IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v324y2022ics0306261922009266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmented model-based framework for battery remaining useful life prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Thelen, Adam
  • Li, Meng
  • Hu, Chao
  • Bekyarova, Elena
  • Kalinin, Sergey
  • Sanghadasa, Mohan

Abstract

Traditional, model-based approaches for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of a rechargeable battery cell simply update and extrapolate a mathematical model which describes the evolution of the cell’s capacity fade trend. These approaches are straightforward but tend to break down when the capacity fade trend changes over the cell’s lifetime. To retain the desirable properties of model-based prediction approaches (uncertainty quantification, long-term accuracy, limited physical meaning) and improve their overall accuracy in RUL prediction, we augment empirical model-based prediction with data-driven error correction. Our approach decomposes the task of RUL prediction into two steps: 1) Offline training of data-driven models for RUL error correction and 2) Online data-driven correction of model-based RUL prediction. The approach is evaluated on five datasets consisting of 237 cells: 1) three open-source datasets, 2) one proprietary dataset, and 3) a simulated out-of-distribution dataset. Results show that data-driven error correction effectively reduces root-mean-square-error by 40% and mean uncertainty calibration error by 34% compared to a model-based approach alone. The proposed approach is also shown to be more conservative in its uncertainty estimates than a purely data-driven RUL prediction approach. Special attention is given to ensure the initial model-based uncertainty estimates are propagated through the data-driven error correction model and considered in the final RUL prediction. The enhanced uncertainty quantification of our approach makes it suitable for deployment in an online predictive maintenance scheduling framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Thelen, Adam & Li, Meng & Hu, Chao & Bekyarova, Elena & Kalinin, Sergey & Sanghadasa, Mohan, 2022. "Augmented model-based framework for battery remaining useful life prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:324:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922009266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922009266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Xiujuan & Fang, Huajing, 2015. "An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 74-82.
    2. Yan, Lisen & Peng, Jun & Gao, Dianzhu & Wu, Yue & Liu, Yongjie & Li, Heng & Liu, Weirong & Huang, Zhiwu, 2022. "A hybrid method with cascaded structure for early-stage remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Hu, Chao & Jain, Gaurav & Tamirisa, Prabhakar & Gorka, Tom, 2014. "Method for estimating capacity and predicting remaining useful life of lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 182-189.
    4. Shengjin Tang & Chuanqiang Yu & Xue Wang & Xiaosong Guo & Xiaosheng Si, 2014. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Wiener Process with Measurement Error," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Li, Shuangqi & He, Hongwen & Su, Chang & Zhao, Pengfei, 2020. "Data driven battery modeling and management method with aging phenomenon considered," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Xu, Xiaodong & Tang, Shengjin & Yu, Chuanqiang & Xie, Jian & Han, Xuebing & Ouyang, Minggao, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-ion Batteries Based on Wiener Process Under Time-Varying Temperature Condition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Kristen A. Severson & Peter M. Attia & Norman Jin & Nicholas Perkins & Benben Jiang & Zi Yang & Michael H. Chen & Muratahan Aykol & Patrick K. Herring & Dimitrios Fraggedakis & Martin Z. Bazant & Step, 2019. "Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 383-391, May.
    8. Chen, Zewang & Shi, Na & Ji, Yufan & Niu, Mu & Wang, Youren, 2021. "Lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction based on BLS-RVM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Peter M. Attia & Aditya Grover & Norman Jin & Kristen A. Severson & Todor M. Markov & Yang-Hung Liao & Michael H. Chen & Bryan Cheong & Nicholas Perkins & Zi Yang & Patrick K. Herring & Muratahan Ayko, 2020. "Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 578(7795), pages 397-402, February.
    10. Chang, Yang & Fang, Huajing & Zhang, Yong, 2017. "A new hybrid method for the prediction of the remaining useful life of a lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1564-1578.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Dengwei & Cheng, Yujie & Zhou, An & Lu, Chen & Chong, Jin & Ma, Jian, 2024. "Remaining useful life prediction and cycle life test optimization for multiple-formula battery: A method based on multi-source transfer learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. J. N. Chandra Sekhar & Bullarao Domathoti & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, 2023. "Prediction of Battery Remaining Useful Life Using Machine Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Zhang, Xiaoxi & Pan, Yongjun & Xiong, Yue & Zhang, Yongzhi & Tang, Mao & Dai, Wei & Liu, Binghe & Hou, Liang, 2024. "Deep learning-based vibration stress and fatigue-life prediction of a battery-pack system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    4. Chunxiang Zhu & Zhiwei He & Zhengyi Bao & Changcheng Sun & Mingyu Gao, 2023. "Prognosis of Lithium-Ion Batteries’ Remaining Useful Life Based on a Sequence-to-Sequence Model with Variational Mode Decomposition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Zhang, Jiarui & Wang, Chao & Li, Jinzhong & Xie, Yuguang & Mao, Lei & Hu, Zhiyong, 2023. "A Bayesian method for capacity degradation prediction of lithium-ion battery considering both within and cross group heterogeneity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rauf, Huzaifa & Khalid, Muhammad & Arshad, Naveed, 2022. "Machine learning in state of health and remaining useful life estimation: Theoretical and technological development in battery degradation modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Ma, Guijun & Zhang, Yong & Cheng, Cheng & Zhou, Beitong & Hu, Pengchao & Yuan, Ye, 2019. "Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on false nearest neighbors and a hybrid neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Xiaodong Xu & Chuanqiang Yu & Shengjin Tang & Xiaoyan Sun & Xiaosheng Si & Lifeng Wu, 2019. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Wiener Processes with Considering the Relaxation Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. He, Ning & Wang, Qiqi & Lu, Zhenfeng & Chai, Yike & Yang, Fangfang, 2024. "Early prediction of battery lifetime based on graphical features and convolutional neural networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    6. Lyu, Guangzheng & Zhang, Heng & Miao, Qiang, 2023. "Parallel State Fusion LSTM-based Early-cycle Stage Lithium-ion Battery RUL Prediction Under Lebesgue Sampling Framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan & Lee, Hyunjun & Jung, DaWoon & Brigljevic, Boris & Choi, Yunseok & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Fujin Wang & Zhi Zhai & Zhibin Zhao & Yi Di & Xuefeng Chen, 2024. "Physics-informed neural network for lithium-ion battery degradation stable modeling and prognosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Liyuan Shao & Yong Zhang & Xiujuan Zheng & Xin He & Yufeng Zheng & Zhiwei Liu, 2023. "A Review of Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Energy Storage Components Based on Stochastic Filtering Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Zhang, Qisong & Yang, Lin & Guo, Wenchao & Qiang, Jiaxi & Peng, Cheng & Li, Qinyi & Deng, Zhongwei, 2022. "A deep learning method for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction based on sparse segment data via cloud computing system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Mingsan Ouyang & Peicheng Shen, 2022. "Prediction of Remaining Useful Life of Lithium Batteries Based on WOA-VMD and LSTM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Chen, Dan & Meng, Jinhao & Huang, Huanyang & Wu, Ji & Liu, Ping & Lu, Jiwu & Liu, Tianqi, 2022. "An Empirical-Data Hybrid Driven Approach for Remaining Useful Life prediction of lithium-ion batteries considering capacity diving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Che, Yunhong & Zheng, Yusheng & Wu, Yue & Sui, Xin & Bharadwaj, Pallavi & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan & Yang, Yalian & Hu, Xiaosong & Teodorescu, Remus, 2022. "Data efficient health prognostic for batteries based on sequential information-driven probabilistic neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    14. Zhang, Chen & Wang, Hongmin & Wu, Lifeng, 2023. "Life prediction model for lithium-ion battery considering fast-charging protocol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    15. Gu, Xubo & Bai, Hanyu & Cui, Xiaofan & Zhu, Juner & Zhuang, Weichao & Li, Zhaojian & Hu, Xiaosong & Song, Ziyou, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities for second-life batteries: Key technologies and economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Li, Xiang & Huo, Mingyi & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "An adaptive remaining useful life prediction approach for single battery with unlabeled small sample data and parameter uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Hsu, Chia-Wei & Xiong, Rui & Chen, Nan-Yow & Li, Ju & Tsou, Nien-Ti, 2022. "Deep neural network battery life and voltage prediction by using data of one cycle only," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    18. Liu, Yunpeng & Hou, Bo & Ahmed, Moin & Mao, Zhiyu & Feng, Jiangtao & Chen, Zhongwei, 2024. "A hybrid deep learning approach for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on discharging fragments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    19. Penelope K. Jones & Ulrich Stimming & Alpha A. Lee, 2022. "Impedance-based forecasting of lithium-ion battery performance amid uneven usage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Zhao, Bo & Zhang, Weige & Zhang, Yanru & Zhang, Caiping & Zhang, Chi & Zhang, Junwei, 2024. "Research on the remaining useful life prediction method for lithium-ion batteries by fusion of feature engineering and deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:324:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922009266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.