santiago De La Puente & Diana Flores & Michael C. Melnychuk & Emily Tivoli & Villy Christensen & Wei Cui & Carl J. Walters, 2021. "Constrained public benefits from global catch share fisheries," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(39), pages 2021580118-, September.
    20. Richard Barichello & John Cranfield & Karl Meilke, 2009. "Options for the Reform of Supply Management in Canada with Trade Liberalization," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 35(2), pages 203-217, June.
    21. Rögnvaldur Hannesson, 2017. "Fish Quota Prices in Norway," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 109-117.
    22. Goulder, Lawrence H. & Hafstead, Marc A.C. & Dworsky, Michael, 2010. "Impacts of alternative emissions allowance allocation methods under a federal cap-and-trade program," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 161-181, November.
    23. Asche, Frank & Eggert, Håkan & Gudmundsson, Eyjolfur & Hoff, Ayoe & Pascoe, Sean, 2008. "Fisher's behaviour with individual vessel quotas--Over-capacity and potential rent: Five case studies," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 920-927, November.
    24. Grafton, R Quentin & Squires, Dale & Fox, Kevin J, 2000. "Private Property and Economic Efficiency: A Study of a Common-Pool Resource," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 679-713, October.
    25. Michael C. Munger, 2019. "Tullock and the welfare costs of corruption: there is a “political Coase Theorem”," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 83-100, October.
    26. Macinko, Seth, 2014. "Lipstick and catch shares in the Western Pacific: Beyond evangelism in fisheries policy?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-41.
    27. Oostdijk, Maartje & Santos, Maria J. & Agnarsson, Sveinn & Woods, Pamela J., 2019. "Structure and evolution of cod quota market networks in Iceland over times of financial volatility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 279-290.
    28. Anferova, Elena & Vetemaa, Markus & Hannesson, Rögnvaldur, 2005. "Fish quota auctions in the Russian Far East: a failed experiment," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 47-56, January.
    29. Grimm, Dietmar & Barkhorn, Ivan & Festa, David & Bonzon, Kate & Boomhower, Judd & Hovland, Valerie & Blau, Jason, 2012. "Assessing catch shares' effects evidence from Federal United States and associated British Columbian fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 644-657.
    30. Lynham, John, 2014. "How have catch shares been allocated?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 42-48.
    31. Emmanuelle Quillérou & Olivier Guyader, 2012. "What is behind fleet evolution: a framework for flow analysis and application to the French Atlantic fleet," Post-Print hal-00815466, HAL.
    32. Flaaten, Ola, 2010. "Fisheries rent creation and distribution--the imaginary case of Codland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1268-1272, November.
    33. Gordon Tullock, 1975. "The Transitional Gains Trap," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 6(2), pages 671-678, Autumn.
    34. Ola Flaaten & Knut Heen & Thórólfur Matthíasson, 2017. "Profit and Resource Rent in Fisheries," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(3), pages 311-328.
    35. Pinkerton, Evelyn & Edwards, Danielle N., 2009. "The elephant in the room: The hidden costs of leasing individual transferable fishing quotas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 707-713, July.
    36. Christopher Costello & John Lynham & Sarah E. Lester & Steven D. Gaines, 2010. "Economic Incentives and Global Fisheries Sustainability," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 299-318, October.
    37. Newell, Richard G. & Papps, Kerry L. & Sanchirico, James N., 2005. "Asset Pricing in Created Markets for Fishing Quotas," Discussion Papers 10639, Resources for the Future.
    38. R. Quentin Grafton & John Williams, 2020. "Rent-seeking behaviour and regulatory capture in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2-3), pages 484-504, March.
    39. Corbett A. Grainger & Dominic P. Parker, 2013. "The Political Economy of Fishery Reform," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 5(1), pages 369-386, June.
    40. Duncan, Roderick, 2006. "Price or politics? An investigation of the causes of expropriation," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-17, March.
    41. Randall G. Holcombe, 2019. "Transitional gains and rent extraction," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 127-139, October.
    42. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2019. "Rents and economic development: the perspective of Why Nations Fail," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 13-28, October.
    43. Matulich, Scott C. & Mittelhammer, Ron C. & Reberte, Carlos, 1996. "Toward a More Complete Model of Individual Transferable Fishing Quotas: Implications of Incorporating the Processing Sector," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 112-128, July.
    44. Copes, Parzival & Charles, Anthony T., 2004. "Socioeconomics of Individual Transferable Quotas and Community-Based Fishery Management," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 33(2), pages 1-11, October.
    45. Knútsson, Ögmundur & Kristófersson, Daði Már & Gestsson, Helgi, 2016. "The effects of fisheries management on the Icelandic demersal fish value chain," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 172-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holzer, Jorge & McConnell, Kenneth, 2023. "Extraction rights allocation with liquidity constraints," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. repec:ags:aaea22:335749 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Emmanuelle Quillérou & Nolwenn Roudaut & Olivier Guyader, 2013. "Managing fleet capacity effectively under second-hand market redistribution," Post-Print hal-00835574, HAL.
    4. Speir, Cameron & Lee, Min-Yang, 2021. "Geographic Distribution of Commercial Fishing Landings and Port Consolidation Following ITQ Implementation," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(1), January.
    5. Chang, Roberto & Hevia, Constantino & Loayza, Norman, 2018. "Privatization And Nationalization Cycles," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 331-361, March.
    6. Henrik Egbert & Teodor Sedlarski, 2020. "The foundations of contemporary economics: Gordon Tullock and public choice," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 107-118.
    7. Azaguagh, Ismail & Driouchi, Ahmed, 2018. "Understanding Commons and Anticommons in different economic contexts," MPRA Paper 116621, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Nathan M. Jensen & Noel P. Johnston & Chia-yi Lee & Hadi Sahin, 2020. "Crisis and contract breach: The domestic and international determinants of expropriation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 869-898, October.
    9. Pinkerton, Evelyn, 2015. "The role of moral economy in two British Columbia fisheries: Confronting neoliberal policies," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 410-419.
    10. Carothers, Courtney, 2015. "Fisheries privatization, social transitions, and well-being in Kodiak, Alaska," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 313-322.
    11. Matthew N. Reimer & Joshua K. Abbott & James E. Wilen, 2014. "Unraveling the Multiple Margins of Rent Generation from Individual Transferable Quotas," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(3), pages 538-559.
    12. Pinkerton, Evelyn & Davis, Reade, 2015. "Neoliberalism and the politics of enclosure in North American small-scale fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 303-312.
    13. Oostdijk, Maartje & Santos, Maria J. & Agnarsson, Sveinn & Woods, Pamela J., 2019. "Structure and evolution of cod quota market networks in Iceland over times of financial volatility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 279-290.
    14. Lucchetti, Alessandro & Piccinetti, Corrado & Meconi, Uriano & Frittelloni, Cristina & Marchesan, Mara & Palladino, Silvia & Virgili, Massimo, 2014. "Transferable Fishing Concessions (TFC): A pilot study on the applicability in the Mediterranean Sea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 438-447.
    15. Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio, 2014. "Cooperation in common property regimes under extreme drought conditions: Empirical evidence from the use of pooled transferable quotas in Spanish irrigation systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 482-493.
    16. Tim Gray, 2024. "Fishing for Principles: The Fairness of Fishing Quota Allocations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Zhou, Rong & Segerson, Kathleen, 2014. "Individual vs. Collective Quotas in Fisheries Management: Efficiency and Distributional Impacts," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170601, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Sutherland, Sara A. & Edwards, Eric C., 2019. "Community Impacts of Fishery Privatization," CEnREP Working Papers 340061, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Péreau, J.-C. & Doyen, L. & Little, L.R. & Thébaud, O., 2012. "The triple bottom line: Meeting ecological, economic and social goals with individual transferable quotas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 419-434.
    20. Emin Karagözoğlu & Elif Tosun, 2022. "Endogenous Game Choice and Giving Behavior in Distribution Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, November.
    21. Soliman, Adam, 2014. "Using individual transferable quotas (ITQs) to achieve social policy objectives: A proposed intervention," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 76-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:215:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923002768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.