IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v147y2020ics0167947320300323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General matching quantiles M-estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Qin, Shanshan
  • Wu, Yuehua

Abstract

Matching quantiles estimation (MQE) is a useful technique that allows one to find a linear combination of a set of random variables that matches the distribution of a target random variable. Since it is based on ordinary least-squares (OLS), it may be sensitive to outlier observations of the target random variable. A general matching quantiles M-estimation (MQME) method is thus proposed, which is resistant to outlier observations of the target random variable. Given that in most applications, the number of variables p may be large, a ‘sparse’ representation is highly desirable. The MQME is combined with the adaptive Lasso penalty so it can select informative variables. An iterative algorithm based on M-estimation is developed to compute MQME. The proposed matching quantiles M-estimate is consistent, just like the MQE. Extensive simulations are provided, in which efficient finite-sample performance of the new method is demonstrated. In addition, an illustrative real case study is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin, Shanshan & Wu, Yuehua, 2020. "General matching quantiles M-estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:147:y:2020:i:c:s0167947320300323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2020.106941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947320300323
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2020.106941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. repec:ulb:ulbeco:2013/136280 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Dominicy, Yves & Veredas, David, 2013. "The method of simulated quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 235-247.
    4. Cantoni E. & Ronchetti E., 2001. "Robust Inference for Generalized Linear Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1022-1030, September.
    5. Sgouropoulos, Nikolaos & Yao, Qiwei & Yastremiz, Claudia, 2015. "Matching a distribution by matching quantiles estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57221, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Roshan Srivastav & Andre Schardong & Slobodan Simonovic, 2014. "Equidistance Quantile Matching Method for Updating IDFCurves under Climate Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(9), pages 2539-2562, July.
    7. Jianqing Fan & Quefeng Li & Yuyan Wang, 2017. "Estimation of high dimensional mean regression in the absence of symmetry and light tail assumptions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 247-265, January.
    8. Nikolaos Sgouropoulos & Qiwei Yao & Claudia Yastremiz, 2015. "Matching a Distribution by Matching Quantiles Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 742-759, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Umberto Amato & Anestis Antoniadis & Italia De Feis & Irene Gijbels, 2021. "Penalised robust estimators for sparse and high-dimensional linear models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(1), pages 1-48, March.
    2. Xing, Li-Min & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2022. "Forecasting crude oil prices with shrinkage methods: Can nonconvex penalty and Huber loss help?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "High Dimensional Time Series Regression Models: Applications to Statistical Learning Methods," Papers 2308.16192, arXiv.org.
    4. Ana M. Bianco & Graciela Boente & Gonzalo Chebi, 2022. "Penalized robust estimators in sparse logistic regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 563-594, September.
    5. Jacobi, Arie & Tzur, Joseph, 2021. "Wealth Distribution across Countries: Quality of Weibull, Dagum and Burr XII in Estimating Wealth over Time," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    6. Ciuperca, Gabriela, 2021. "Variable selection in high-dimensional linear model with possibly asymmetric errors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    8. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    9. Xu, Yang & Zhao, Shishun & Hu, Tao & Sun, Jianguo, 2021. "Variable selection for generalized odds rate mixture cure models with interval-censored failure time data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Emmanouil Androulakis & Christos Koukouvinos & Kalliopi Mylona & Filia Vonta, 2010. "A real survival analysis application via variable selection methods for Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1399-1406.
    11. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Ying Huang & Shibasish Dasgupta, 2019. "Likelihood-Based Methods for Assessing Principal Surrogate Endpoints in Vaccine Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 504-523, December.
    13. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    14. Ni, Xiao & Zhang, Hao Helen & Zhang, Daowen, 2009. "Automatic model selection for partially linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 2100-2111, October.
    15. Avagyan, Vahe & Nogales, Francisco J., 2015. "D-trace Precision Matrix Estimation Using Adaptive Lasso Penalties," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 21775, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    16. Yanlin Tang & Xinyuan Song & Zhongyi Zhu, 2015. "Variable selection via composite quantile regression with dependent errors," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 69(1), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Gustavo Peralta, 2016. "The Nature of Volatility Spillovers across the International Capital Markets," CNMV Working Papers CNMV Working Papers no. 6, CNMV- Spanish Securities Markets Commission - Research and Statistics Department.
    18. Bakalli, Gaetan & Guerrier, Stéphane & Scaillet, Olivier, 2023. "A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    19. Peng, Heng & Lu, Ying, 2012. "Model selection in linear mixed effect models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 109-129.
    20. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:147:y:2020:i:c:s0167947320300323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.