IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v137y2024ics0264999324001354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of windfall tax on market dynamics: A Cournot oligopoly model with exogenous shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Nálepová, Veronika
  • Lampart, Marek

Abstract

This study explores the nuanced impact of windfall taxes on market equilibrium, introducing an innovative approach within the Cournot oligopoly framework. The paper uses the 0–1 test for chaos to dissect how profit taxation can stabilize market behaviors under bounded rationality. It suggests that higher taxes may prevent collusion, thereby promoting a more competitive environment. The paper demonstrates that while windfall taxes leave regular markets almost unaffected, they can protect firms in chaotic states from adverse outcomes. This research underscores the necessity for policymakers to tailor windfall tax strategies to specific market conditions, potentially driving enhanced market efficiency. Our insights advocate for the judicious application of windfall taxes, which could significantly shape future economic policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nálepová, Veronika & Lampart, Marek, 2024. "Impact of windfall tax on market dynamics: A Cournot oligopoly model with exogenous shocks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:137:y:2024:i:c:s0264999324001354
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324001354
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naimzada, A.K. & Tramontana, F., 2012. "Dynamic properties of a Cournot–Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1436-1439.
    2. Lambertini, Luca & Tampieri, Alessandro, 2015. "Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 40-48.
    3. Laszlo Goerke, 2017. "Tax evasion in a Cournot oligopoly with endogenous entry," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(5), pages 754-779, September.
    4. Danca, Marius-F. & Lampart, Marek, 2021. "Hidden and self-excited attractors in a heterogeneous Cournot oligopoly model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Basu, Kaushik & Pitsuwan, Fikri & Zhang, Pengfei, 2023. "The economics of profit-cap policy: Big Pharma, Big Tech, and the duopoly rule," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 120-133.
    6. Janeba, Eckhard & Schjelderup, Guttorm, 2023. "The global minimum tax raises more revenues than you think, or much less," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Baldini, Massimo & Lambertini, Luca, 2011. "Profit taxation and capital accumulation in a dynamic oligopoly model," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 13-18, January.
    8. Zhou, Jie & Zhou, Wei & Chu, Tong & Chang, Ying-xiang & Huang, Meng-jia, 2019. "Bifurcation, intermittent chaos and multi-stability in a two-stage Cournot game with R&D spillover and product differentiation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 358-378.
    9. Schmitt, Noemi & Tuinstra, Jan & Westerhoff, Frank, 2017. "Side effects of nonlinear profit taxes in an evolutionary market entry model: Abrupt changes, coexisting attractors and hysteresis problems," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 15-38.
    10. Xu, Lili & Cho, Sumi & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2016. "Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot–Bertrand comparison," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 73-82.
    11. Giacomo Cucignatto & Nadia Garbellini & Facund Fora Alcalde, 2023. "Profit-led or cost-led inflation? Propagation effects through the EU inter-industry network," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 76(306), pages 261-276.
    12. Fenglian Wang & Chia-Huei Wu & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2020. "An Empirical Study of a Mathematical Model for Influence of Government Tax on the Price Behavior and the Stability of Market Price," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-9, September.
    13. Naoto Aoyama & Emilson C. D. Silva, 2022. "Abatement innovation in a Cournot oligopoly: emission versus output tax incentives," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 325-350, April.
    14. Lampart, Marek, 2012. "Stability of the Cournot equilibrium for a Cournot oligopoly model with n competitors," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1081-1085.
    15. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2012. "The dynamics of a differentiated duopoly with quantity competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 421-427.
    16. Levin, Dan, 1985. "Taxation within Cournot oligopoly," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 281-290, August.
    17. Shafik Hebous, 2023. "Has the Time Come for Excess Profit Taxes?," EconPol Policy Brief 49, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    18. Marek Lampart & Alžběta Lampartová, 2020. "Chaos Control and Anti-Control of the Heterogeneous Cournot Oligopoly Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Mr. Shafik Hebous & Dinar Prihardini & Nate Vernon-Lin, 2022. "Excess Profit Taxes: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Relevance," IMF Working Papers 2022/187, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Häckner, Jonas & Herzing, Mathias, 2016. "Welfare effects of taxation in oligopolistic markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 141-166.
    21. Furth, Dave, 1986. "Stability and instability in oligopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 197-228, December.
    22. Nirupama L. Rao, 2018. "Taxes and US Oil Production: Evidence from California and the Windfall Profit Tax," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 268-301, November.
    23. Junhai Ma & Hongliang Tu, 2012. "Complexity of a Duopoly Game in the Electricity Market with Delayed Bounded Rationality," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-13, December.
    24. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu, 2024. "Examining the effect of the UK oil and gas windfall tax on the economics of new fields in the UKCS province," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    25. Isabella M. Webe & Evan Wasner, 2023. "Sellers’ inflation, profits and conflict: why can large firms hike prices in an emergency?," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 183-213, April.
    26. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2020. "Delay Stability of n -Firm Cournot Oligopolies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    27. Ma, Jun-Hai & Ji, Wei-Zhuo, 2009. "Complexity of repeated game model in electric power triopoly," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1735-1740.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Sang-Ho & Park, Chul-Hi, 2020. "Environmental Regulations in Private and Mixed Duopolies: Emission Taxes versus Green R&D Subsidies," MPRA Paper 98833, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Xu, Lili & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2018. "The timing of environmental policies with excess burden of taxation in free-entry mixed markets," MPRA Paper 83560, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. S. S. Askar & Mona F. EL-Wakeel & M. A. Alrodaini, 2018. "Exploration of Complex Dynamics for Cournot Oligopoly Game with Differentiated Products," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, February.
    4. Sameh Askar & Abdulaziz Foul & Tarek Mahrous & Saleh Djemele & Emad Ibrahim, 2021. "Global and Local Analysis for a Cournot Duopoly Game with Two Different Objective Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Arturo García & Mariel Leal & Sang-Ho Lee, 2019. "Endogenous Timing with a Socially Responsible Firm," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 35, pages 345-370.
    6. Sumi Cho & Sang‐Ho Lee & Xoan T. Hoang, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and strategic trade policy: An endogenous timing game and its policy implications," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 480-497, December.
    7. Andaluz, J. & Elsadany, A.A. & Jarne, G., 2023. "Dynamic behavior in a Cournot duopoly with social responsibility," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Agliari, A. & Naimzada, A.K. & Pecora, N., 2016. "Nonlinear dynamics of a Cournot duopoly game with differentiated products," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 281(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Takahara, Tsuyoshi, 2022. "Quality competition, location choice, and ownership conversion in the healthcare market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Lili Xu & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2022. "Non‐cooperative and cooperative environmental corporate social responsibility with emission taxes," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2849-2862, October.
    11. García, Arturo & Leal, Mariel & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2018. "Time-inconsistent environmental policies with a consumer-friendly firm: Tradable permits versus emission tax," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 523-537.
    12. Mariel Leal & Arturo Garcia & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2019. "Excess Burden of Taxation and Environmental Policy Mix with a Consumer‐Friendly Firm," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 70(4), pages 517-536, December.
    13. Giacomo Cucignatto & Nadia Garbellini & Facund Fora Alcalde, 2023. "Profit-led or cost-led inflation? Propagation effects through the EU inter-industry network," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 76(306), pages 261-276.
    14. Mamada, Robert & Perrings, Charles, 2020. "The effect of emission charges on output and emissions in dynamic Cournot duopoly," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 370-380.
    15. Mariel Leal & Arturo García & Sang-Ho Lee, 2021. "Sequencing R&D decisions with a consumer-friendly firm and spillovers," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 243-260, April.
    16. Askar, S.S., 2022. "Nonlinear dynamic investigations and global analysis of a Cournot duopoly game with two different objectives," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Garcia, Arturo & Leal, Mariel & Lee, Sang-Ho & Park, Chul-Hi, 2024. "Merger incentive and strategic corporate social responsibility by a multiproduct corporation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 193-206.
    18. Ino, Hiroaki & Matsumura, Toshihiro, 2021. "Optimality of emission pricing policies based on emission intensity targets under imperfect competition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. De Vito, Antonio & Pancotto, Livia & Perdichizzi, Salvatore & Reghezza, Alessio, 2023. "Don’t go on holiday in August! Market reaction to an unexpected windfall tax on banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    20. Xiaoliang Li & Bo Li, 2023. "A Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products reconsidered," Papers 2301.01007, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Windfall tax; Market equilibrium; Cournot oligopoly; Bounded rationality; 0–1 test for chaos;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium
    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:137:y:2024:i:c:s0264999324001354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.