IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v227y2025ics0921800924003379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's global leadership aspirations and domestic support for climate policy

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang, C.
  • van Gevelt, T.

Abstract

In recent years, China has pivoted towards a global leadership role in mitigating and adapting to climate change. Notwithstanding the complex political economic reasons underlying China's global leadership aspirations, we are interested in seeing whether the associated national discourse championed by the state increases domestic support for climate policy. That is, do China's international leadership aspirations foster a unifying sense of national pride among the domestic population, thereby lending support to the legitimacy of the state and expediting the implementation of costly domestic climate policies? To test our hypothesis, we enumerated a vignette experiment embedded with conjoint analysis to a nationally representative sample (n = 4788). We found no evidence that exposure to China's global leadership aspirations increased domestic support for national-level climate policy, as proxied by a carbon tax. Indeed, we found that exposure to China's global climate leadership aspirations decreased domestic support for a carbon tax under certain scenarios. Our findings demonstrate a potential disconnect between global and local climate policy discourses and suggest that China's policymakers need to exercise caution in ensuring that their global climate leadership aspirations do not come at the expense of decreased domestic support for the national-level policies required to meet China's goal of carbon neutrality by 2060.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang, C. & van Gevelt, T., 2025. "China's global leadership aspirations and domestic support for climate policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:227:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924003379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ganter, Flavien, 2023. "Identification of Preferences in Forced-Choice Conjoint Experiments: Reassessing the Quantity of Interest," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 98-112, January.
    2. Thomas Bernauer & Liam F. McGrath, 2016. "Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 680-683, July.
    3. Paul G. Bain & Matthew J. Hornsey & Renata Bongiorno & Carla Jeffries, 2012. "Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 600-603, August.
    4. He, Gang & Lin, Jiang & Sifuentes, Froylan & Liu, Xu & Abhyankar, Nikit & Phadke, Amol, 2020. "Author Correction: Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt11x8b9hc, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    5. Urban, Frauke, 2018. "China's rise: Challenging the North-South technology transfer paradigm for climate change mitigation and low carbon energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 320-330.
    6. Alló, Maria & Loureiro, Maria L., 2014. "The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 563-574.
    7. Peter W. Hatfield & Jim A. Gaffney & Gemma J. Anderson & Suzanne Ali & Luca Antonelli & Suzan Başeğmez du Pree & Jonathan Citrin & Marta Fajardo & Patrick Knapp & Brendan Kettle & Bogdan Kustowski & M, 2021. "The data-driven future of high-energy-density physics," Nature, Nature, vol. 593(7859), pages 351-361, May.
    8. Gang He & Jiang Lin & Froylan Sifuentes & Xu Liu & Nikit Abhyankar & Amol Phadke, 2020. "Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Dong, Feng & Liu, Yajie, 2020. "Policy evolution and effect evaluation of new-energy vehicle industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Chen, Hao & Yan, Haobo & Gong, Kai & Geng, Haopeng & Yuan, Xiao-Chen, 2022. "Assessing the business interruption costs from power outages in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Hainmueller, Jens & Hopkins, Daniel J. & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2014. "Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-30, January.
    12. Young, Oran R., 1991. "Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 281-308, July.
    13. Paul G. Bain & Matthew J. Hornsey & Renata Bongiorno & Carla Jeffries, 2012. "Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 603-603, August.
    14. Stavins, Robert N., 2003. "Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 9, pages 355-435, Elsevier.
    15. Connor Huff & Joshua D. Kertzer, 2018. "How the Public Defines Terrorism," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(1), pages 55-71, January.
    16. Ezra M. Markowitz & Azim F. Shariff, 2012. "Climate change and moral judgement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 243-247, April.
    17. Liam F. Beiser-McGrath & Thomas Bernauer, 2022. "Domestic Provision of Global Public Goods: How Other Countries' Behavior Affects Public Support for Climate Policy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 22(1), pages 117-138, Winter.
    18. Jidong Chen & Jennifer Pan & Yiqing Xu, 2016. "Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 383-400, April.
    19. Duong, Cong Thuy & Duong, Nguyen Cam & Chuc, Hoang Thi Hong & Chi, Nguyen Hoang & Chi, Vu Quynh & Chi, Hoang Thi Linh & Dương, Phan Thùy & , Le Thi Thanh Diem & Dung, Doan Thu & Dung, Nguyen Tan, 2021. "Climate change, energy depletion, and the greenhouse effect," OSF Preprints 6rcps, Center for Open Science.
    20. Ratkovic, Marc & Tingley, Dustin, 2017. "Sparse Estimation and Uncertainty with Application to Subgroup Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 1-40, January.
    21. Z. Eylem Gevrek & Ayse Uyduranoglu, 2015. "Public Preferences for Carbon Tax Attributes," Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, University of Konstanz 2015-15, Department of Economics, University of Konstanz.
    22. Anita Engels, 2018. "Understanding how China is championing climate change mitigation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    23. Donald B. Marron & Eric J. Toder, 2014. "Tax Policy Issues in Designing a Carbon Tax," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 563-568, May.
    24. Shaun Larcom & Po-Wen She & Terry Gevelt, 2019. "The UK summer heatwave of 2018 and public concern over energy security," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 370-373, May.
    25. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2019. "Addressing climate change through price and non-price interventions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 594-612.
    26. Stefano Carattini & Maria Carvalho & Sam Fankhauser, 2018. "Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(5), September.
    27. Michaël Aklin & Matto Mildenberger, 2020. "Prisoners of the Wrong Dilemma: Why Distributive Conflict, Not Collective Action, Characterizes the Politics of Climate Change," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(4), pages 4-27, Autumn.
    28. Matthew Lockwood, 2011. "Does the framing of climate policies make a difference to public support? Evidence from UK marginal constituencies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 1097-1112, July.
    29. Gevrek, Z.Eylem & Uyduranoglu, Ayse, 2015. "Public preferences for carbon tax attributes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 186-197.
    30. Liam F. Beiser-McGrath & Thomas Bernauer, 2019. "Commitment failures are unlikely to undermine public support for the Paris agreement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(3), pages 248-252, March.
    31. Gang He & Jiang Lin & Froylan Sifuentes & Xu Liu & Nikit Abhyankar & Amol Phadke, 2020. "Author Correction: Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1, December.
    32. Sabine Roeser, 2012. "Risk Communication, Public Engagement, and Climate Change: A Role for Emotions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 1033-1040, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingyu Lei & Feng Chen & Yinchu Wang & Zilong Liu & Xingchuang Xiong & Xiaoping Song, 2025. "Difference Analysis of Coal Carbon Emission Coefficient in China and Its Effects on Carbon Emission Calculation, Quota Allocation, and Enterprise Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Carattini & Andrea Baranzini & Philippe Thalmann & Frédéric Varone & Frank Vöhringer, 2017. "Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(1), pages 97-128, September.
    2. Wang, Delu & Mao, Jinqi & Shi, Xunpeng & Li, Chunxiao & Chen, Fan, 2024. "A planning model for coal power exit scales based on minimizing idle and shortage losses: A case study of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Douenne, Thomas & Fabre, Adrien, 2020. "French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2022. "Rendre acceptable la nécessaire taxation du carbone. Quelles pistes pour la France ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 15-53.
    5. Aklin, Michaël & Buntaine, Mark T & Mildenberger, Matto, 2023. "Conditionality and the Politics of Climate Change," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt3mb417zg, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    6. Stefano Carattini & Simon Levin & Alessandro Tavoni, 2019. "Cooperation in the Climate Commons," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 227-247.
    7. Adam Seth Levine & Reuben Kline, 2017. "A new approach for evaluating climate change communication," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 301-309, May.
    8. Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw & Collewet, Marion & DiGiuseppe, Matthew & Vrijburg, Hendrik, 2024. "How to finance green investments? The role of public debt," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Tomaselli, Maria Fernanda & Kozak, Robert & Gifford, Robert & Sheppard, Stephen R.J., 2021. "Degrowth or Not Degrowth: The Importance of Message Frames for Characterizing the New Economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Wei, Yigang & Gong, Ping & Zhang, Jianhong & Wang, Li, 2021. "Exploring public opinions on climate change policy in "Big Data Era"—A case study of the European Union Emission Trading System (EU-ETS) based on Twitter," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2023. "Sustainable development pathways of China's wind power industry under uncertainties: Perspective from economic benefits and technical potential," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. David Klenert & Franziska Funke & Linus Mattauch & Brian O’Callaghan, 2020. "Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 751-778, August.
    14. Natalia Gonzalez & Paul Serna-Torre & Pedro A. Sánchez-Pérez & Ryan Davidson & Bryan Murray & Martin Staadecker & Julia Szinai & Rachel Wei & Daniel M. Kammen & Deborah A. Sunter & Patricia Hidalgo-Go, 2024. "Offshore wind and wave energy can reduce total installed capacity required in zero-emissions grids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Tan, Jiawei & Chen, Xingyu & Bu, Yang & Wang, Feng & Wang, Jialing & Huang, Xianan & Hu, Zhenda & Liu, Lin & Lin, Changzhui & Meng, Chao & Lin, Jian & Xie, Shan & Xu, Jinmei & Jing, Rui & Zhao, Yingru, 2024. "Incorporating FFTA based safety assessment of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems in multi-objective optimization for integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    16. Bourgeois, Cyril & Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan & Quirion, Philippe, 2021. "Lump-sum vs. energy-efficiency subsidy recycling of carbon tax revenue in the residential sector: A French assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Yao, En-jian & Zhang, Tian-yu & Wang, David Z.W. & Zhang, Jun-yi, 2024. "Dynamic planning and decarbonization pathways of the highway power supply network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PB).
    18. Ping, Dazhou & Li, Chaosu & Yu, Xiaojun & Liu, Zhengxuan & Tu, Ran & Zhou, Yuekuan, 2025. "City-scale information modelling for urban energy resilience with optimal battery energy storages in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    19. Jakub Sokołowski & Piotr Lewandowski & Jan Frankowski, 2023. "How to Prevent Yellow Vests? Evaluating Preferences for a Carbon Tax with a Discrete Choice Experiment," IBS Working Papers 03/2023, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    20. Martin Rabbia, 2023. "Why did Argentina and Uruguay decide to pursue a carbon tax? Fiscal reforms and explicit carbon prices," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(2), pages 230-259, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:227:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924003379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.