IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v326y2022ics0306261922012375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grid-Oriented Coordination Strategy of Prosumers Using Game-theoretic Peer-to-Peer Trading Framework in Energy Community

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Won-Poong
  • Han, Dongjun
  • Won, Dongjun

Abstract

In this paper, a grid-oriented peer-to-peer (P2P) energy transaction strategy based on game theory that considers participants with diversity in trading and the impact on the system of trading is studied. For this, the optimization problem of prosumers with ESS is defined according to the lifetime cost of the ESS. The proposed energy trading strategy is carried out based on three game theories. Among them, the evolutionary game between buyers, non-cooperative games between sellers, and Stackelberg games between sellers and buyers are considered. When all games are played sequentially and the convergence point is reached, the negotiation is determined and then ends and a contract is made based on trading price and amount. As a novel contribution in the case of the evolutionary game the community manager indirectly provides information on the system so that when evaluating the seller, the effect on the system is applied as a loss change. In addition, when deriving a utility value by payoff, it is set as an increase/decrease ratio compared to the initial value so that the game proceeds regardless of the size of the participants and the defined problem. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed P2P energy trading strategy, a simulation based on MATLAB is performed. It is confirmed that the effect on the grid is applied to the seller's selling price. When the strategy proposed in the P2P energy trading is applied, the increased purchase and selling amount due to the trading increased by 3.41 % and 4.51 %, respectively, he difference between increased puchase and selling amount decreases by about 36 % from 3.181 kW to 2.03 kW, and the loss due to the change in trading amount also decreased by 1.59 %. This means that the grid impact has been reflected in the P2P energy trading, resulting in efficient operation, and it is the reason for grid operators to accept P2P energy trading. In conclusion, the results of the proposed strategy prove that efficiency in energy use is increased by considering the impacts of the power system in P2P energy trading.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Won-Poong & Han, Dongjun & Won, Dongjun, 2022. "Grid-Oriented Coordination Strategy of Prosumers Using Game-theoretic Peer-to-Peer Trading Framework in Energy Community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:326:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922012375
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922012375
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javadi, Mohammad Sadegh & Esmaeel Nezhad, Ali & Jordehi, Ahmad Rezaee & Gough, Matthew & Santos, Sérgio F. & Catalão, João P.S., 2022. "Transactive energy framework in multi-carrier energy hubs: A fully decentralized model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    2. Matthew Gough & Sérgio F. Santos & Mohammed Javadi & Rui Castro & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "Prosumer Flexibility: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review and Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Wonpoong Lee & Myeongseok Chae & Dongjun Won, 2022. "Optimal Scheduling of Energy Storage System Considering Life-Cycle Degradation Cost Using Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Zhou, Yue & Wu, Jianzhong & Long, Chao, 2018. "Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 993-1022.
    5. Long, Chao & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Jenkins, Nick, 2018. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 261-276.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia, Yuanxing & Xu, Qingshan & Fang, Jicheng & Tang, Rongchuan & Du, Pengwei, 2024. "Bipartite graph-based community-to-community matching in local energy market considering socially networked prosumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    2. Anna Ostrowska & Tomasz Sikorski & Alessandro Burgio & Michał Jasiński, 2023. "Modern Use of Prosumer Energy Regulation Capabilities for the Provision of Microgrid Flexibility Services," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Lefeng Cheng & Xin Wei & Manling Li & Can Tan & Meng Yin & Teng Shen & Tao Zou, 2024. "Integrating Evolutionary Game-Theoretical Methods and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Strategy Optimization in User-Side Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-56, October.
    4. Wu, Chun & Chen, Xingying & Hua, Haochen & Yu, Kun & Gan, Lei & Shen, Jun & Ding, Yi, 2024. "Peer-to-peer energy trading optimization for community prosumers considering carbon cap-and-trade," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    5. Xin, Baogui & Zhang, Mengwei, 2023. "Evolutionary game on international energy trade under the Russia-Ukraine conflict," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Barone, G. & Buonomano, A. & Forzano, C. & Palombo, A. & Russo, G., 2023. "The role of energy communities in electricity grid balancing: A flexible tool for smart grid power distribution optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Liao, Wei & Xiao, Fu & Li, Yanxue & Peng, Jinqing, 2024. "Comparative study on electricity transactions between multi-microgrid: A hybrid game theory-based peer-to-peer trading in heterogeneous building communities considering electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    8. Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Jaciow & Radosław Wolniak & Robert Wolny & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2023. "Energy Behaviors of Prosumers in Example of Polish Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Li, Ke & Ye, Ning & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui, 2023. "Distributed collaborative operation strategies in multi-agent integrated energy system considering integrated demand response based on game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    10. Meng, Yuan & Qiu, Jing & Zhang, Cuo & Lei, Gang & Zhu, Jianguo, 2024. "A Holistic P2P market for active and reactive energy trading in VPPs considering both financial benefits and network constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    2. Lyu, Cheng & Jia, Youwei & Xu, Zhao, 2021. "Fully decentralized peer-to-peer energy sharing framework for smart buildings with local battery system and aggregated electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    3. João Mello & Cristina de Lorenzo & Fco. Alberto Campos & José Villar, 2023. "Pricing and Simulating Energy Transactions in Energy Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Wang, Zibo & Yu, Xiaodan & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie, 2020. "A distributed Peer-to-Peer energy transaction method for diversified prosumers in Urban Community Microgrid System," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Davarzani, Sima & Pisica, Ioana & Taylor, Gareth A. & Munisami, Kevin J., 2021. "Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    7. Sun, Lingling & Qiu, Jing & Han, Xiao & Yin, Xia & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2020. "Capacity and energy sharing platform with hybrid energy storage system: An example of hospitality industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    8. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Ge, Shaoyun & Li, Jifeng & He, Xingtang & Liu, Hong, 2021. "Joint energy market design for local integrated energy system service procurement considering demand flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    10. Siripha Junlakarn & Phimsupha Kokchang & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Drivers and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Rodrigues, Daniel L. & Ye, Xianming & Xia, Xiaohua & Zhu, Bing, 2020. "Battery energy storage sizing optimisation for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Filipe Bandeiras & Álvaro Gomes & Mário Gomes & Paulo Coelho, 2023. "Exploring Energy Trading Markets in Smart Grid and Microgrid Systems and Their Implications for Sustainability in Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.
    13. El-Baz, Wessam & Tzscheutschler, Peter & Wagner, Ulrich, 2019. "Integration of energy markets in microgrids: A double-sided auction with device-oriented bidding strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 625-639.
    14. Zhang, Bidan & Du, Yang & Chen, Xiaoyang & Lim, Eng Gee & Jiang, Lin & Yan, Ke, 2022. "A novel adaptive penalty mechanism for Peer-to-Peer energy trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    15. Zhou, Yue & Wu, Jianzhong & Song, Guanyu & Long, Chao, 2020. "Framework design and optimal bidding strategy for ancillary service provision from a peer-to-peer energy trading community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    16. Lüth, Alexandra & Zepter, Jan Martin & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging, Ruud, 2018. "Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1233-1243.
    17. Liao, Wei & Xiao, Fu & Li, Yanxue & Zhang, Hanbei & Peng, Jinqing, 2024. "A comparative study of demand-side energy management strategies for building integrated photovoltaics-battery and electric vehicles (EVs) in diversified building communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    18. Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Zacharis, Evan, 2019. "Optimisation framework for the design and operation of open-market urban and remote community microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Schwidtal, J.M. & Piccini, P. & Troncia, M. & Chitchyan, R. & Montakhabi, M. & Francis, C. & Gorbatcheva, A. & Capper, T. & Mustafa, M.A. & Andoni, M. & Robu, V. & Bahloul, M. & Scott, I.J. & Mbavarir, 2023. "Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:326:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922012375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.