IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i8p2430-2441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost of using decomposable Gaussian graphical models for computational convenience

Author

Listed:
  • Fitch, A. Marie
  • Jones, Beatrix

Abstract

Graphical models are a powerful tool for describing patterns of conditional independence, and can also be used to regularize the covariance matrix. Vertices in the graph represent variables, and in the Gaussian setting, edges between vertices are equivalent to non-zero elements in the inverse covariance matrix. Models that can be represented as a decomposable (triangulated) graph are more computationally tractable; in fact, in the high-dimensional Bayesian setting it is common to restrict model selection procedures to decomposable models. We consider estimation of the covariance and inverse covariance matrix where the true model forms a cycle, but estimation is performed supposing that the pattern of zeros is a decomposable graphical model, where the elements restricted to zero are a subset of those in the true matrix. The variance of the maximum likelihood estimator based on the decomposable model is demonstrably larger than for the true non-decomposable model, and which decomposable model is selected affects the variance of particular elements of the matrix. When estimating the inverse covariance matrix the cost in terms of accuracy for using the decomposable model is fairly small, even when the difference in sparsity is large and the sample size is fairly small (e.g., the true model is a cycle of size 50, and the sample size is 51). However, when estimating the covariance matrix, the estimators for most elements had a dramatic increase in variance (200-fold in some cases) when a decomposable model was substituted. These increases become more pronounced as the difference in sparsity between models increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Fitch, A. Marie & Jones, Beatrix, 2012. "The cost of using decomposable Gaussian graphical models for computational convenience," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2430-2441.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:8:p:2430-2441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947312000400
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aliye Atay-Kayis & Helène Massam, 2005. "A Monte Carlo method for computing the marginal likelihood in nondecomposable Gaussian graphical models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(2), pages 317-335, June.
    2. Alberto Roverato, 2002. "Hyper Inverse Wishart Distribution for Non‐decomposable Graphs and its Application to Bayesian Inference for Gaussian Graphical Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 391-411, September.
    3. Frederick Wong, 2003. "Efficient estimation of covariance selection models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 809-830, December.
    4. Mathias Drton & Michael Eichler, 2006. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Gaussian Chain Graph Models under the Alternative Markov Property," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 33(2), pages 247-257, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carter, Christopher K. & Wong, Frederick & Kohn, Robert, 2011. "Constructing priors based on model size for nondecomposable Gaussian graphical models: A simulation based approach," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(5), pages 871-883, May.
    2. Donatello Telesca & Peter Müller & Steven M. Kornblau & Marc A. Suchard & Yuan Ji, 2012. "Modeling Protein Expression and Protein Signaling Pathways," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(500), pages 1372-1384, December.
    3. Helen Armstrong & Christopher K. Carter & Kevin K. F. Wong & Robert Kohn, 2007. "Bayesian Covariance Matrix Estimation using a Mixture of Decomposable Graphical Models," Discussion Papers 2007-13, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    4. Junghi Kim & Kim‐Anh Do & Min Jin Ha & Christine B. Peterson, 2019. "Bayesian inference of hub nodes across multiple networks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 172-182, March.
    5. Beatrice Franzolini & Alexandros Beskos & Maria De Iorio & Warrick Poklewski Koziell & Karolina Grzeszkiewicz, 2022. "Change point detection in dynamic Gaussian graphical models: the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the US stock market," Papers 2208.00952, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    6. Anindya Bhadra & Arvind Rao & Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, 2018. "Inferring network structure in non†normal and mixed discrete†continuous genomic data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 185-195, March.
    7. Giraud Christophe & Huet Sylvie & Verzelen Nicolas, 2012. "Graph Selection with GGMselect," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-52, February.
    8. MohammadAmin Fazli & Parsa Alian & Ali Owfi & Erfan Loghmani, 2021. "RPS: Portfolio Asset Selection using Graph based Representation Learning," Papers 2111.15634, arXiv.org.
    9. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Yamagata, Takashi, 2012. "Testing CAPM with a Large Number of Assets," IZA Discussion Papers 6469, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Arbia, Giuseppe & Bramante, Riccardo & Facchinetti, Silvia & Zappa, Diego, 2018. "Modeling inter-country spatial financial interactions with Graphical Lasso: An application to sovereign co-risk evaluation," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 72-79.
    11. Bo Cai & David B. Dunson, 2006. "Bayesian Covariance Selection in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 446-457, June.
    12. Manabu Asai & Michael McAleer & Jun Yu, 2006. "Multivariate Stochastic Volatility," Microeconomics Working Papers 22058, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    13. Christine Peterson & Francesco C. Stingo & Marina Vannucci, 2015. "Bayesian Inference of Multiple Gaussian Graphical Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 159-174, March.
    14. Peña Jose M., 2020. "Unifying Gaussian LWF and AMP Chain Graphs to Model Interference," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Tsionas, Mike, 2012. "Simple techniques for likelihood analysis of univariate and multivariate stable distributions: with extensions to multivariate stochastic volatility and dynamic factor models," MPRA Paper 40966, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Aug 2012.
    16. Dimitris Korobilis, 2013. "Var Forecasting Using Bayesian Variable Selection," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 204-230, March.
    17. Fan, Jianqing & Fan, Yingying & Lv, Jinchi, 2008. "High dimensional covariance matrix estimation using a factor model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 186-197, November.
    18. Laurenţiu Cătălin Hinoveanu & Fabrizio Leisen & Cristiano Villa, 2020. "A loss‐based prior for Gaussian graphical models," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 62(4), pages 444-466, December.
    19. David Chan & Robert Kohn & Chris Kirby, 2006. "Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models with Correlated Errors," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2-3), pages 245-274.
    20. M. Hashem Pesaran & Takashi Yamagata, 2017. "Testing for Alpha in Linear Factor Pricing Models with a Large Number of Securities," CESifo Working Paper Series 6432, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:8:p:2430-2441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.