IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v229y2018icp128-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Xinli
  • Zhao, Yangyang
  • Zhu, Jialing
  • Zhang, Wei

Abstract

Both thermodynamic performance and techno-economic analysis of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems have been investigated in this study. Thermodynamic analysis were carried out for four power generation systems: single-flash (SF) system, double-flash (DF) system, flash-ORC (FORC) system; and double-flash-ORC (DFORC) system. By choosing the maximum net power output as an objective function, optimization is done based on comparisons among the four systems with a goal of increasing the net power output by 20% under the condition that the SF is replaced by one of the compound systems (DF, FORC, and DFORC). As an original contribution, five maps useful for real applications have been generated for selecting optimum geothermal power cycles under different geofluid’s conditions, with consideration of five ORC working fluids (R123, R152a, isobutane, n-pentane and R245fa). The boundaries that determine whether the compound systems have advantages over the SF system are functions of the geofluid temperature, geofluid dryness, and the type of the working fluid used by the ORC. In the techno-economic study, Levelized Electricity Cost (LEC) and Payback Period (PBP) analyses were carried out. The results from the LEC and PBP studies show good agreement. For the three scenarios analyzed, each of the compound power systems has a better engineering economic performance than the SF system. For the “common” heat source condition investigated, comparison among the three compound systems shows that the DF system has a lowest levelized electricity cost and the shortest payback period; the FORC and DFORC show similar techno-economic performance and have advantages over the SF system.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Xinli & Zhao, Yangyang & Zhu, Jialing & Zhang, Wei, 2018. "Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 128-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:128-141
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918310614
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walraven, Daniël & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2015. "Minimizing the levelized cost of electricity production from low-temperature geothermal heat sources with ORCs: Water or air cooled?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 144-153.
    2. Luo, Chao & Huang, Lichang & Gong, Yulie & Ma, Weibin, 2012. "Thermodynamic comparison of different types of geothermal power plant systems and case studies in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 155-160.
    3. Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Zhang, Wei & Lu, Xinli, 2017. "A study on generating a map for selection of optimum power generation cycles used for Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 502-512.
    4. Zeyghami, Mehdi, 2015. "Performance analysis and binary working fluid selection of combined flash-binary geothermal cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 765-774.
    5. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    6. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    7. Zhai, Huixing & Shi, Lin & An, Qingsong, 2014. "Influence of working fluid properties on system performance and screen evaluation indicators for geothermal ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 2-11.
    8. Roy, J.P. & Mishra, M.K. & Misra, Ashok, 2011. "Performance analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle with superheating under different heat source temperature conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 2995-3004.
    9. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    10. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    11. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & D´Amico, Sebastiano & Liarte, I.A., 2016. "Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 133-144.
    12. Hung, T.C. & Wang, S.K. & Kuo, C.H. & Pei, B.S. & Tsai, K.F., 2010. "A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1403-1411.
    13. Shaopeng Huang, 2012. "Geothermal energy in China," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 557-560, August.
    14. Wang, Xiao-Qiong & Li, Xiao-Ping & Li, You-Rong & Wu, Chun-Mei, 2015. "Payback period estimation and parameter optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 734-745.
    15. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    16. Mengying Li & Noam Lior, 2014. "Comparative Analysis of Power Plant Options for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng, Nan & Gao, Xiang & Wang, Zeyu & Li, Tailu, 2024. "Numerical investigation and optimization on dynamic power generation performance of enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Xie, Jingxuan & Wang, Jiansheng, 2022. "Compatibility investigation and techno-economic performance optimization of whole geothermal power generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Meng, Nan & Li, Tailu & Wang, Jianqiang & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua & Qin, Haosen, 2020. "Synergetic mechanism of fracture properties and system configuration on techno-economic performance of enhanced geothermal system for power generation during life cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 910-924.
    4. Vaccari, Marco & Pannocchia, Gabriele & Tognotti, Leonardo & Paci, Marco, 2023. "Rigorous simulation of geothermal power plants to evaluate environmental performance of alternative configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 471-483.
    5. Hao Yu & Xinli Lu & Wei Zhang & Jiali Liu, 2024. "A Theoretical Study on the Thermal Performance of an Increasing Pressure Endothermic Cycle for Geothermal Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Qiu, Lihua & He, Li & Kang, Yu & Liang, Dongzhe, 2022. "Assessment of the potential of enhanced geothermal systems in Asia under the impact of global warming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 636-646.
    7. Yapeng Ren & Xinli Lu & Wei Zhang & Jiaqi Zhang & Jiali Liu & Feng Ma & Zhiwei Cui & Hao Yu & Tianji Zhu & Yalin Zhang, 2022. "Preliminary Study on Optimization of a Geothermal Heating System Coupled with Energy Storage for Office Building Heating in North China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Li, Tailu & Qin, Haosen & Wang, Jianqiang & Gao, Xiang & Meng, Nan & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua, 2021. "Energetic and exergetic performance of a novel polygeneration energy system driven by geothermal energy and solar energy for power, hydrogen and domestic hot water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 318-336.
    9. Tian, Xueyu & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Carbon-neutral hybrid energy systems with deep water source cooling, biomass heating, and geothermal heat and power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 413-432.
    10. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Alsharif, Sameer & Sharma, Kamal & El.Shafy, Asem Saleh & Farhang, Babak & Mohammed, Adil Hussein, 2022. "Multi-objective optimizations and exergoeconomic analyses of a high-efficient bi-evaporator multigeneration system with freshwater unit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 699-714.
    11. Fan, Huifang & Zhang, Luyi & Wang, Ruifei & Song, Hongqing & Xie, Hui & Du, Li & Sun, Pengguang, 2020. "Investigation on geothermal water reservoir development and utilization with variable temperature regulation: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Jankowski, Marcin & Borsukiewicz, Aleksandra & Wiśniewski, Sławomir & Hooman, Kamel, 2020. "Multi-objective analysis of an influence of a geothermal water salinity on optimal operating parameters in low-temperature ORC power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Mardan Dezfouli, Amir Hossein & Niroozadeh, Narjes & Jahangiri, Ali, 2023. "Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel geothermal driven power generation system of combined transcritical CO2 and C5H12 ORCs coupled with LNG stream i," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    2. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    3. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    5. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    6. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    7. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    8. Chen, Tairu & Liu, Gang & Liao, Shengming, 2019. "Impacts of boundary conditions on reservoir numerical simulation and performance prediction of enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-213.
    9. Vaccari, Marco & Pannocchia, Gabriele & Tognotti, Leonardo & Paci, Marco & Bonciani, Roberto, 2020. "A rigorous simulation model of geothermal power plants for emission control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    10. Meng, Nan & Li, Tailu & Wang, Jianqiang & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua & Qin, Haosen, 2020. "Synergetic mechanism of fracture properties and system configuration on techno-economic performance of enhanced geothermal system for power generation during life cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 910-924.
    11. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    12. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    13. Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Long, R. & Bao, Y.J. & Huang, X.M. & Liu, W., 2014. "Exergy analysis and working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 475-483.
    15. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Lu, Xinli & Huang, Xiaoxue & Liu, Ketao & Wu, Xiujie, 2015. "A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: Current status and prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 466-483.
    17. Cakici, Duygu Melek & Erdogan, Anil & Colpan, Can Ozgur, 2017. "Thermodynamic performance assessment of an integrated geothermal powered supercritical regenerative organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 306-319.
    18. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.
    19. Meng, Nan & Gao, Xiang & Wang, Zeyu & Li, Tailu, 2024. "Numerical investigation and optimization on dynamic power generation performance of enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    20. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:128-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.