IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v372y2020ics009630031930952x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Lv, Shaojie
  • Wang, Xianjia

Abstract

Public goods game as a multi-player social dilemma game plays an important role in studying the emergence of cooperation, which remains an open question. This paper studies the impact of heterogeneous investments on cooperative behavior in public goods game, where players adopting exclusion strategy can exclude defectors from the group. Our research shows that the heterogeneous investment mechanism can significantly promote cooperation. When the cost of exclusion is low, the excluders can obtain higher payoff than other players, which leads that cooperators and excluders coexist and dominate the population. As the cost of exclusion increases, the advantage of excluders weakens and population keeps high cooperation level in some regions of contribution rate ω. For low or middle values of r, the too small or relatively large values of ω will be not beneficial to the evolution of cooperation. For high values of r, a small increase in ω will be beneficial to the evolution of cooperation. This paper provides a new understanding of cooperation under heterogeneous investment mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:372:y:2020:i:c:s009630031930952x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.124960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009630031930952X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szolnoki, Attila & Perc, Matjaž & Danku, Zsuzsa, 2008. "Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner’s dilemma game on scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(8), pages 2075-2082.
    2. Gao, Jia & Li, Zhi & Wu, Te & Wang, Long, 2010. "Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(16), pages 3166-3171.
    3. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6685), pages 573-577, June.
    4. M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity," Working Papers ir98040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    5. Tanimoto, Jun, 2017. "Coevolution of discrete, mixed, and continuous strategy systems boosts in the spatial prisoner's dilemma and chicken games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 304(C), pages 20-27.
    6. Francisco C. Santos & Marta D. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco, 2008. "Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7201), pages 213-216, July.
    7. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 2005. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7063), pages 1291-1298, October.
    8. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    9. Wu-Jie Yuan & Cheng-Yi Xia, 2014. "Role of Investment Heterogeneity in the Cooperation on Spatial Public Goods Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    10. Kokubo, Satoshi & Wang, Zhen & Tanimoto, Jun, 2015. "Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 552-568.
    11. Tu, Jing, 2018. "Contribution inequality in the spatial public goods game: Should the rich contribute more?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 9-14.
    12. Andrew M. Colman, 2006. "The puzzle of cooperation," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7085), pages 744-745, April.
    13. Wang, Qun & Wang, Hanchen & Zhang, Zhuxi & Li, Yumeng & Liu, Yu & Perc, Matjaž, 2018. "Heterogeneous investments promote cooperation in evolutionary public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 570-575.
    14. Kishimoto, Noriyuki & Kokubo, Satoshi & Tanimoto, Jun, 2013. "Combination of continuous and binary strategies enhances network reciprocity in a spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 83-90.
    15. Chen, Ya-Shan & Yang, Han-Xin & Guo, Wen-Zhong & Liu, Geng-Geng, 2018. "Promotion of cooperation based on swarm intelligence in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 614-620.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Xiaojian & Quan, Ji & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Effect of reputation-based heterogeneous investment on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tu, Jing, 2018. "Contribution inequality in the spatial public goods game: Should the rich contribute more?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 9-14.
    2. Ma, Xiaojian & Quan, Ji & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Effect of reputation-based heterogeneous investment on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Du, Faqi & Fu, Feng, 2013. "Quantifying the impact of noise on macroscopic organization of cooperation in spatial games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 35-44.
    4. Dong, Yukun & Xu, Hedong & Fan, Suohai, 2019. "Memory-based stag hunt game on regular lattices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 519(C), pages 247-255.
    5. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    6. Su, Qi & Li, Aming & Wang, Long, 2017. "Spatial structure favors cooperative behavior in the snowdrift game with multiple interactive dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 299-306.
    7. Chen, Wei & Wu, Te & Li, Zhiwu & Wang, Long, 2016. "Friendship-based partner switching promotes cooperation in heterogeneous populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 192-199.
    8. Jorge M Pacheco & Flávio L Pinheiro & Francisco C Santos, 2009. "Population Structure Induces a Symmetry Breaking Favoring the Emergence of Cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Bandyopadhyay, Abhirup & Kar, Samarjit, 2018. "Coevolution of cooperation and network structure in social dilemmas in evolutionary dynamic complex network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 710-730.
    11. Swami Iyer & Timothy Killingback, 2020. "Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, September.
    12. Faqi Du & Feng Fu, 2011. "Partner Selection Shapes the Strategic and Topological Evolution of Cooperation," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 354-369, September.
    13. Xiaojie Chen & Alana Schick & Michael Doebeli & Alistair Blachford & Long Wang, 2012. "Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
    14. Yao Meng & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Aming Li, 2024. "Dynamics of collective cooperation under personalised strategy updates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Huang, Yongchao & Wan, Siyi & Zheng, Junjun & Liu, Wenyi, 2023. "Evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game with interactive diversity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).
    16. Zhang, Lan & Xie, Yuan & Huang, Changwei & Li, Haihong & Dai, Qionglin, 2020. "Heterogeneous investments induced by historical payoffs promote cooperation in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Wang, Xiaofeng & Chen, Xiaojie & Gao, Jia & Wang, Long, 2013. "Reputation-based mutual selection rule promotes cooperation in spatial threshold public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 181-187.
    18. Liang, Rizhou & Zhang, Jiqiang & Zheng, Guozhong & Chen, Li, 2021. "Social hierarchy promotes the cooperation prevalence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    19. Lv, Shaojie & Song, Feifei, 2022. "Particle swarm intelligence and the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game with punishment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    20. Jin, Jiahua & Shen, Chen & Chu, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2017. "Incorporating dominant environment into individual fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoners' dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 70-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:372:y:2020:i:c:s009630031930952x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.