IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v88y2024ics0301420723011583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the effect of the UK oil and gas windfall tax on the economics of new fields in the UKCS province

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul-Salam, Yakubu

Abstract

Recent events in the global political economy have led to record high levels of oil and gas prices. In the UK, this has meant (1) a cost-of-living crisis; and (2) a significant increase in profits earned by companies in the upstream UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) sector. To help fund a cost-of-living support scheme for UK households, the UK Government recently introduced a windfall tax on upstream UKCS operations. There have been concerns however that the new tax would downgrade the value of UKCS assets hence diminishing the global competitiveness of the province. In this paper, I develop an optimisation model that fully incorporates all instruments of the new UK windfall taxation regime. The model is then applied to twelve wholly new UKCS fields currently under review by the UK Government for development approval. I show that whilst the new UK windfall tax reduces field economic value for all fields, the extent of the reduction is unlikely to cause premature abandonment of the fields. Consequently, the tax would not significantly injure the global competitiveness of the province. For the UK Government, the windfall tax would raise about $ 1.97 billion in tax revenues from the new fields in question. Finally, I derive the critical oil price levels that should trigger an accelerated phase out of the windfall tax in order to maintain the global competitiveness of the UKCS province should future oil prices slump.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul-Salam, Yakubu, 2024. "Examining the effect of the UK oil and gas windfall tax on the economics of new fields in the UKCS province," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011583
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723011583
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petter Osmundsen, Kjell Løvås, and Magne Emhjellen, 2022. "Investment Allocation with Capital Constraints. Comparison of Fiscal Regimes," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    2. Yakubu Abdul-Salam, 2022. "A Real Options Analysis of the Effects of Oil Price Uncertainty and Carbon Taxes on the Optimal Timing of Oil Field Decommissioning," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 6).
    3. Borge, Lars-Erik & Parmer, Pernille & Torvik, Ragnar, 2015. "Local natural resource curse?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 101-114.
    4. Nirupama L. Rao, 2018. "Taxes and US Oil Production: Evidence from California and the Windfall Profit Tax," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 268-301, November.
    5. Knoll, Michael S., 1987. "The crude oil windfall profit tax act of 1980 : An economic analysis of its effect on domestic crude oil production," Resources and Energy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 163-185, August.
    6. Alexeev, Michael & Zakharov, Nikita, 2022. "Who profits from windfalls in oil tax revenue? Inequality, protests, and the role of corruption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 472-492.
    7. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu, 2022. "An economic and policy case for development of the controversial Cambo field in the UK Continental Shelf," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2021. "Unlocking the economic viability of marginal UKCS discoveries: Optimising cluster developments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Abdo, Hafez, 2010. "The taxation of UK oil and gas production: Why the windfalls got away," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5625-5635, October.
    10. Brigida, Matthew, 2014. "The switching relationship between natural gas and crude oil prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 48-55.
    11. Andersen, Jørgen Juel & Sørensen, Rune Jørgen, 2022. "The zero-rent society: Evidence from hydropower and petroleum windfalls in Norwegian local governments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. repec:zbw:bofitp:2022_002 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2022. "Energy transition in the UKCS – Modelling the effects of carbon emission charges on upstream petroleum operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Sun, Xiaohua & Ren, Junlin & Wang, Yun, 2022. "The impact of resource taxation on resource curse: Evidence from Chinese resource tax policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Besfamille, Martín & Jorrat, Diego A. & Manzano, Osmel & Quiroga, Bernardo F. & Sanguinetti, Pablo, 2023. "How do subnational governments react to shocks to different revenue sources? Evidence from hydrocarbon-producing provinces in Argentina," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Camadan, Ercument & Erten, Ibrahim Etem & Zhang, Alex Hongliang, 2023. "Market failure or politics? Understanding the motives behind regulatory actions to address surging electricity prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Ahmed, Maruf Yakubu & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, 2021. "Counterfactual shock in energy commodities affects stock market dynamics: Evidence from the United States," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. De Vito, Antonio & Pancotto, Livia & Perdichizzi, Salvatore & Reghezza, Alessio, 2023. "Don’t go on holiday in August! Market reaction to an unexpected windfall tax on banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Mastroeni, Loretta & Mazzoccoli, Alessandro & Quaresima, Greta & Vellucci, Pierluigi, 2021. "Decoupling and recoupling in the crude oil price benchmarks: An investigation of similarity patterns," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Madina D. Sharapiyeva & Kunanbayeva Duissekul & Nurseiytova Gulmira & Kozhamkulova Zhanna, 2019. "Energy Efficiency of Transport and Logistics Infrastructure: The Example of the Republic of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 331-338.
    9. James Cust & Torfinn Harding & Pierre-Louis Vézina, 2019. "Dutch Disease Resistance: Evidence from Indonesian Firms," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(6), pages 1205-1237.
    10. Gao, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Yahui & Li, Lianqing & Hao, Yu, 2024. "Will resource tax reform raise green total factor productivity levels in cities? Evidence from 114 resource-based cities in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Frank Asche, Atle Oglend, and Petter Osmundsen, 2017. "Modeling UK Natural Gas Prices when Gas Prices Periodically Decouple from the Oil Price," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    12. Hendrik Schmitz & Reinhard Madlener, 2020. "Heterogeneity in price responsiveness for residential space heating in Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2255-2281, November.
    13. Franco Ruzzenenti, 2015. "Changes in the relationship between the financial and real sector and the present economic financial crisis: study of energy sector and market," Working papers wpaper105, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    14. Dionne, Georges & El Hraiki, Rayane & Mnasri, Mohamed, 2023. "Determinants and real effects of joint hedging: An empirical analysis of US oil and gas producers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Niyati Bhanja & Arif Billah Dar & Aviral Kumar Tiwari, 2018. "Do Global Crude Oil Markets Behave as One Great Pool? A Cyclical Analysis," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 14(2), pages 219-241, November.
    16. He, Xi, 2023. "Dams, cropland productivity, and economic development in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Chiappini, Raphaël & Jégourel, Yves & Raymond, Paul, 2019. "Towards a worldwide integrated market? New evidence on the dynamics of U.S., European and Asian natural gas prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 545-565.
    18. Halser, Christoph & Paraschiv, Florentina & Russo, Marianna, 2023. "Oil–gas price relationships on three continents: Disruptions and equilibria," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    19. Oleksandr Castello & Marina Resta, 2023. "A Machine-Learning-Based Approach for Natural Gas Futures Curve Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Maldonado, Stanislao, 2014. "The Non-Monotonic Political Effects of Resource Booms," MPRA Paper 85649, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Dec 2017.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UKCS; Oil; Gas; Windfall; Tax; Prices;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.