IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i3p445-451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing aftercare: Phase I: Consumer feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Trout, Alexandra L.
  • Epstein, Michael H.

Abstract

For many adolescents with disabilities the reintegration into the home and school settings following a stay in out-of-home care is fraught with difficulties. Although many return to environments that do not facilitate school success, few services and supports are available. As a result these youth are more likely to demonstrate poor homework completion, academic failure, and dropout prior to graduation. To date, no known empirically based intervention exists to address these risks and support these youth and their families during this critical reintegration period. This article reports the findings from Phase 1 in the development of an academic-based aftercare for adolescents reintegrating into the home and community school settings following a stay in out-of-home care. Data were collected from 31 youth, parents, and school professionals through 9 structured nominal group technique focus groups to determine factors that would contribute to participant buy-in and long-term participation. Common themes identified include the desire for program flexibility, 24-hour on-call support, and well trained, supportive staff. Service and training implications, study limitations, and future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Trout, Alexandra L. & Epstein, Michael H., 2010. "Developing aftercare: Phase I: Consumer feedback," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-451, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:445-451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(09)00309-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cook, Ronna J., 1994. "Are we helping foster care youth prepare for their future?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(3-4), pages 213-229.
    2. Miller, Keith A. & Fisher, Philip A. & Fetrow, Becky & Jordan, Kathy, 2006. "Trouble on the journey home: Reunification failures in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 260-274, March.
    3. Christopher Swann & Michelle Sylvester, 2006. "The foster care crisis: What caused caseloads to grow," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 43(2), pages 309-335, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huscroft-D'Angelo, Jacqueline & Trout, Alexandra L. & Henningsen, Christine & Synhorst, Lori & Lambert, Matthew & Patwardhan, Irina & Tyler, Patrick, 2019. "Legal professional perspectives on barriers and supports for school-aged students and families during reunification from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Autio, Minna & Lähteenmaa, Jaana & Holmberg, Ulrika & Kujala, Jukka, 2016. "Young consumer identity in a restrictive school environment — Addictive substances, symbolic goods and consumer skills," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 100-106.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stone, Susan, 2007. "Child maltreatment, out-of-home placement and academic vulnerability: A fifteen-year review of evidence and future directions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 139-161, February.
    2. Lindquist, Matthew J. & Santavirta, Torsten, 2014. "Does placing children in foster care increase their adult criminality?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 72-83.
    3. Maya Pendleton & Alan J. Dettlaff, 2024. "Policing Is Reproductive Oppression: How Policing and Carceral Systems Criminalize Parenting and Maintain Reproductive Oppression," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Christopher Wildeman, 2011. "Parental Incarceration, Child Homelessness, and the Invisible Consequences of Mass Imprisonment," Working Papers 1281, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    5. Stéphane Mechoulan, 2011. "The External Effects of Black Male Incarceration onBlack Females," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 1-35, January.
    6. Barth, Richard P. & Weigensberg, Elizabeth C. & Fisher, Philip A. & Fetrow, Becky & Green, Rebecca L., 2008. "Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 353-364, April.
    7. Sulimani-Aidan, Yafit, 2014. "Care leavers' challenges in transition to independent living," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 38-46.
    8. Yampolskaya, Svetlana & Callejas, Linda M., 2020. "The effect of child mental health service use on child safety and permanency in substance misusing families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Collins, Mary Elizabeth & Clay, Cassandra, 2009. "Influencing policy for youth transitioning from care: Defining problems, crafting solutions, and assessing politics," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 743-751, July.
    10. Zeira, Anat, 2009. "Alumni of educational residential settings in Israel: A cultural perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1074-1079, October.
    11. Hagleitner, Wolfgang & Sting, Stephan & Maran, Thomas, 2022. "Socio-economic status and living situation of care leavers in Austria," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    12. Christopher Wildeman & Kristin Turney, 2012. "Positive, Negative, or Null? The Effects of Maternal Incarceration on Children's Behavioral Problems," Working Papers 1440, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    13. Buehler, Cheryl & Orme, John G. & Post, James & Patterson, David A., 2000. "The long-term correlates of family foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 595-625, August.
    14. Kenny, Kathleen S. & Barrington, Clare, 2018. "“People just don't look at you the same way”: Public stigma, private suffering and unmet social support needs among mothers who use drugs in the aftermath of child removal," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 209-216.
    15. Charles Donkoh & Kristen Underhill & Paul Montgomery, 2006. "Independent Living Programmes for Improving Outcomes for Young People Leaving the Care System," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 1-34.
    16. Daining, Clara & DePanfilis, Diane, 2007. "Resilience of youth in transition from out-of-home care to adulthood," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1158-1178, September.
    17. Strayhorn, Terrell L., 2021. "Interrogating the collegiate experiences of African American males formerly in foster care: A critical qualitative analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Christopher Wildeman, 2014. "Parental Incarceration, Child Homelessness, and the Invisible Consequences of Mass Imprisonment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 651(1), pages 74-96, January.
    19. Christopher Wildeman, 2008. "Paternal Incarceration and Children's Aggressive Behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study," Working Papers 1014, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    20. Lindner, Abigail Rose & Hanlon, Ryan, 2024. "Outcomes of youth with foster care experiences based on permanency outcome – Adoption, aging out, long-term foster care, and reunification: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:445-451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.