IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v93y2016icp5-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying connected components in Gaussian finite mixture models for clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Scrucca, Luca

Abstract

Model-based clustering associates each component of a finite mixture distribution to a group or cluster. Therefore, an underlying implicit assumption is that a one-to-one correspondence exists between mixture components and clusters. In applications with multivariate continuous data, finite mixtures of Gaussian distributions are typically used. Information criteria, such as BIC, are often employed to select the number of mixture components. However, a single Gaussian density may not be sufficient, and two or more mixture components could be needed to reasonably approximate the distribution within a homogeneous group of observations. A clustering method, based on the identification of high density regions of the underlying density function, is introduced. Starting with an estimated Gaussian finite mixture model, the corresponding density estimate is used to identify the cluster cores, i.e. those data points which form the core of the clusters. Then, the remaining observations are allocated to those cluster cores for which the probability of cluster membership is the highest. The method is illustrated using both simulated and real data examples, which show how the proposed approach improves the identification of non-Gaussian clusters compared to a fully parametric approach. Furthermore, it enables the identification of clusters which cannot be obtained by merging mixture components, and it can be straightforwardly extended to cases of higher dimensionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Scrucca, Luca, 2016. "Identifying connected components in Gaussian finite mixture models for clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 5-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:93:y:2016:i:c:p:5-17
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947315000171
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2015.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Celeux & Gilda Soromenho, 1996. "An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 13(2), pages 195-212, September.
    2. Luca Scrucca, 2014. "Graphical tools for model-based mixture discriminant analysis," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(2), pages 147-165, June.
    3. Surajit Ray & Bruce G. Lindsay, 2008. "Model selection in high dimensions: a quadratic‐risk‐based approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 95-118, February.
    4. Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
    5. Wang, Wan-Lun, 2015. "Mixtures of common t-factor analyzers for modeling high-dimensional data with missing values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 223-235.
    6. Raftery, Adrian E. & Dean, Nema, 2006. "Variable Selection for Model-Based Clustering," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 168-178, March.
    7. Christian Hennig, 2010. "Methods for merging Gaussian mixture components," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 4(1), pages 3-34, April.
    8. Lin, Tsung-I, 2014. "Learning from incomplete data via parameterized t mixture models through eigenvalue decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 183-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Xuwen & Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2018. "Manly transformation in finite mixture modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 190-208.
    2. José E. Chacón, 2019. "Mixture model modal clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(2), pages 379-404, June.
    3. Warren C Jochem & Douglas R Leasure & Oliver Pannell & Heather R Chamberlain & Patricia Jones & Andrew J Tatem, 2021. "Classifying settlement types from multi-scale spatial patterns of building footprints," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1161-1179, June.
    4. Alessandro Casa & Luca Scrucca & Giovanna Menardi, 2021. "Better than the best? Answers via model ensemble in density-based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(3), pages 599-623, September.
    5. José E. Chacón, 2020. "The Modal Age of Statistics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 122-141, April.
    6. Abby Flynt & Nema Dean, 2019. "Growth Mixture Modeling with Measurement Selection," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(1), pages 3-25, April.
    7. Kunhui Zhang & Yen-Chi Chen, 2021. "Refined Mode-Clustering via the Gradient of Slope," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2016. "Model-based biclustering of clickstream data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 31-45.
    2. Wan-Lun Wang & Luis M. Castro & Yen-Ting Chang & Tsung-I Lin, 2019. "Mixtures of restricted skew-t factor analyzers with common factor loadings," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(2), pages 445-480, June.
    3. Morris, Katherine & McNicholas, Paul D., 2016. "Clustering, classification, discriminant analysis, and dimension reduction via generalized hyperbolic mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 133-150.
    4. Redivo, Edoardo & Nguyen, Hien D. & Gupta, Mayetri, 2020. "Bayesian clustering of skewed and multimodal data using geometric skewed normal distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Zhu, Xuwen & Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2018. "Manly transformation in finite mixture modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 190-208.
    6. Jeffrey Andrews & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "Variable Selection for Clustering and Classification," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(2), pages 136-153, July.
    7. Semhar Michael & Volodymyr Melnykov, 2016. "An effective strategy for initializing the EM algorithm in finite mixture models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(4), pages 563-583, December.
    8. Hung Tong & Cristina Tortora, 2022. "Model-based clustering and outlier detection with missing data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(1), pages 5-30, March.
    9. Marek Śmieja & Magdalena Wiercioch, 2017. "Constrained clustering with a complex cluster structure," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(3), pages 493-518, September.
    10. Diani, Cecilia & Galimberti, Giuliano & Soffritti, Gabriele, 2022. "Multivariate cluster-weighted models based on seemingly unrelated linear regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Andrea Cerasa, 2016. "Combining homogeneous groups of preclassified observations with application to international trade," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 70(3), pages 229-259, August.
    12. Alessandro Casa & Luca Scrucca & Giovanna Menardi, 2021. "Better than the best? Answers via model ensemble in density-based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 15(3), pages 599-623, September.
    13. Dolnicar, Sara & Grün, Bettina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2016. "Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 992-999.
    14. Sahin, Özge & Czado, Claudia, 2022. "Vine copula mixture models and clustering for non-Gaussian data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 136-158.
    15. Wei, Yuhong & Tang, Yang & McNicholas, Paul D., 2019. "Mixtures of generalized hyperbolic distributions and mixtures of skew-t distributions for model-based clustering with incomplete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 18-41.
    16. Wang, Wan-Lun, 2015. "Mixtures of common t-factor analyzers for modeling high-dimensional data with missing values," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 223-235.
    17. Melnykov, Volodymyr, 2013. "On the distribution of posterior probabilities in finite mixture models with application in clustering," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 175-189.
    18. Pietro Coretto & Christian Hennig, 2016. "Robust Improper Maximum Likelihood: Tuning, Computation, and a Comparison With Other Methods for Robust Gaussian Clustering," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1648-1659, October.
    19. Jerzy Korzeniewski, 2016. "New Method Of Variable Selection For Binary Data Cluster Analysis," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 17(2), pages 295-304, June.
    20. Paul D. McNicholas, 2016. "Model-Based Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(3), pages 331-373, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:93:y:2016:i:c:p:5-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.