IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v142y2022ics0190740922002675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A national review of child welfare competency models

Author

Listed:
  • McDonald, Chad
  • West, Kristen
  • Benson, Cole
  • Brittain, Charmaine

Abstract

Child welfare agencies across the United States aim to better the outcomes of children and families. As such, agencies often implement competency models outlining the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for a competent workforce, and that can guide their recruitment, hiring, training, and on-the-job performance. This article features a national review of available child welfare competency models, providing an overall state of the field, common shortcomings of competency models, and next steps to advance workforce development and evaluation. Researchers reviewed the competencies required to be a child welfare caseworker, the extent models covered core child welfare practice, and the differentiation of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Variability, confusion, and lack of clarity among competency models led researchers to conduct the study in two phases. Phase one serves to answer the original questions regarding the state of the field, while phase two asks questions derived from the knowledge gleaned from phase one. Phase two explores whether practice and competency models contain essential components identified as best practice and if the competency models explicitly reflect the practice models. This article primarily reports on phase two of the quantitative findings based on an analysis of practice models, competency models, and their various components. A discussion follows, highlighting possible reasons for the lack of clarity, model variability, and disconnect between practice and competency models. Lastly, the article provides study limitations and the next steps in competency development in the child welfare workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • McDonald, Chad & West, Kristen & Benson, Cole & Brittain, Charmaine, 2022. "A national review of child welfare competency models," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:142:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002675
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922002675
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana & Antle, Becky & Wandersman, Abraham & Cahn, Katharine, 2011. "Successful adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 622-633, May.
    2. Frey, Lauren & LeBeau, Mary & Kindler, Diane & Behan, Christopher & Morales, Isabel M. & Freundlich, Madelyn, 2012. "The pivotal role of child welfare supervisors in implementing an agency's practice model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1273-1282.
    3. Antle, Becky F. & Barbee, Anita P. & van Zyl, Michiel A., 2008. "A comprehensive model for child welfare training evaluation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1063-1080, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blome, Wendy Whiting & Steib, Sue D., 2014. "The organizational structure of child welfare: Staff are working hard, but it is hardly working," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 181-188.
    2. Lawrence, Catherine & Claiborne, Nancy & Zeitlin, Wendy & Auerbach, Charles, 2016. "Finish what you start: A study of Design Team change initiatives' impact on agency climate," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 40-46.
    3. Julien-Chinn, Francie J. & Lietz, Cynthia A., 2019. "Building learning cultures in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 360-365.
    4. Salveron, Mary & Bromfield, Leah & Kirika, Clara & Simmons, Jane & Murphy, Terry & Turnell, Andrew, 2015. "‘Changing the way we do child protection’: The implementation of Signs of Safety® within the Western Australia Department for Child Protection and Family Support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 126-139.
    5. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Antle, Becky F. & Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana N. & Sullivan, Dana J., 2009. "The prevention of child maltreatment recidivism through the Solution-Based Casework model of child welfare practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1346-1351, December.
    7. Liu, Junqing & Smith, Brenda D., 2011. "Transferring training to child welfare practice: Individual and collective efforts," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 149-156, January.
    8. Conners-Burrow, Nicola A. & Kramer, Teresa L. & Sigel, Benjamin A. & Helpenstill, Kathy & Sievers, Chad & McKelvey, Lorraine, 2013. "Trauma-informed care training in a child welfare system: Moving it to the front line," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1830-1835.
    9. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizo, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Munro, Emily & Forrester, Donald, 2019. "How do we assess the quality of group supervision? Developing a coding framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 515-524.
    10. Antle, Becky F. & Frey, Shannon E. & Sar, Bibhuti K. & Barbee, Anita P. & van Zyl, Michiel A., 2010. "Training the child welfare workforce in healthy couple relationships: An examination of attitudes and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 223-230, February.
    11. Leung, Patrick & Cheung, Monit, 2013. "Factor analyzing the “ASK” cultural competency self-assessment scale for child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1993-2002.
    12. Zinn, Andrew, 2015. "A typology of supervision in child welfare: Multilevel latent class and confirmatory analyses of caseworker–supervisor relationship type," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 98-110.
    13. Semanchin Jones, Annette & Logan-Greene, Patricia, 2016. "Understanding and responding to chronic neglect: A mixed methods case record examination," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 212-219.
    14. Ahn, Haksoon & Keyser, Daniel & Hayward-Everson, R. Anna, 2016. "A multi-level analysis of individual and agency effects on implementation of family-centered practice in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    15. Barbee, Anita P. & Antle, Becky & Langley, Cheri & Cunningham, Michael R. & Whiteside, Danielle & Sar, Bibhuti K. & Archuleta, Adrian & Karam, Eli & Borders, Kevin, 2021. "How to ensure fidelity in implementing an evidence based teen pregnancy prevention curriculum," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Sage, Melanie & Wells, Melissa & Sage, Todd & Devlin, Mary, 2017. "Supervisor and policy roles in social media use as a new technology in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-8.
    17. Keyser, Daniel & Harrington, Donna & Ahn, Haksoon, 2016. "A confirmatory factor analysis of the evidence-based practice attitudes scale in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 158-165.
    18. Packard, Thomas, 2017. "Tactics for successful organizational change in a youth and family services agency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 129-138.
    19. Jesse Chandler, "undated". "Technical Appendix: Considerations for Measuring T/TA Performance," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 4a1a00e145df4090b5e1f6e63, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Romano, Elisa & Stenason, Lauren & Weegar, Kelly & Cheung, Connie, 2020. "Improving child welfare’s use of data for service planning: Practitioner perspectives on a training curriculum," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:142:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922002675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.