IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v251y2019ic97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COSMO-based solvent selection and Aspen Plus process simulation for tar absorptive removal

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xiaosong
  • Pan, Jiawei
  • Wang, Liang
  • Qian, Tianle
  • Zhu, Yuezhao
  • Sun, Hongqi
  • Gao, Jian
  • Chen, Haijun
  • Gao, Ying
  • Liu, Chang

Abstract

Tar accumulation is a major problem that has critically hindered further development of biomass gasification. Current studies on oil washing technologies have made progress, but experimental screening of core absorbents and process performance lack theoretical insight. Therefore, based on the design of Quench Coupled with ABsorption Technology (QCABT), the benzene, toluene, phenol, and naphthalene mixture representing real tar components was used as a tar simulant. The method of screening absorbents by Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS) combined with thermodynamic relationships was established, and the tar removal process was investigated by Aspen Plus simulation. The results revealed that the developed semi-quantitative absorbent screening method is more efficient than that using only infinite dilution activity coefficients. A mixture of screened soybean oil, and N-formylmorpholine (NFM) is the optimal tar absorbent. The maximum relative error between Aspen Plus simulation and the experiment is 9.5‰ indicating good reliability. The addition of 30 v/v% of NFM could effectively promote the absorption of benzene and toluene. Higher liquid–gas ratio of absorption, lower absorption temperature, and better regeneration could ensure the satisfactory gas purification degree. The loss tendency and rate of oleic and linoleic acids (soybean oil simulant) are basically the same, but the loss rate of NFM is 4–6 orders of magnitude higher—this has the biggest contribution to solvent loss. The 90 °C condenser at the outlet of the desorber can control the solvent loss rate effectively. Under optimal conditions, the content of tar, energy loss, as well as loss ratio can be reduced to below 30 mg/Nm3, 1600 kJ/kg, and 0.5‰, respectively. As a result, this fascinating method provides quantitative guidance for tar absorption and removal.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xiaosong & Pan, Jiawei & Wang, Liang & Qian, Tianle & Zhu, Yuezhao & Sun, Hongqi & Gao, Jian & Chen, Haijun & Gao, Ying & Liu, Chang, 2019. "COSMO-based solvent selection and Aspen Plus process simulation for tar absorptive removal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:251:y:2019:i:c:97
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919309882
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervy, Maxime & Weiss-Hortala, Elsa & Pham Minh, Doan & Dib, Hadi & Villot, Audrey & Gérente, Claire & Berhanu, Sarah & Chesnaud, Anthony & Thorel, Alain & Le Coq, Laurence & Nzihou, Ange, 2019. "Reactivity and deactivation mechanisms of pyrolysis chars from bio-waste during catalytic cracking of tar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 487-499.
    2. Salman, Chaudhary Awais & Naqvi, Muhammad & Thorin, Eva & Yan, Jinyue, 2018. "Gasification process integration with existing combined heat and power plants for polygeneration of dimethyl ether or methanol: A detailed profitability analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 116-128.
    3. Chen, Guanyi & Li, Jian & Cheng, Zhanjun & Yan, Beibei & Ma, Wenchao & Yao, Jingang, 2018. "Investigation on model compound of biomass gasification tar cracking in microwave furnace: Comparative research," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 249-257.
    4. Bhave, A.G. & Vyas, D.K. & Patel, J.B., 2008. "A wet packed bed scrubber-based producer gas cooling–cleaning system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1716-1720.
    5. Widjaya, Elita R. & Chen, Guangnan & Bowtell, Les & Hills, Catherine, 2018. "Gasification of non-woody biomass: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 184-193.
    6. Thapa, Sunil & Indrawan, Natarianto & Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Kumar, Ajay & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2019. "Tar reduction in biomass syngas using heat exchanger and vegetable oil bubbler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 402-409.
    7. Sunil Thapa & Prakashbhai R. Bhoi & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2017. "Effects of Syngas Cooling and Biomass Filter Medium on Tar Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Han, Jun & Kim, Heejoon, 2008. "The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 397-416, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minda Loweski Feliz & Lokmane Abdelouahed & Bechara Taouk, 2024. "Comparative and Descriptive Study of Biomass Gasification Simulations Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Aldi & Nicola Casari & Michele Pinelli & Alessio Suman & Alessandro Vulpio, 2022. "Performance Degradation of a Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Due to Tar Deposition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Thapa, Sunil & Indrawan, Natarianto & Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Kumar, Ajay & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2019. "Tar reduction in biomass syngas using heat exchanger and vegetable oil bubbler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 402-409.
    3. Cheng Yang & Kanfeng Ying & Fan Yang & Huanghu Peng & Zezhou Chen, 2022. "Simulation on the Electric and Thermal Fields of a Microwave Reactor for Ex Situ Biomass Tar Elimination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    5. Singh, Renu & Shukla, Ashish, 2014. "A review on methods of flue gas cleaning from combustion of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 854-864.
    6. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Chiang, Kung-Yuh & Lu, Cheng-Han & Lin, Ming-Hui & Chien, Kuang-Li, 2013. "Reducing tar yield in gasification of paper-reject sludge by using a hot-gas cleaning system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-53.
    8. Li, Jian & Tao, Junyu & Yan, Beibei & Jiao, Liguo & Chen, Guanyi & Hu, Jianli, 2021. "Review of microwave-based treatments of biomass gasification tar," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    10. Huang, Zhen & Zheng, Anqing & Deng, Zhengbing & Wei, Guoqiang & Zhao, Kun & Chen, Dezhen & He, Fang & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin & Li, Fanxing, 2020. "In-situ removal of toluene as a biomass tar model compound using NiFe2O4 for application in chemical looping gasification oxygen carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Wang, Shuxiao & Zhang, Yuyuan & Shan, Rui & Gu, Jing & Yuan, Haoran & Chen, Yong, 2022. "Steam reforming of biomass tar model compound over two waste char-based Ni catalysts for syngas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    12. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2017. "The fate of SOFC anodes under biomass producer gas contaminants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1050-1066.
    13. Li, Jian & Jiao, Liguo & Tao, Junyu & Chen, Guanyi & Hu, Jianli & Yan, Beibei & Mansour, Mohy & Guo, Yaoyu & Ye, Peiwen & Ding, Zheng & Yu, Tianxiao, 2020. "Can microwave treat biomass tar? A comprehensive study based on experimental and net energy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    14. Anis, Samsudin & Zainal, Z.A., 2011. "Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2355-2377, June.
    15. Shen, Yafei & Wang, Junfeng & Ge, Xinlei & Chen, Mindong, 2016. "By-products recycling for syngas cleanup in biomass pyrolysis – An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1246-1268.
    16. de Oliveira, Diego C. & Lora, Electo E.S. & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Maya, Diego M.Y. & Garcia-Pérez, Manuel, 2023. "Gas cleaning systems for integrating biomass gasification with Fischer-Tropsch synthesis - A review of impurity removal processes and their sequences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Unyaphan, Siriwat & Tarnpradab, Thanyawan & Takahashi, Fumitake & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2017. "Improvement of tar removal performance of oil scrubber by producing syngas microbubbles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 802-812.
    18. Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz, 2013. "Energetic analysis of a system integrated with biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-278.
    19. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Chen, Cheng & Volpe, Roberto & Jiang, Xi, 2021. "A molecular investigation on lignin thermochemical conversion and carbonaceous organics deposition induced catalyst deactivation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:251:y:2019:i:c:97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.