IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v250y2019icp855-863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of rectifiers on the energy demand and gas quality of alkaline electrolysis systems in dynamic operation

Author

Listed:
  • Speckmann, Friedrich-W.
  • Bintz, Steffen
  • Birke, Kai Peter

Abstract

This paper investigates the correlation between different rectifier topologies and the energy demand as well as the gas quality of an alkaline electrolysis. The focus lies on recent scenarios which require partial load operation of electrolyzers. The layout-dependent current outputs of three conventional and a self-developed rectifier were simulated based on actual measurement data. After the down-scaling of the acquired current profiles, these were applied to a lab-scale alkaline electrolyzer. The rectifier structures are assessed for dynamic operation between 25% and 100% of their nominal load. Experimental results show a strong influence of the rectified current quality on the required electrical energy of the electrolysis process. Conventional thyristor structures with a high current ripple consume up to 13% more energy compared to the newly designed process current source, which provides an almost perfectly smoothed direct current. Additionally, high current ripples, which occur especially in low load scenarios, cause oxygen to diffuse to the hydrogen half cell and reduce the product gas purity. Therefore, not every rectifier is suited for dynamic operation of electrolysis systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Speckmann, Friedrich-W. & Bintz, Steffen & Birke, Kai Peter, 2019. "Influence of rectifiers on the energy demand and gas quality of alkaline electrolysis systems in dynamic operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 855-863.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:250:y:2019:i:c:p:855-863
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919308694
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seiler, Jean-Marie & Hohwiller, Carole & Imbach, Juliette & Luciani, Jean-François, 2010. "Technical and economical evaluation of enhanced biomass to liquid fuel processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3587-3592.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jang, Dohyung & Cho, Hyun-Seok & Kang, Sanggyu, 2021. "Numerical modeling and analysis of the effect of pressure on the performance of an alkaline water electrolysis system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Luis Camargo & Daniel Comas & Yulineth Cardenas Escorcia & Anibal Alviz-Meza & Gaylord Carrillo Caballero & Ivan Portnoy, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends around Hydrogen Production Based on the Scopus Database in the Period 2011–2021," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Koponen, Joonas & Ruuskanen, Vesa & Hehemann, Michael & Rauls, Edward & Kosonen, Antti & Ahola, Jero & Stolten, Detlef, 2020. "Effect of power quality on the design of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Quentin Combe & Alireza Abasian & Serge Pierfederici & Mathieu Weber & Stéphane Dufour, 2022. "Control of a Three-Phase Current Source Rectifier for H 2 Storage Applications in AC Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Gianluigi Migliavacca & Claudio Carlini & Piergiovanni Domenighini & Claudio Zagano, 2024. "Hydrogen: Prospects and Criticalities for Future Development and Analysis of Present EU and National Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-42, September.
    6. Frank Gambou & Damien Guilbert & Michel Zasadzinski & Hugues Rafaralahy, 2022. "A Comprehensive Survey of Alkaline Electrolyzer Modeling: Electrical Domain and Specific Electrolyte Conductivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Yu Deng & Jingang Han, 2024. "Energy Management of Green Port Multi-Energy Microgrid Based on Fuzzy Logic Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Speckmann, Friedrich-W. & Keiner, Dominik & Birke, Kai Peter, 2020. "Influence of rectifiers on the techno-economic performance of alkaline electrolysis in a smart grid environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 107-116.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cremonez, Paulo André & Feroldi, Michael & de Araújo, Amanda Viana & Negreiros Borges, Maykon & Weiser Meier, Thompson & Feiden, Armin & Gustavo Teleken, Joel, 2015. "Biofuels in Brazilian aviation: Current scenario and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1063-1072.
    2. Sun, Shaohui & Yan, Wei & Sun, Peiqin & Chen, Junwu, 2012. "Thermodynamic analysis of ethanol reforming for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 911-924.
    3. Zhou, Wenji & Zhu, Bing & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhao, Fangxian & Fei, Weiyang, 2011. "Technoeconomic assessment of China’s indirect coal liquefaction projects with different CO2 capture alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6559-6566.
    4. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2012. "Value-added carbon management technologies for low CO2 intensive carbon-based energy vectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 280-297.
    5. Sheng, Haoqiang & Huang, Xiaobin & Hu, Wenbin & Ji, Yuan & Chen, Junming & Xie, Mingyun & He, Miaoshen & Zhang, Bo & Liu, Hong, 2023. "Stability and combustion performance enhancement of ethanol/kerosene fuel by carbonized poly[cyclotriphosphazene-co-(4,4′-sulfonyldiphenol)] nanotubes via biomimetic hydrogen bonding strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    6. Liu, Guangrui & Yan, Beibei & Chen, Guanyi, 2013. "Technical review on jet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 59-70.
    7. Menten, Fabio & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Lorne, Daphné & Bouvart, Frédérique, 2015. "Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 942-960.
    8. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2012. "Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6507-6521.
    9. Haarlemmer, Geert & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Setier, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels – A literature survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 667-676.
    10. Sunde, K. & Brekke, A. & Solberg, B., 2011. "Environmental impacts and costs of woody Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL) production and use -- A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 591-602, October.
    11. Qin, Shiyue & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2022. "Opportunities for renewable electricity utilization in coal to liquid fuels process: Thermodynamic and techo-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    12. Shen, Yafei, 2015. "Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents/catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 281-295.
    13. Wafiq, A. & Hanafy, M., 2015. "Feasibility assessment of diesel fuel production in Egypt using coal and biomass: Integrated novel methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 522-533.
    14. Wang, Sicong & Wang, Shifeng, 2011. "Spatial interaction models for biomass consumption in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6555-6558.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:250:y:2019:i:c:p:855-863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.