IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1486-d1055802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Solar and Biomass Resources to Generate Renewable Energy: Can We Find Local Complementarities in the Agricultural Setting?

Author

Listed:
  • Gillianne Bowman

    (Sustainable Forestry Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland)

  • Thierry Huber

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Vanessa Burg

    (Sustainable Forestry Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
    Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Today, an energy transition is underway to tackle the problems of climate change and energy sufficiency. For this transition to succeed, it is essential to use all available renewable energy resources most efficiently. However, renewable energies often bring a high level of volatility that needs to be balanced. One solution is combining the use of different renewable sources to increase the overall energy output or reduce its environmental impact. Here, we estimate the agricultural solar and biomass resources at the local level in Switzerland, considering their spatial and temporal variability using geographic information systems. We then identify the technologies that could allow for synergies or complementarities. Overall, the technical agricultural resources potential is a ~15 PJ/annum biogas yield from residual biomass and ~10 TWh/a in terms of electricity from solar photovoltaic tiles installed on roofs (the equivalent to ~36 PJ/a). Biomethane upgrading, power to X, electrolysis, cooling or photovoltaic roofing on biogas facilities are among the examples that could foster complementarity in the system if resources are pooled within the agricultural setting. Temporal complementarity at the farm scale can only lead to partial autarchy. The possible benefits of these complementarities should be further investigated, looking in particular at the economic viability of such systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillianne Bowman & Thierry Huber & Vanessa Burg, 2023. "Linking Solar and Biomass Resources to Generate Renewable Energy: Can We Find Local Complementarities in the Agricultural Setting?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1486-:d:1055802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Guorui & Wan, Jie & Liu, Jinfu & Yu, Daren, 2019. "Spatial and temporal assessments of complementarity for renewable energy resources in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 262-275.
    2. Dong, Feiqing & Lu, Jianbo, 2013. "Using solar energy to enhance biogas production from livestock residue – A case study of the Tongren biogas engineering pig farm in South China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 759-765.
    3. Canales, Fausto A. & Jurasz, Jakub & Beluco, Alexandre & Kies, Alexander, 2020. "Assessing temporal complementarity between three variable energy sources through correlation and compromise programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Siegrist, Armin & Bowman, Gillianne & Burg, Vanessa, 2022. "Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    5. Clausen, Laura Tolnov & Rudolph, David, 2020. "Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Berger, Mathias & Radu, David & Fonteneau, Raphaël & Henry, Robin & Glavic, Mevludin & Fettweis, Xavier & Le Du, Marc & Panciatici, Patrick & Balea, Lucian & Ernst, Damien, 2020. "Critical time windows for renewable resource complementarity assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Zemo, Kahsay Haile & Termansen, Mette, 2018. "Farmers’ willingness to participate in collective biogas investment: A discrete choice experiment study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 87-101.
    8. Spiecker, Stephan & Weber, Christoph, 2014. "The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 185-197.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Chenchen & Guo, Zhiling & Liu, Zhengguang & Hongyun, Zhang & Liu, Ran & Zhang, Haoran, 2024. "Application of photovoltaics on different types of land in China: Opportunities, status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Máximo Domínguez-Garabitos & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2023. "Biomass Energy Potential of Agricultural Residues in the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henao, Felipe & Viteri, Juan P. & Rodríguez, Yeny & Gómez, Juan & Dyner, Isaac, 2020. "Annual and interannual complementarities of renewable energy sources in Colombia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Harrison-Atlas, Dylan & Murphy, Caitlin & Schleifer, Anna & Grue, Nicholas, 2022. "Temporal complementarity and value of wind-PV hybrid systems across the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 111-123.
    3. Gao, Yang & Ma, Shaoxiu & Wang, Tao & Miao, Changhong & Yang, Fan, 2022. "Distributed onshore wind farm siting using intelligent optimization algorithm based on spatial and temporal variability of wind energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Pedruzzi, Rizzieri & Silva, Allan Rodrigues & Soares dos Santos, Thalyta & Araujo, Allan Cavalcante & Cotta Weyll, Arthur Lúcide & Lago Kitagawa, Yasmin Kaore & Nunes da Silva Ramos, Diogo & Milani de, 2023. "Review of mapping analysis and complementarity between solar and wind energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Huang, Kangdi & Luo, Peng & Liu, Pan & KIM, Jong Suk & Wang, Yintang & Xu, Weifeng & Li, He & Gong, Yu, 2022. "Improving complementarity of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet load demand by using hydropower regulation ability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    6. Karadöl, İsrafil & Yıldız, Ceyhun & Şekkeli, Mustafa, 2021. "Determining optimal spatial and temporal complementarity between wind and hydropower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Prasad, Abhnil Amtesh & Yang, Yuqing & Kay, Merlinde & Menictas, Chris & Bremner, Stephen, 2021. "Synergy of solar photovoltaics-wind-battery systems in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Diana Cantor & Andrés Ochoa & Oscar Mesa, 2022. "Total Variation-Based Metrics for Assessing Complementarity in Energy Resources Time Series," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Jani, Hardik K. & Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh & Nagababu, Garlapati & Das, Alok, 2022. "Temporal and spatial simultaneity assessment of wind-solar energy resources in India by statistical analysis and machine learning clustering approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Alimou, Yacine & Maïzi, Nadia & Bourmaud, Jean-Yves & Li, Marion, 2020. "Assessing the security of electricity supply through multi-scale modeling: The TIMES-ANTARES linking approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Petr Hlavacek & Vladim r Skaln k, 2021. "The Implementation of Smart Energy into Transformation of the Rural Area: The Use of Public Policies for Smart Villages Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6.
    12. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    14. Qingqin Wang & Xiaofeng Sun & Ruonan Wang & Lining Zhou & Haizhu Zhou & Yanqiang Di & Yanyi Li & Qi Zhang, 2023. "Research on Urban Energy Sustainable Plan under the Background of Low-Carbon Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Zhang, Yusheng & Ma, Chao & Yang, Yang & Pang, Xiulan & Lian, Jijian & Wang, Xin, 2022. "Capacity configuration and economic evaluation of a power system integrating hydropower, solar, and wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Sergei Kulakov, 2019. "X-model: further development and possible modifications," Papers 1907.09206, arXiv.org.
    17. He, Yi & Guo, Su & Zhou, Jianxu & Wu, Feng & Huang, Jing & Pei, Huanjin, 2021. "The many-objective optimal design of renewable energy cogeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Zhang, Chao & Fan, Yupeng & Fang, Chuanglin, 2024. "Orderly and synergistic development of urban-rural integration based on evolutionary game model: A case study in the Jiangxi Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Neda Hajibandeh & Mehdi Ehsan & Soodabeh Soleymani & Miadreza Shafie-khah & João P. S. Catalão, 2017. "The Mutual Impact of Demand Response Programs and Renewable Energies: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Mahmoud A. Attia & Mariam A. Sameh, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow with Stochastic Renewable Energy Using Three Mixture Component Distribution Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1486-:d:1055802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.