IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/beexfi/v33y2022ics2214635021001386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heroes, just for one day: The impact of Donald Trump’s tweets on stock prices

Author

Listed:
  • Machus, Tobias
  • Mestel, Roland
  • Theissen, Erik

Abstract

We analyze the effect of Donald Trump’s tweets on individual stock returns. We use intraday (minute-by-minute) data in order to uncover causal effects of the tweets on prices and trading activity. We find that the tweets cause increased trading activity but do not have lasting effects on stock prices. We also find evidence of abnormal returns, increased trading volume and increased investor attention before the tweets. This finding is consistent with Donald Trump’s tweets not providing new information but rather being comments on events that happened, and already attracted investor attention, before the tweet.

Suggested Citation

  • Machus, Tobias & Mestel, Roland & Theissen, Erik, 2022. "Heroes, just for one day: The impact of Donald Trump’s tweets on stock prices," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:33:y:2022:i:c:s2214635021001386
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635021001386
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timm O. Sprenger & Andranik Tumasjan & Philipp G. Sandner & Isabell M. Welpe, 2014. "Tweets and Trades: the Information Content of Stock Microblogs," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 20(5), pages 926-957, November.
    2. Tobias Burggraf & Ralf Fendel & Toan Luu Duc Huynh, 2020. "Political news and stock prices: evidence from Trump’s trade war," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(18), pages 1485-1488, October.
    3. Born, Jeffery A. & Myers, David H. & Clark, William J., 2017. "Trump tweets and the efficient Market Hypothesis," Algorithmic Finance, IOS Press, vol. 6(3-4), pages 103-109.
    4. Gholampour, Vahid, 2019. "Daily expectations of returns index," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 236-252.
    5. Ahmad H. Juma’h & Yazan Alnsour, 2018. "Using Social Media Analytics: The Effect of President Trump’s Tweets On Companies’ Performance," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 100-121, March.
    6. Markum Reed, 2016. "A Study of Social Network Effects on the Stock Market," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 342-351, October.
    7. Steve Y. Yang & Sheung Yin Kevin Mo & Anqi Liu, 2015. "Twitter financial community sentiment and its predictive relationship to stock market movement," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(10), pages 1637-1656, October.
    8. Timm O. Sprenger & Philipp G. Sandner & Andranik Tumasjan & Isabell M. Welpe, 2014. "News or Noise? Using Twitter to Identify and Understand Company-specific News Flow," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7-8), pages 791-830, September.
    9. Broadstock, David C. & Zhang, Dayong, 2019. "Social-media and intraday stock returns: The pricing power of sentiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 116-123.
    10. Saurabh, Samant & Dey, Kushankur, 2020. "Unraveling the relationship between social moods and the stock market: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    11. Qi Ge & Alexander Kurov & Marketa Halova Wolfe, 2019. "Do Investors Care About Presidential Company‐Specific Tweets?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 213-242, July.
    12. Corrado, Charles J., 1989. "A nonparametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event studies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 385-395, August.
    13. Peter Tillmann, 2020. "Trump, Twitter, And Treasuries," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(3), pages 403-408, July.
    14. Kinyua, Johnson D. & Mutigwe, Charles & Cushing, Daniel J. & Poggi, Michael, 2021. "An analysis of the impact of President Trump’s tweets on the DJIA and S&P 500 using machine learning and sentiment analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    15. Boehmer, Ekkehart & Masumeci, Jim & Poulsen, Annette B., 1991. "Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 253-272, December.
    16. Klaus, Jürgen & Koser, Christoph, 2021. "Measuring Trump: The Volfefe Index and its impact on European financial markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dragomirescu-Gaina, Catalin & Philippas, Dionisis & Goutte, Stéphane, 2023. "How to ‘Trump’ the energy market: Evidence from the WTI-Brent spread," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yusaku Nishimura & Xuyi Dong & Bianxia Sun, 2021. "Trump's tweets: Sentiment, stock market volatility, and jumps," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 44(3), pages 497-512, September.
    2. Gabriele Ranco & Darko Aleksovski & Guido Caldarelli & Miha Grčar & Igor Mozetič, 2015. "The Effects of Twitter Sentiment on Stock Price Returns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Nishimura, Yusaku & Sun, Bianxia, 2021. "President’s Tweets, US-China economic conflict and stock market Volatility: Evidence from China and G5 countries," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Heleen Brans & Bert Scholtens, 2020. "Under his thumb the effect of president Donald Trump’s Twitter messages on the US stock market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Rui Fan & Oleksandr Talavera & Vu Tran, 2020. "Social media bots and stock markets," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(3), pages 753-777, June.
    6. Daniele Ballinari & Simon Behrendt, 2021. "How to gauge investor behavior? A comparison of online investor sentiment measures," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 169-204, June.
    7. Marinč, Matej & Massoud, Nadia & Ichev, Riste & Valentinčič, Aljoša, 2021. "Presidential candidates linguistic tone: The impact on the financial markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Abdi, Farshid & Kormanyos, Emily & Pelizzon, Loriana & Getmansky, Mila & Simon, Zorka, 2021. "Market impact of government communication: The case of presidential tweets," SAFE Working Paper Series 314, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2021.
    9. Zachary McGurk & Adam Nowak & Joshua C. Hall, 2020. "Stock returns and investor sentiment: textual analysis and social media," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 44(3), pages 458-485, July.
    10. Saurabh, Samant & Dey, Kushankur, 2020. "Unraveling the relationship between social moods and the stock market: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    11. Zeitun, Rami & Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Ahmad, Nasir & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "The impact of Twitter-based sentiment on US sectoral returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Afanasyev, Dmitriy O. & Fedorova, Elena & Ledyaeva, Svetlana, 2021. "Strength of words: Donald Trump's tweets, sanctions and Russia's ruble," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 253-277.
    13. Behrendt, Simon & Schmidt, Alexander, 2018. "The Twitter myth revisited: Intraday investor sentiment, Twitter activity and individual-level stock return volatility," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 355-367.
    14. Luca Aguzzoni & Gregor Langus & Massimo Motta, 2013. "The Effect of EU Antitrust Investigations and Fines on a Firm's Valuation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 290-338, June.
    15. Mateev, Miroslav & Andonov, Kristiyan, 2018. "Do European bidders pay more in cross-border than in domestic acquisitions? New evidence from Continental Europe and the UK," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 529-556.
    16. Seppo Pynnonen, 2022. "Non-Parametric Statistic for Testing Cumulative Abnormal Stock Returns," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Fuenzalida, Darcy & Mongrut, Samuel & Arteaga, Jaime Raúl & Erausquin, Alexander, 2013. "Good corporate governance: Does it pay in Peru?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1759-1770.
    18. Jan Bartholdy & Dennis Olson & Paula Peare, 2007. "Conducting Event Studies on a Small Stock Exchange," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 227-252.
    19. Fisher-Vanden, Karen & Thorburn, Karin S., 2011. "Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 430-445.
    20. Saeed Ghasseminejad & Mohammad R. Jahan-Parvar, 2020. "The Impact of Financial Sanctions: The Case of Iran 2011-2016," International Finance Discussion Papers 1281, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trump tweets; Market reactions; Investor attention; Media attention;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:33:y:2022:i:c:s2214635021001386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-behavioral-and-experimental-finance .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.