IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v93y2016icp5-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying connected components in Gaussian finite mixture models for clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Scrucca, Luca

Abstract

Model-based clustering associates each component of a finite mixture distribution to a group or cluster. Therefore, an underlying implicit assumption is that a one-to-one correspondence exists between mixture components and clusters. In applications with multivariate continuous data, finite mixtures of Gaussian distributions are typically used. Information criteria, such as BIC, are often employed to select the number of mixture components. However, a single Gaussian density may not be sufficient, and two or more mixture components could be needed to reasonably approximate the distribution within a homogeneous group of observations. A clustering method, based on the identification of high density regions of the underlying density function, is introduced. Starting with an estimated Gaussian finite mixture model, the corresponding density estimate is used to identify the cluster cores, i.e. those data points which form the core of the clusters. Then, the remaining observations are allocated to those cluster cores for which the probability of cluster membership is the highest. The method is illustrated using both simulated and real data examples, which show how the proposed approach improves the identification of non-Gaussian clusters compared to a fully parametric approach. Furthermore, it enables the identification of clusters which cannot be obtained by merging mixture components, and it can be straightforwardly extended to cases of higher dimensionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Scrucca, Luca, 2016. "Identifying connected components in Gaussian finite mixture models for clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 5-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:93:y:2016:i:c:p:5-17
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947315000171
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
    2. Gilles Celeux & Gilda Soromenho, 1996. "An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 13(2), pages 195-212, September.
    3. Luca Scrucca, 2014. "Graphical tools for model-based mixture discriminant analysis," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(2), pages 147-165, June.
    4. Wang, Wan-Lun, 2015. "Mixtures of common t-factor analyzers for modeling high-dimensional data with missing values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 223-235.
    5. Raftery, Adrian E. & Dean, Nema, 2006. "Variable Selection for Model-Based Clustering," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 168-178, March.
    6. Surajit Ray & Bruce G. Lindsay, 2008. "Model selection in high dimensions: a quadratic‐risk‐based approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 95-118, February.
    7. Christian Hennig, 2010. "Methods for merging Gaussian mixture components," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 4(1), pages 3-34, April.
    8. Lin, Tsung-I, 2014. "Learning from incomplete data via parameterized t mixture models through eigenvalue decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 183-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Casa & Luca Scrucca & Giovanna Menardi, 2021. "Better than the best? Answers via model ensemble in density-based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(3), pages 599-623, September.
    2. Zhu, Xuwen & Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2018. "Manly transformation in finite mixture modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 190-208.
    3. José E. Chacón, 2020. "The Modal Age of Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 122-141, April.
    4. José E. Chacón, 2019. "Mixture model modal clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(2), pages 379-404, June.
    5. Abby Flynt & Nema Dean, 2019. "Growth Mixture Modeling with Measurement Selection," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(1), pages 3-25, April.
    6. Kunhui Zhang & Yen-Chi Chen, 2021. "Refined Mode-Clustering via the Gradient of Slope," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Warren C Jochem & Douglas R Leasure & Oliver Pannell & Heather R Chamberlain & Patricia Jones & Andrew J Tatem, 2021. "Classifying settlement types from multi-scale spatial patterns of building footprints," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1161-1179, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morris, Katherine & McNicholas, Paul D., 2016. "Clustering, classification, discriminant analysis, and dimension reduction via generalized hyperbolic mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 133-150.
    2. Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2016. "Model-based biclustering of clickstream data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 31-45.
    3. Wan-Lun Wang & Luis M. Castro & Yen-Ting Chang & Tsung-I Lin, 2019. "Mixtures of restricted skew-t factor analyzers with common factor loadings," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(2), pages 445-480, June.
    4. Redivo, Edoardo & Nguyen, Hien D. & Gupta, Mayetri, 2020. "Bayesian clustering of skewed and multimodal data using geometric skewed normal distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Jerzy Korzeniewski, 2016. "New Method Of Variable Selection For Binary Data Cluster Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 17(2), pages 295-304, June.
    6. Zhu, Xuwen & Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2018. "Manly transformation in finite mixture modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 190-208.
    7. Jeffrey Andrews & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "Variable Selection for Clustering and Classification," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(2), pages 136-153, July.
    8. Alessandro Casa & Andrea Cappozzo & Michael Fop, 2022. "Group-Wise Shrinkage Estimation in Penalized Model-Based Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 648-674, November.
    9. Wang, Ketong & Porter, Michael D., 2018. "Optimal Bayesian clustering using non-negative matrix factorization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 395-411.
    10. Semhar Michael & Volodymyr Melnykov, 2016. "An effective strategy for initializing the EM algorithm in finite mixture models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(4), pages 563-583, December.
    11. Hung Tong & Cristina Tortora, 2022. "Model-based clustering and outlier detection with missing data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(1), pages 5-30, March.
    12. Meng Li & Sijia Xiang & Weixin Yao, 2016. "Robust estimation of the number of components for mixtures of linear regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1539-1555, December.
    13. Marek Śmieja & Magdalena Wiercioch, 2017. "Constrained clustering with a complex cluster structure," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(3), pages 493-518, September.
    14. Luca Scrucca & Adrian Raftery, 2015. "Improved initialisation of model-based clustering using Gaussian hierarchical partitions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 9(4), pages 447-460, December.
    15. Hennig, Christian, 2008. "Dissolution point and isolation robustness: Robustness criteria for general cluster analysis methods," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(6), pages 1154-1176, July.
    16. Diani, Cecilia & Galimberti, Giuliano & Soffritti, Gabriele, 2022. "Multivariate cluster-weighted models based on seemingly unrelated linear regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Stefano Tonellato, 2019. "Bayesian nonparametric clustering as a community detection problem," Working Papers 2019: 20, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    18. Douglas Steinley & Michael Brusco, 2008. "Selection of Variables in Cluster Analysis: An Empirical Comparison of Eight Procedures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 125-144, March.
    19. McNicholas, P.D. & Murphy, T.B. & McDaid, A.F. & Frost, D., 2010. "Serial and parallel implementations of model-based clustering via parsimonious Gaussian mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 711-723, March.
    20. Andrea Cerasa, 2016. "Combining homogeneous groups of preclassified observations with application to international trade," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 70(3), pages 229-259, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:93:y:2016:i:c:p:5-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.