IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v609y2023ics037843712200944x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complex interactions promote the frequency of cooperation in snowdrift game

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Jia-Xu
  • Wang, Rui-Wu

Abstract

The emergence and maintains of cooperation in social dilemmas is one of the most popular problem in evolutionary game theory. In this paper, we consider the influence of complex interactions in evolutionary game theory. We consider a situation that some individuals may get additional benefits in snowdrift game without the detriment of the co-player because of difference in status, like good reputation of assisting the weak. We find that the replicator dynamics of asymmetric snowdrift game have one boundary stable equilibrium, which is affected by the asymmetry of the interaction and the proportion of strong individuals. The stable equilibrium shows that strong individuals are willing to choose cooperation and weak individuals are willing to choose defection. In this case, the average frequency of cooperation is not less than the equilibrium frequency of cooperators with only symmetric interactions. In addition, complex interactions in spatially organized populations causes weak individuals to mimic the strategies of strong neighbors. Strong individuals with great benefit are willing to choose cooperation, and cooperators create a cluster with a core of strong cooperators and weak cooperators outside. For a wide range of parameters, the frequency of cooperation among weak individuals grows dramatically. Complex interactions frequently improves the frequency of cooperation while decreasing the frequency of cooperation slightly only over a narrow range of parameter. Because of the high frequency of cooperation, complex interactions can roughly solve the paradox in the snowdrift game.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Jia-Xu & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2023. "Complex interactions promote the frequency of cooperation in snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:609:y:2023:i:c:s037843712200944x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.128386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843712200944X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Shi & Ivan Romić & Yongjuan Ma & Zhen Wang & Boris Podobnik & H. Eugene Stanley & Petter Holme & Marko Jusup, 2020. "Freedom of choice adds value to public goods," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(30), pages 17516-17521, July.
    2. Alex McAvoy & Christoph Hauert, 2015. "Asymmetric Evolutionary Games," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Ádám Kun & Ulf Dieckmann, 2013. "Resource heterogeneity can facilitate cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:30-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. E. Toby Kiers & Robert A. Rousseau & Stuart A. West & R. Ford Denison, 2003. "Host sanctions and the legume–rhizobium mutualism," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6953), pages 78-81, September.
    6. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    7. Martin A. Nowak & Corina E. Tarnita & Edward O. Wilson, 2010. "The evolution of eusociality," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7310), pages 1057-1062, August.
    8. Benjamin Kerr & Margaret A. Riley & Marcus W. Feldman & Brendan J. M. Bohannan, 2002. "Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6894), pages 171-174, July.
    9. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    10. Peter D. Taylor & Troy Day & Geoff Wild, 2007. "Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7143), pages 469-472, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Zhen-Wei & Zhang, Ji-Qiang & Zheng, Guo-Zhong & Cai, Wei-Ran & Cai, Chao-Ran & Chen, Li & Wang, Xu-Ming, 2024. "Emergence of anti-coordinated patterns in snowdrift game by reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Feng, Minyu & Han, Songlin & Li, Qin & Wu, Juan & Kurths, Jürgen, 2023. "Harmful strong agents and asymmetric interaction can promote the frequency of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P2).
    3. Zhang, Qianwei & Tang, Rui & Lu, Yilun & Wang, Xinyu, 2024. "The impact of anxiety on cooperative behavior: A network evolutionary game theory approach," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    4. Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Zhipeng & Liu, Yanli & Chen, Guici, 2023. "A reinforcement learning-based strategy updating model for the cooperative evolution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    5. He, Jialu & Cui, Lei, 2024. "The persistence-based game transition resolves the social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Su & Lei Zhou & Long Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary multiplayer games on graphs with edge diversity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Alex McAvoy & Christoph Hauert, 2015. "Asymmetric Evolutionary Games," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Michael Foley & Rory Smead & Patrick Forber & Christoph Riedl, 2021. "Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Benjamin Allen & Christine Sample & Robert Jencks & James Withers & Patricia Steinhagen & Lori Brizuela & Joshua Kolodny & Darren Parke & Gabor Lippner & Yulia A Dementieva, 2020. "Transient amplifiers of selection and reducers of fixation for death-Birth updating on graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Gao, Lei & Li, Yaotang & Wang, Zhen & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2022. "Asymmetric strategy setup solve the Prisoner’s Dilemma of the evolution of mutualism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    7. Sabin Lessard, 2011. "Effective Game Matrix and Inclusive Payoff in Group-Structured Populations," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 301-318, June.
    8. Liu, Xuesong & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng & Liu, Aizhi, 2019. "Promotion of cooperation in evolutionary game dynamics under asymmetric information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 258-266.
    9. Sakiyama, Tomoko, 2021. "A power law network in an evolutionary hawk–dove game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Flávio L Pinheiro & Jorge M Pacheco & Francisco C Santos, 2012. "From Local to Global Dilemmas in Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    11. Charles G Nathanson & Corina E Tarnita & Martin A Nowak, 2009. "Calculating Evolutionary Dynamics in Structured Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Dhaker Kroumi, 2021. "Aspiration Can Promote Cooperation in Well-Mixed Populations As in Regular Graphs," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 390-417, June.
    13. Zhang, Xin-Jie & Tang, Yong & Xiong, Jason & Wang, Wei-Jia & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2020. "Ranking game on networks: The evolution of hierarchical society," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    14. Du, Faqi & Fu, Feng, 2013. "Quantifying the impact of noise on macroscopic organization of cooperation in spatial games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 35-44.
    15. Zhang, Hui & Zhang, Feng & Li, Zizhen & Gao, Meng & Li, Wenlong, 2009. "Evolutionary diversity and spatiotemporal dynamics of a spatial game," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2353-2364.
    16. David V McLeod & Troy Day, 2019. "Social evolution under demographic stochasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Dhaker Kroumi & Sabin Lessard, 2015. "Conditions for Cooperation to be More Abundant than Defection in a Hierarchically Structured Population," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 239-262, June.
    18. Liang, Rizhou & Zhang, Jiqiang & Zheng, Guozhong & Chen, Li, 2021. "Social hierarchy promotes the cooperation prevalence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    19. Aslihan Akdeniz & Matthijs van Veelen, 2019. "The cancellation effect at the group level," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-073/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Zhao, Zhengwu & Zhang, Chunyan, 2023. "The mechanisms of labor division from the perspective of task urgency and game theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:609:y:2023:i:c:s037843712200944x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.