IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v7y2014i12p8427-8445d43669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Power Plant Options for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)

Author

Listed:
  • Mengying Li

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315, USA)

  • Noam Lior

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315, USA)

Abstract

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) extract heat from underground hot dry rock (HDR) by first fracturing the HDR and then circulating a geofluid (typically water) into it and bringing the heated geofluid to a power plant to generate electricity. This study focuses on analysis, examination, and comparison of leading geothermal power plant configurations with a geofluid temperature from 200 to 800 °C, and also analyzes the embodied energy of EGS surface power plants. The power generation analysis is focused on flash type cycles for using subcritical geofluid (<374 °C) and expansion type cycles for using supercritical geofluid (>374 °C). Key findings of this study include: (i) double-flash plants have 24.3%–29.0% higher geofluid effectiveness than single-flash ones, and 3%–10% lower specific embodied energy; (ii) the expansion type plants have geofluid effectiveness > 750 kJ/kg, significantly higher than flash type plants (geofluid effectiveness < 300 kJ/kg) and the specific embodied energy is lower; (iii) to increase the turbine outlet vapor fraction from 0.75 to 0.90, we include superheating by geofluid but that reduces the geofluid effectiveness by 28.3%; (iv) for geofluid temperatures above 650 °C, double-expansion plants have a 2% higher geofluid effectiveness and 5%–8% lower specific embodied energy than single-expansion ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengying Li & Noam Lior, 2014. "Comparative Analysis of Power Plant Options for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:12:p:8427-8445:d:43669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/12/8427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/12/8427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    2. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Bolatturk, Ali, 2008. "Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2366-2374.
    3. Yildirim, Deniz & Ozgener, Leyla, 2012. "Thermodynamics and exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6438-6454.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caulk, Robert A. & Tomac, Ingrid, 2017. "Reuse of abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 388-397.
    2. Yuchao Zeng & Liansheng Tang & Nengyou Wu & Jing Song & Yifei Cao, 2017. "Orthogonal Test Analysis on Conditions Affecting Electricity Generation Performance of an Enhanced Geothermal System at Yangbajing Geothermal Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & D´Amico, Sebastiano & Liarte, I.A., 2016. "Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 133-144.
    4. Jiang, Peixue & Li, Xiaolu & Xu, Ruina & Zhang, Fuzhen, 2016. "Heat extraction of novel underground well pattern systems for geothermal energy exploitation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-94.
    5. Paweł Gładysz & Anna Sowiżdżał & Maciej Miecznik & Maciej Hacaga & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of a Combined Heat and Power Plant Integrated with Carbon Dioxide Removal Technology: A Case Study for Central Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    6. Kaiyong Hu & Jialing Zhu & Wei Zhang & Xinli Lu, 2016. "A Selection Method for Power Generation Plants Used for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Moussa, Tamer & Dehghanpour, Hassan, 2022. "Evaluating geothermal energy production from suspended oil and gas wells by using data mining," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1294-1307.
    8. Li, Mengying & Lior, Noam, 2015. "Energy analysis for guiding the design of well systems of deep Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1173-1188.
    9. Lu, Xinli & Zhao, Yangyang & Zhu, Jialing & Zhang, Wei, 2018. "Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 128-141.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altun, A.F. & Kilic, M., 2020. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 261-274.
    2. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    3. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Kharseh, Mohamad & Al-Khawaja, Mohammed & Hassani, Ferri, 2015. "Utilization of oil wells for electricity generation: Performance and economics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 910-916.
    5. Gholizadeh, Towhid & Vajdi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "A new trigeneration system for power, cooling, and freshwater production driven by a flash-binary geothermal heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-43.
    6. Hai, Tao & Asadollahzadeh, Muhammad & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & AlQemlas, Turki & Elbadawy, Ibrahim & Salah, Bashir & Feyzbaxsh, Mahrad, 2023. "3E investigation and artificial neural network optimization of a new triple-flash geothermally-powered configuration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Guo, T. & Wang, H.X. & Zhang, S.J., 2011. "Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2639-2649.
    8. Cao, Yan & Mihardjo, Leonardus WW. & Dahari, Mahidzal & Ghaebi, Hadi & Parikhani, Towhid & Mohamed, Abdeliazim Mustafa, 2021. "An innovative double-flash binary cogeneration cooling and power (CCP) system: Thermodynamic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    9. Unverdi, Murat & Cerci, Yunus, 2013. "Performance analysis of Germencik Geothermal Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 192-200.
    10. Yekoladio, P.J. & Bello-Ochende, T. & Meyer, J.P., 2013. "Design and optimization of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger for an enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 128-137.
    11. Gökgedik, Harun & Yürüsoy, Muhammet & Keçebaş, Ali, 2016. "Improvement potential of a real geothermal power plant using advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 254-263.
    12. Olusola Bamisile & Qi Huang & Paul O. K. Anane & Mustafa Dagbasi, 2019. "Performance Analyses of a Renewable Energy Powered System for Trigeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Keçebaş, Ali & Gökgedik, Harun, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of a geothermal power plant for advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 746-755.
    14. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    15. Moya, Diego & Aldás, Clay & Kaparaju, Prasad, 2018. "Geothermal energy: Power plant technology and direct heat applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 889-901.
    16. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Koyuncu, Ismail, 2021. "Thermoeconomic modeling and artificial neural network optimization of Afyon geothermal power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1166-1181.
    17. Tarun Kumar Aseri & Chandan Sharma & Tara C. Kandpal, 2022. "Condenser cooling technologies for concentrating solar power plants: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4511-4565, April.
    18. Abdolalipouradl, Mehran & Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2020. "A comparative analysis of novel combined flash-binary cycles for Sabalan geothermal wells: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    19. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    20. Samadi, Fereshteh & Kazemi, Neda, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis of zeotropic mixture on the new proposed organic Rankine cycle for energy production from geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1250-1265.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:12:p:8427-8445:d:43669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.