IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v352y2023ics0306261923012515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power transition cycles of reversible solid oxide cells and its impacts on microgrids

Author

Listed:
  • del Pozo Gonzalez, Hector
  • Bernadet, Lucile
  • Torrell, Marc
  • Bianchi, Fernando D.
  • Tarancón, Albert
  • Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol
  • Dominguez-Garcia, Jose Luis

Abstract

Currently, reversible solid oxide cells (rSOC) are the only devices that allows a bidirectional conversion of H2O and H2, being able to operate as fuel cell and as electrolyzer. Thanks to the high-temperature operation, rSOC present a higher efficiency and additionally, provide a feasible solution for long-term energy storage in electrical systems. Experimental testing of rSOC have been mainly focused on cells characterization, thermal or degradation analysis, but the study of transition cycles has not been widely studied. The transitions between the operation as a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and as a solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) might have a significant impact on the rest of the electrical system in which the rSOC is integrated. This article analyzes experimentally the power responses of a rSOC stack, during each operating mode (SOEC-SOFC) and during transition between both modes. The results suggest that transition cycles can be achieved in less than 8 min and the total transition from SOEC rated power to SOFC rated power in less than 10 min, having a significant impact on microgrid operations, especially in islanded mode. The obtained results indicate that the most suitable role for rSOC in a microgrid is as grid-following. The grid-forming role is only possible if the rSOC operates along with a fast-response power source.

Suggested Citation

  • del Pozo Gonzalez, Hector & Bernadet, Lucile & Torrell, Marc & Bianchi, Fernando D. & Tarancón, Albert & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Dominguez-Garcia, Jose Luis, 2023. "Power transition cycles of reversible solid oxide cells and its impacts on microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:352:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923012515
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923012515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hector del Pozo Gonzalez & Marc Torrell & Lucile Bernadet & Fernando D. Bianchi & Lluís Trilla & Albert Tarancón & Jose Luis Domínguez-García, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling and Thermal Control of a 1.5 kW Reversible Solid Oxide Stack for 24/7 Hydrogen Plants," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Vitale, F. & Rispoli, N. & Sorrentino, M. & Rosen, M.A. & Pianese, C., 2021. "On the use of dynamic programming for optimal energy management of grid-connected reversible solid oxide cell-based renewable microgrids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Srikanth, S. & Heddrich, M.P. & Gupta, S. & Friedrich, K.A., 2018. "Transient reversible solid oxide cell reactor operation – Experimentally validated modeling and analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 473-488.
    4. Califano, M. & Sorrentino, M. & Rosen, M.A. & Pianese, C., 2022. "Optimal heat and power management of a reversible solid oxide cell based microgrid for effective technoeconomic hydrogen consumption and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    5. Buttler, Alexander & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2440-2454.
    6. Hu, Kewei & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Huang, Danji & Zhong, Zhiyao & Yang, Xiaobo & Wang, Lei, 2022. "Comparative study of alkaline water electrolysis, proton exchange membrane water electrolysis and solid oxide electrolysis through multiphysics modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Chunjun & Strbac, Goran & Zong, Yi & You, Shi & Træholt, Chresten & Brandon, Nigel & Wang, Jiawei & Ameli, Hossein, 2024. "Modeling and optimal operation of reversible solid oxide cells considering heat recovery and mode switching dynamics in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Chunjun & Strbac, Goran & Zong, Yi & You, Shi & Træholt, Chresten & Brandon, Nigel & Wang, Jiawei & Ameli, Hossein, 2024. "Modeling and optimal operation of reversible solid oxide cells considering heat recovery and mode switching dynamics in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    2. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Hasan Ozcan & Rami S. El-Emam & Bahman Amini Horri, 2023. "Recent Advances in High-Temperature Steam Electrolysis with Solid Oxide Electrolysers for Green Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-50, April.
    3. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Dynamic simulation and thermoeconomic analysis of a power to gas system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Hu, Kewei & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Huang, Danji & Zhong, Zhiyao & Yang, Xiaobo & Wang, Lei, 2022. "Comparative study of alkaline water electrolysis, proton exchange membrane water electrolysis and solid oxide electrolysis through multiphysics modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. Paolo Aliberti & Marco Sorrentino & Marco Califano & Cesare Pianese & Luca Capozucca & Laura Cristiani & Gianpiero Lops & Roberto Mancini, 2023. "Modelling Methodologies to Design and Control Renewables and Hydrogen-Based Telecom Towers Power Supply Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Huang, Danji & Xiong, Binyu & Fang, Jiakun & Hu, Kewei & Zhong, Zhiyao & Ying, Yuheng & Ai, Xiaomeng & Chen, Zhe, 2022. "A multiphysics model of the compactly-assembled industrial alkaline water electrolysis cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Califano, M. & Sorrentino, M. & Rosen, M.A. & Pianese, C., 2022. "Optimal heat and power management of a reversible solid oxide cell based microgrid for effective technoeconomic hydrogen consumption and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    8. Min, Gyubin & Choi, Saeyoung & Hong, Jongsup, 2022. "A review of solid oxide steam-electrolysis cell systems: Thermodynamics and thermal integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    9. Hu, Song & Guo, Bin & Ding, Shunliang & Yang, Fuyuan & Dang, Jian & Liu, Biao & Gu, Junjie & Ma, Jugang & Ouyang, Minggao, 2022. "A comprehensive review of alkaline water electrolysis mathematical modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    10. Kim, Sunwoo & Choi, Yechan & Park, Joungho & Adams, Derrick & Heo, Seongmin & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Multi-period, multi-timescale stochastic optimization model for simultaneous capacity investment and energy management decisions for hybrid Micro-Grids with green hydrogen production under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    11. Oliver Wagner & Thomas Adisorn & Lena Tholen & Dagmar Kiyar, 2020. "Surviving the Energy Transition: Development of a Proposal for Evaluating Sustainable Business Models for Incumbents in Germany’s Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    12. d'Amore-Domenech, Rafael & Leo, Teresa J. & Pollet, Bruno G., 2021. "Bulk power transmission at sea: Life cycle cost comparison of electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    13. Trowell, K.A. & Goroshin, S. & Frost, D.L. & Bergthorson, J.M., 2020. "Aluminum and its role as a recyclable, sustainable carrier of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Wang, Jianxiao & An, Qi & Zhao, Yue & Pan, Guangsheng & Song, Jie & Hu, Qinran & Tan, Chin-Woo, 2023. "Role of electrolytic hydrogen in smart city decarbonization in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    15. Mikovits, Christian & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Wehrle, Sebastian & Baumgartner, Johann & Schmidt, Johannes, 2021. "Stronger together: Multi-annual variability of hydrogen production supported by wind power in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    16. Gorre, Jachin & Ortloff, Felix & van Leeuwen, Charlotte, 2019. "Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized Power-to-Gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Dong, Tianshu & Duan, Xiudong & Huang, Yuanyuan & Huang, Danji & Luo, Yingdong & Liu, Ziyu & Ai, Xiaomeng & Fang, Jiakun & Song, Chaolong, 2024. "Enhancement of hydrogen production via optimizing micro-structures of electrolyzer on a microfluidic platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    18. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    20. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2022. "Greenhouse gas life cycle analysis of China's fuel cell medium- and heavy-duty trucks under segmented usage scenarios and vehicle types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:352:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923012515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.