IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v358y2024ics0306261923019153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics study of non-equilibrium flash for two-phase expansion based on equivalent expansion experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiaoran
  • Wu, Weifeng
  • Zhang, Yin
  • Li, Chengyi
  • Zhang, Jing
  • Guo, Chengqiang
  • Wang, Jiangfeng

Abstract

The two-phase expansion inside the expander could be divided into the non-equilibrium flash of superheated liquid and the expansion of the vapor. A higher flash rate would permit higher recovered expansion work. However, it is almost impossible to measure the flash rate inside the expansion chamber. In this paper, an equivalent expansion method s was proposed to study the non-equilibrium flash process for the two-phase expansion. The flash was controlled inside a constant volume flash chamber, which was connected to a vacuum tank to introduce and adjust the flashed vapor rate out of the flash chamber. The flash process inside the chamber was controlled under the working conditions similar to that inside the two-phase expander. By applying the equivalent expansion method, the flash rate could be measured easily. The experiments were carried out with an initial liquid height inside the chamber from 110 to 175 mm, and an initial liquid temperature from 110 to 130 °C with water as the working fluid. The instant flash rate and the PV diagram of the equivalent two-phase expansion were studied. Results showed that the instant flash rate increased and decreased sharply at first, and then the flash became gentle. Thus, the non-equilibrium flash of the two-phase expansion was divided into two stages of the rapid expansion process and the gradual expansion process. It was found that most of the flashed mass was generated during the rapid expansion process. Finally, a non-equilibrium flash model was proposed to simulate the flash process during the two-phase expansion process with the accuracy of ±3.7% predicting the pressure profile and the accuracy of ±2.7% predicting the expansion work.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiaoran & Wu, Weifeng & Zhang, Yin & Li, Chengyi & Zhang, Jing & Guo, Chengqiang & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2024. "Characteristics study of non-equilibrium flash for two-phase expansion based on equivalent expansion experiments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:358:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923019153
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923019153
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai, Ngoc Anh & Fischer, Johann, 2012. "Efficiencies of power flash cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1017-1027.
    2. Steffen, Michael & Löffler, Michael & Schaber, Karlheinz, 2013. "Efficiency of a new Triangle Cycle with flash evaporation in a piston engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 295-307.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    2. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    3. Löffler, Michael, 2017. "Batch Processes in Heat Engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 788-794.
    4. Mehr, A.S. & MosayebNezhad, M. & Lanzini, A. & Yari, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of a novel SOFC based CCHP system in a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 299-309.
    5. Guillaume Lhermet & Nicolas Tauveron & Nadia Caney & Quentin Blondel & Franck Morin, 2022. "A Recent Advance on Partial Evaporating Organic Rankine Cycle: Experimental Results on an Axial Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Knez, Ž. & Markočič, E. & Leitgeb, M. & Primožič, M. & Knez Hrnčič, M. & Škerget, M., 2014. "Industrial applications of supercritical fluids: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 235-243.
    7. Sun, Hongchuang & Qin, Jiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Lin, Chih-Hung & Lin, Yi-Fan, 2018. "Performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with expansion from superheated zone or two-phase zone based on temperature utilization rate of heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 566-576.
    8. Long, Rui & Li, Baode & Liu, Zhichun & Liu, Wei, 2015. "A hybrid system using a regenerative electrochemical cycle to harvest waste heat from the proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2079-2086.
    9. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Rijpkema, J. & Munch, K. & Andersson, S.B., 2018. "Thermodynamic potential of twelve working fluids in Rankine and flash cycles for waste heat recovery in heavy duty diesel engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 996-1007.
    11. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    12. Long, R. & Bao, Y.J. & Huang, X.M. & Liu, W., 2014. "Exergy analysis and working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 475-483.
    13. Gleinser, Moritz & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Batch evaporation power cycle: Influence of thermal inertia and residence time," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1090-1101.
    14. Long, Rui & Li, Baode & Liu, Zhichun & Liu, Wei, 2015. "Multi-objective optimization of a continuous thermally regenerative electrochemical cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1022-1029.
    15. Li, Gang, 2016. "Organic Rankine cycle performance evaluation and thermoeconomic assessment with various applications part II: Economic assessment aspect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 490-505.
    16. Zhang, Bo & Wang, Enhua & Meng, Fanxiao & Zhang, Fujun & Zhao, Changlu, 2020. "Prediction accuracy of thermodynamic properties using PC-SAFT for high-temperature organic Rankine cycle with siloxanes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    17. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    18. Moritz Gleinser & Christoph Wieland, 2016. "The Misselhorn Cycle: Batch-Evaporation Process for Efficient Low-Temperature Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    19. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    20. Long, Rui & Li, Baode & Liu, Zhichun & Liu, Wei, 2016. "Ecological analysis of a thermally regenerative electrochemical cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 95-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:358:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923019153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.