IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v367y2024ics0306261924008559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating FFTA based safety assessment of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems in multi-objective optimization for integrated energy systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Jiawei
  • Chen, Xingyu
  • Bu, Yang
  • Wang, Feng
  • Wang, Jialing
  • Huang, Xianan
  • Hu, Zhenda
  • Liu, Lin
  • Lin, Changzhui
  • Meng, Chao
  • Lin, Jian
  • Xie, Shan
  • Xu, Jinmei
  • Jing, Rui
  • Zhao, Yingru

Abstract

Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) have been widely adopted in energy systems due to their many advantages. However, the high energy density and thermal stability issues associated with lithium-ion batteries have led to a rise in BESS-related safety incidents, which often bring about severe casualties and property losses. To accurately evaluate the safety of lithium-ion BESS, this study proposes a probabilistic risk assessment method (PRA) that incorporates fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) with expert knowledge aggregation. This approach takes into account the impact of BESS design variations and provides risk probability estimates for safety incidents in BESS. Based on the risk assessment, an energy system design framework is developed. This framework introduces a quantified risk indicator for BESS and establishes a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to examine the implications of BESS design on self-safety, as well as its interactive effects on the economics of integrated energy systems (IES). A case study conducted in an industrial park in Ningde, China, demonstrates that differences in safety requirements from investors can lead to cost variations of up to 6.8%. Furthermore, the study reveals the deep coupling between the safety and economics of BESS, highlighting that a cost-optimal approach which neglects safety can result in a 4.5% increase in the probability of BESS safety incident risk compared to a safety-optimal approach. Overall, this study contributes to the understanding of the interplay between safety and economics in BESS design. By employing a combination of quantitative evaluation and mathematical optimization methods, the present study provides a rational and feasible strategy, as well as a modeling perspective, for the safety design of BESS, paving the way for safer and more efficient integration of BESS in integrated energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Jiawei & Chen, Xingyu & Bu, Yang & Wang, Feng & Wang, Jialing & Huang, Xianan & Hu, Zhenda & Liu, Lin & Lin, Changzhui & Meng, Chao & Lin, Jian & Xie, Shan & Xu, Jinmei & Jing, Rui & Zhao, Yingru, 2024. "Incorporating FFTA based safety assessment of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems in multi-objective optimization for integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:367:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924008559
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924008559
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:367:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924008559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.