IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v175y2023ip1s0960077923009128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multistability and bifurcation analysis for a three-strategy game system with public goods feedback and discrete delays

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Haihui
  • Meng, Xinzhu
  • Hayat, Tasawar
  • Hobiny, Aatef

Abstract

The interaction between evolution and public goods exists in social and biological systems. Exploring mathematical models that combine evolution and public goods facilitates insights and discoveries about the evolution of cooperation. We propose a third strategy called the encouragement strategy, which can reward and punish, and bear the related costs, in addition to the classical cooperation and defection strategies. We incorporate strategy and public goods dynamics to formulate a high-dimensional and high-order three-strategy evolutionary game system with public goods feedback. For this non-delayed system, we evaluate the existence of equilibria and the conditions for the occurrence of transcritical and Hopf bifurcations. Interestingly, the non-delayed system exhibits multiple multistability due to different payoffs and initial conditions. The results suggest that the environment with rich public goods is suitable for cooperators to survive. Surprisingly, raising reward does not always promote the survival of cooperators. Cooperators prevail in environments with moderate reward and severe punishment. Further, we develop a delayed system by considering information delay and production delay. For the delayed system, we investigate the properties of Hopf bifurcation, including existence, direction and stability. We find that small delays do not affect the evolutionary outcome of the strategies. However, delays larger than the critical value lead to periodic oscillations of the strategies, in which case the cooperators still have a dominant advantage. Unfortunately, larger delays can cause the disappearance of cooperators. Theoretical and numerical results show that public goods feedback, reward, punishment, payoffs, initial conditions, and delays are all significant factors in determining the outcome of strategic evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Haihui & Meng, Xinzhu & Hayat, Tasawar & Hobiny, Aatef, 2023. "Multistability and bifurcation analysis for a three-strategy game system with public goods feedback and discrete delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p1:s0960077923009128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923009128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry Samuelson, 2016. "Game Theory in Economics and Beyond," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 107-130, Fall.
    2. Krawiec, Adam & Szydłowski, Marek, 2017. "Economic growth cycles driven by investment delay," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 175-183.
    3. D. Joseph Sexton & Martin Schuster, 2017. "Nutrient limitation determines the fitness of cheaters in bacterial siderophore cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Hommes, Cars H. & Ochea, Marius I., 2012. "Multiple equilibria and limit cycles in evolutionary games with Logit Dynamics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 434-441.
    5. Andrew R. Tilman & Joshua B. Plotkin & Erol Akçay, 2020. "Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Duan, Daifeng & Niu, Ben & Wei, Junjie, 2019. "Hopf-Hopf bifurcation and chaotic attractors in a delayed diffusive predator-prey model with fear effect," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 206-216.
    7. Dixit, Avinash & Olson, Mancur, 2000. "Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase Theorem?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 309-335, June.
    8. R. Craig MacLean & Ivana Gudelj, 2006. "Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 498-501, May.
    9. Stefan Meyer & Paulo Santos & Fue Yang, 2021. "Economic games can be used to promote cooperation in the field," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(47), pages 2026046118-, November.
    10. Rabin, Matthew, 1993. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1281-1302, December.
    11. Zhenhua Pei & Baokui Wang & Jinming Du, 2016. "Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Papers 1611.01531, arXiv.org.
    12. Chen, Qin & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "The influence of quasi-cooperative strategy on social dilemma evolution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yifei & Meng, Xinzhu & Alzahrani, Abdullah Khames, 2024. "Stability, period and chaos of the evolutionary game strategy induced by time-delay and mutation feedback," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Tianjun Su & Linhai Wu & Jingxiang Zhang, 2024. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Food Safety Regulation under Time Delay Effect," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daske, Thomas, 2019. "Efficient Incentives in Social Networks: "Gamification" and the Coase Theorem," EconStor Preprints 193148, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Cason, Timothy N. & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi & Yamato, Takehiko & Yokotani, Konomu, 2004. "Non-excludable public good experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 81-102, October.
    3. Patel, Amrish & Smith, Alec, 2019. "Guilt and participation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 279-295.
    4. Tatsuyoshi Saijo & Takehiko Yamato & Konomu Yokotani, 2003. "Non-Excludable Public Good Experiments revised October 2003, forthcoming in Games and Economic Behavior," Discussion papers 03011, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Katinka Pantzy & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2006. "Cooperative Networks: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2005-32, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    6. Tian-Jiao Feng & Jie Mei & Rui-Wu Wang & Sabin Lessard & Yi Tao & Xiu-Deng Zheng, 2022. "Noise-Induced Quasi-Heteroclinic Cycle in a Rock–Paper–Scissors Game with Random Payoffs," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1280-1292, December.
    7. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    8. Ellingsen, Tore & Johannesson, Magnus, 2009. "Time is not money," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 96-102, October.
    9. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    10. Thomas Dohmen & Armin Falk & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2009. "Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(536), pages 592-612, March.
    11. Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2019. "The many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1025-1069.
    12. Vollmer Uwe, 2004. "Streissler, E.W. (Hrsg.), Studien zur Entwicklung der ökonomischen Theorie XIX," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 224(6), pages 758-759, December.
    13. Emin Karagözoğlu & Elif Tosun, 2022. "Endogenous Game Choice and Giving Behavior in Distribution Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Astrid Dannenberg & Carlo Gallier, 2020. "The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: a survey of experimental research," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(3), pages 716-749, September.
    15. Na Li Dawson & Kathleen Segerson, 2008. "Voluntary Agreements with Industries: Participation Incentives with Industry-Wide Targets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(1), pages 97-114.
    16. Maida, Agata & Pezone, Vincenzo, 2024. "CEO Pay Disclosure and Within-Firm Wage Inequality," IZA Discussion Papers 17243, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Dufwenberg, Martin & Patel, Amrish, 2019. "Introduction to special issue on psychological game theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 181-184.
    18. Alpízar, Francisco & Martinsson, Peter, 2010. "Don’t Tell Me What to Do, Tell Me Who to Follow! - Field Experiment Evidence on Voluntary Donations," Working Papers in Economics 452, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    19. Andreas Löschel & Dirk Rübbelke, 2014. "On the Voluntary Provision of International Public Goods," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(322), pages 195-204, April.
    20. Hoffmann, Magnus & Kolmar, Martin, 2017. "Distributional preferences in probabilistic and share contests," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 120-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p1:s0960077923009128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.