IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v175y2023ip2s0960077923009694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmful strong agents and asymmetric interaction can promote the frequency of cooperation in the snowdrift game

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Minyu
  • Han, Songlin
  • Li, Qin
  • Wu, Juan
  • Kurths, Jürgen

Abstract

The emergence and mechanism of cooperation in social dilemmas have always been fundamental issues in evolutionary game theory. In this paper, we study the snowdrift game, in which individuals in a stronger position can gain additional benefits in cooperation with weaker individuals due to differences in status. Meanwhile, innocuous-type strong individuals will not harm their partners’ interests, while harmful-type ones will. In a mixed population, the strong individuals in these two asymmetric snowdrift games are more inclined to cooperate, but the weaker ones are more willing to choose defection. The average cooperation frequency is not lower than in symmetric populations. In structured populations, on the other hand, asymmetry promotes the formation of a configuration with a cooperator cluster with a core of strong cooperators, thereby promoting cooperation among individuals. However, only within a small range of parameters the frequency of cooperation will be slightly reduced. Harmful-type strong individuals can be more conducive to promoting cooperation than innocuous-type ones in some cases. The existence of harmful and strong individuals in the snowdrift game further helps to solve the social loafing effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Minyu & Han, Songlin & Li, Qin & Wu, Juan & Kurths, Jürgen, 2023. "Harmful strong agents and asymmetric interaction can promote the frequency of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p2:s0960077923009694
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923009694
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szolnoki, Attila & Perc, Matjaž & Danku, Zsuzsa, 2008. "Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner’s dilemma game on scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(8), pages 2075-2082.
    2. Avila, Piret & Mullon, Charles, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Theory and the Adaptive Dynamics Approach: Adaptation where Individuals Interact," IAST Working Papers 23-150, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    3. Fishman, Michael A., 2008. "Asymmetric evolutionary games with non-linear pure strategy payoffs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 77-90, May.
    4. Liu, Xuesong & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng & Liu, Aizhi, 2019. "Promotion of cooperation in evolutionary game dynamics under asymmetric information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 258-266.
    5. Liu, Chen & Shi, Juan & Li, Tong & Liu, Jinzhuo, 2019. "Aspiration driven coevolution resolves social dilemmas in networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 247-254.
    6. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    7. Deng, Xinyang & Zhang, Zhipeng & Deng, Yong & Liu, Qi & Chang, Shuhua, 2016. "Self-adaptive win-stay-lose-shift reference selection mechanism promotes cooperation on a square lattice," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 322-331.
    8. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    9. Alex McAvoy & Christoph Hauert, 2015. "Asymmetric Evolutionary Games," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Oliver P. Hauser & David G. Rand & Alexander Peysakhovich & Martin A. Nowak, 2014. "Cooperating with the future," Nature, Nature, vol. 511(7508), pages 220-223, July.
    11. Han, Jia-Xu & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2023. "Complex interactions promote the frequency of cooperation in snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    12. Du, Wen-Bo & Cao, Xian-Bin & Hu, Mao-Bin, 2009. "The effect of asymmetric payoff mechanism on evolutionary networked prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(24), pages 5005-5012.
    13. Li, Xiaoyu & Jia, Danyang & Niu, Xiaotong & Liu, Chen & Zhu, Peican & Liu, Dujuan & Chu, Chen, 2022. "Ability-based asymmetrical fitness calculation promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    14. Piret Avila & Charles Mullon, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Theory and the Adaptive Dynamics Approach: Adaptation where Individuals Interact," Post-Print hal-04067694, HAL.
    15. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2023. "Restoring spatial cooperation with myopic agents in a three-strategy social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 458(C).
    16. Zhu, Wenqiang & Pan, Qiuhui & Song, Sha & He, Mingfeng, 2023. "Effects of exposure-based reward and punishment on the evolution of cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2022. "Mercenary punishment in structured populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Kehuan & Han, Songlin & Feng, Minyu & Szolnoki, Attila, 2024. "An evolutionary game with reputation-based imitation-mutation dynamics," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    2. He, Jialu & Cui, Lei, 2024. "The persistence-based game transition resolves the social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Zhonglin & Xu, Yan & Zhang, Hui & Yu, Guihai, 2024. "Asymmetrical interactions driven by strategic persistence effectively alleviate social dilemmas," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Liming Zhang & Ming Cai & Yingxin Zhang & Shuai Wang & Yao Xiao, 2024. "Two-layer network evolutionary game model applied to complex systems," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    5. Jin, Jiahua & Shen, Chen & Chu, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Incorporating dominant environment into individual fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoners' dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 70-75.
    6. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & He, Jialu, 2022. "Inequal dependence on members stabilizes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    7. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu & Chen, Wei & Dai, Wenhui, 2024. "Evolution of cooperation under corrupt institutions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Qian, Jia-Li & Zhou, Yin-Xiang & Hao, Qing-Yi, 2024. "The emergence of cooperative behavior based on random payoff and heterogeneity of concerning social image," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Yongkui Liu & Xiaojie Chen & Lin Zhang & Long Wang & Matjaž Perc, 2012. "Win-Stay-Lose-Learn Promotes Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    10. Qi Su & Lei Zhou & Long Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary multiplayer games on graphs with edge diversity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Su, Qi & Li, Aming & Wang, Long, 2017. "Spatial structure favors cooperative behavior in the snowdrift game with multiple interactive dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 299-306.
    12. Flávio L Pinheiro & Jorge M Pacheco & Francisco C Santos, 2012. "From Local to Global Dilemmas in Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    13. Ye, Ye & Hang, Xiao Rong & Koh, Jin Ming & Miszczak, Jarosław Adam & Cheong, Kang Hao & Xie, Neng-gang, 2020. "Passive network evolution promotes group welfare in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    14. Yanlong Zhang, 2015. "Partially and Wholly Overlapping Networks: The Evolutionary Dynamics of Social Dilemmas on Social Networks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Feng, Kehuan & Han, Songlin & Feng, Minyu & Szolnoki, Attila, 2024. "An evolutionary game with reputation-based imitation-mutation dynamics," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    16. Wes Maciejewski & Feng Fu & Christoph Hauert, 2014. "Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Populations with Heterogenous Structures," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Ye, Ye & Xie, Neng-gang & Wang, Lu & Cen, Yu-wan, 2013. "The multi-agent Parrondo’s model based on the network evolution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(21), pages 5414-5421.
    18. Huang, Yi Jie & Deng, Zheng Hong & Song, Qun & Wu, Tao & Deng, Zhi Long & Gao, Ming yu, 2019. "The evolution of cooperation in multi-games with aspiration-driven updating rule," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 313-317.
    19. Kokubo, Satoshi & Wang, Zhen & Tanimoto, Jun, 2015. "Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 552-568.
    20. Fengjie Xie & Jing Shi & Jun Lin, 2017. "Impact of interaction style and degree on the evolution of cooperation on Barabási–Albert scale-free network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p2:s0960077923009694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.