IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v377y2025ipcs0306261924019640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative multi-actor multi-criteria optimization framework for process integration

Author

Listed:
  • Lechtenberg, Fabian
  • Aresté-Saló, Lluc
  • Espuña, Antonio
  • Graells, Moisès

Abstract

Paradigm shifts towards sustainable production systems, as intended by industrial symbiosis and circular economy solutions, require multi-criteria decision-making and consensus among resource-sharing actors, yet a structured methodology for balancing diverse company preferences in such integrated process systems remains absent. This paper introduces the Process Integration Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Optimization (PI-MAMCO) framework, which builds upon heuristic principles for the solution of multi-actor multi-criteria situations, while incorporating holistic optimization and cooperative game theory techniques, specifically tailored for addressing PI challenges. For the first time, multiple criteria benefits are allocated simultaneously, and the consequences on stability are discussed. The method is demonstrated in a palm oil complex, integrating a mill, a combined heat and power plant, and a refinery to efficiently manage effluents and generate utilities for internal use or sale. Goal programming yields stable coalitional benefits of 5.7 million USD and 41.0kt CO2e per year, allowing fair benefit allocation among participants without any party incurring a loss in any criterion. This demonstrates how PI-MAMCO enables stakeholders in the process industry to propose binding inter-company collaboration contracts by harmonizing the perspectives of involved actors, identifying agreements impractical to achieve otherwise. However, unstable regions for certain preference articulations are identified, and examples for unstable allocations using the often employed Shapley value and the Maali’s method are given.

Suggested Citation

  • Lechtenberg, Fabian & Aresté-Saló, Lluc & Espuña, Antonio & Graells, Moisès, 2025. "Cooperative multi-actor multi-criteria optimization framework for process integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pc:s0306261924019640
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924019640
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian, Yitong & Li, Shaojun, 2022. "Multi-plant direct heat integration considering coalition stability under unplanned shutdown risks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Andiappan, Viknesh & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah, 2022. "Systematic optimisation framework for a sustainable multi-owner palm oil-based complex," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    3. Fioriti, Davide & Frangioni, Antonio & Poli, Davide, 2021. "Optimal sizing of energy communities with fair revenue sharing and exit clauses: Value, role and business model of aggregators and users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    4. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Liu, Songsong & Papageorgiou, Lazaros G., 2018. "Fair profit distribution in multi-echelon supply chains via transfer prices," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 77-94.
    6. Rahmani-Dabbagh, Saeed & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem, 2016. "A profit sharing scheme for distributed energy resources integrated into a virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 313-328.
    7. Tijs, S.H. & Driessen, T.S.H., 1986. "Game theory and cost allocation problems," Other publications TiSEM 376c24c5-c95d-4d29-96b6-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. M. Maschler & B. Peleg & L. S. Shapley, 1979. "Geometric Properties of the Kernel, Nucleolus, and Related Solution Concepts," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 303-338, November.
    9. Tan, Yue Dian & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah, 2020. "Multi-objective optimal design for integrated palm oil mill complex with consideration of effluent elimination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Macharis, Cathy & De Witte, Astrid & Turcksin, Laurence, 2010. "The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 303-311, September.
    11. Jin, Yuhui & Chang, Chuei-Tin & Li, Shaojun & Jiang, Da, 2018. "On the use of risk-based Shapley values for cost sharing in interplant heat integration programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 904-920.
    12. López-Flores, Francisco Javier & Hernández-Pérez, Luis Germán & Lira-Barragán, Luis Fernando & Rubio-Castro, Eusiel & Ponce-Ortega, José M., 2022. "Optimal Profit Distribution in Interplant Waste Heat Integration through a Hybrid Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    13. Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Ke & Ma, Xin, 2021. "Game theory-based multi-agent capacity optimization for integrated energy systems with compressed air energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Jicheng Liu & Dandan He, 2018. "Profit Allocation of Hybrid Power System Planning in Energy Internet: A Cooperative Game Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Shen, Jianjian & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Xiufei & Zhou, Binbin, 2018. "Coordinated operations of multiple-reservoir cascaded hydropower plants with cooperation benefit allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 509-518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Lijun & Du, Wenjing & Zhang, Wencheng & Zhao, Laijun & Wang, Zhaohua, 2023. "An inter-provincial cooperation model under Renewable Portfolio Standard policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Yang, Shenbo & Tan, Zhongfu & Lin, Hongyu & Li, Peng & De, Gejirifu & Zhou, Feng’ao & Ju, Liwei, 2020. "A two-stage optimization model for Park Integrated Energy System operation and benefit allocation considering the effect of Time-Of-Use energy price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. M. Fiestras-Janeiro & Ignacio García-Jurado & Manuel Mosquera, 2011. "Cooperative games and cost allocation problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Liu, Jia-Cai & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Li, Deng-Feng & Dai, Yong-Wu, 2021. "Collaborative profit allocation schemes for logistics enterprise coalitions with incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Lozano, S., 2012. "Information sharing in DEA: A cooperative game theory approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 558-565.
    6. Christoph Weissbart, 2018. "Decarbonization of Power Markets under Stability and Fairness: Do They Influence Efficiency?," ifo Working Paper Series 270, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    7. Behzad Hezarkhani & Marco Slikker & Tom Woensel, 2016. "A competitive solution for cooperative truckload delivery," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 51-80, January.
    8. Stefan Engevall & Maud Göthe-Lundgren & Peter Värbrand, 2004. "The Heterogeneous Vehicle-Routing Game," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 71-85, February.
    9. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    10. E. Calvo & E. Gutiérrez, 1996. "A prekernel characterization by means of stability properties," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 4(2), pages 257-267, December.
    11. Alparslan-Gok, S.Z. & Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Cooperative Interval Games Arising from Airport Situations with Interval Data," Other publications TiSEM 5ded50b5-2a11-4d25-8511-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. H. Andrew Michener & Daniel J. Myers, 1998. "Probabilistic Coalition Structure Theories," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 830-860, December.
    13. A. Kovalenkov & M. Holtz Wooders, 1999. "An explicit bound on e for nonemptiness of e-cores of games," THEMA Working Papers 99-37, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    14. Zaporozhets, Vera & García-Valiñas, María & Kurz, Sascha, 2016. "Key drivers of EU budget allocation: Does power matter?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 57-70.
    15. Francesc Llerena & Marina Nunez, 2011. "A geometric characterization of the nucleolus of the assignment game," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(4), pages 3275-3285.
    16. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    17. Tamas Solymosi & Balazs Sziklai, 2015. "Universal Characterization Sets for the Nucleolus in Balanced Games," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1512, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    18. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joëlle Morana, 2014. "Assessing urban logistics pooling sustainability via a hierarchic dashboard from a group decision perspective," Working Papers halshs-01053887, HAL.
    19. Stéphane Gonzalez & Aymeric Lardon, 2018. "Optimal deterrence of cooperation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(1), pages 207-227, March.
    20. Lejano, Raul P. & Davos, Climis A., 2001. "Siting noxious facilities with victim compensation: : n-person games under transferable utility," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 109-124.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pc:s0306261924019640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.